Can Brands Circumvent Marketing Regulations? Exploiting Umbrella Branding in Financial Markets

References

• Aaker DA (1990) Brand extensions: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Sloan Management Rev. 31(Summer):47–56.Google Scholar
• Aaker DA, Carman JM (1982) Are you overadvertising? J. Advertising Res. 22(August):57–70.Google Scholar
• Aaker DA, Keller KL (1990) Consumer response to brand extensions. J. Marketing 54(1):27–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aaker DA, Carman JM, Jacobson R (1982) Modeling advertising-sales relationships involving feedback: A time series analysis of six cereal brands. J. Marketing Res. 19(1):116–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ackerman A (2014) CFTC eases hedge-fund advertising ban. Wall Street Journal (September 9), https://www.wsj.com/articles/regulator-eases-longstanding-restrictions-on-private-fund-offerings-1410311414.Google Scholar
• Ackermann C, McEnally R, Ravenscraft D (1999) The performance of hedge funds: Risk, return, and incentives. J. Finance 54(3):833–874.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal V, Daniel N, Naik NY (2009) Role of managerial incentives and discretion in hedge fund performance. J. Finance 64(5):2221–2256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal V, Lu Y, Ray S (2016) Under one roof: A study of simultaneously managed hedge funds and funds of hedge funds. Management Sci. 62(3):722–740.Link, Google Scholar
• Amaldoss W, He C (2010) Product variety, informative advertising, and price competition. J. Marketing Res. 47(1):146–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• American Bar Association (1969) Commission to Study the FTC, Report 41.Google Scholar
• Anand BN, Shachar R (2004) Brands as beacons: A new source of loyalty to multiproduct firms. J. Marketing Res. 41(2):135–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aragon G (2007) Share restrictions and asset pricing: Evidence from the hedge fund industry. J. Financial Econom. 83(1):33–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econom. Stud. 58(2):277–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashley R, Granger CWJ, Schmalensee R (1980) Advertising and aggregate consumption: An analysis of causality. Econometrica 48(5):1149–1167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Babbit CE, Chambers MA, Browder JL (2012) SEC proposes rules to eliminate the prohibition against general solicitation and advertising for hedge funds and other private funds. Mondaq (September 7), http://mondaq.com/unitedstates/x/195490/Securities/SEC+Proposes+Rules+To+Eliminate+The+Prohibition+Against+General+Solicitation+And+Advertising+For+Hedge+Funds+And+Other+Private+Funds.Google Scholar
• Bakos Y, Brynjolfsson E (2000) Bundling and competition on the internet. Marketing Sci. 19(1):63–82.Link, Google Scholar
• Balachander S, Ghose S (2003) Reciprocal spillover effects: A strategic benefit of brand extensions. J. Marketing 67(1):4–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baltagi B, Levin D (1986) Estimating dynamic demand for cigarettes using panel data: The effects of bootlegging, taxation and advertising reconsidered. Rev. Econom. Statist. 68(1):148–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baquero G, Verbeek M (2009) A portrait of hedge fund investors: Flows, performance and smart money. EFA 2006 Zurich Meeting Working Paper, University of Zurich–Swiss Banking Institute, Zurich, Switzerland.Google Scholar
• Bass FM, Leone RP (1986) Estimating micro relationships from macro data: A comparative study of two approximations of the brand loyal model under temporal aggregation. J. Marketing Res. 23(3):291–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benegal V (2005) India: Alcohol and public health. Addiction 100(8):1051–1056.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berk J, Green R (2004) Mutual fund flows and performance in rational markets. J. Political Econom. 112(6):1269–1295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boush DM, Loken B (1991) A process-tracing study of brand extension evaluation. J. Marketing Res. 28(1):16–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bronnenberg JB, Dube J-P, Mela CF (2010) Do digital video recorders influence sales? J. Marketing Res. 67:998–1010.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Broniarczyk SM, Alba JW (1994) The importance of the brand in brand extension. J. Marketing Res. 31(2):214–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burns MR (1977) The competitive effects of trust-busting: Portfolio analysis. J. Political Econom. 85(4):717–739.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Capella ML, Taylor CR, Webster C (2008) The effect of cigarette advertising bans on consumption: A meta-analysis. J. Advertising 37(2):7–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chaplinsky S, Hanley KW, Katie Moon SK (2017) The JOBS Act and the costs of going public. J. Accounting Res. 55(4):795–836.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cici G, Gibson S, Moussawi R (2010) Mutual fund performance when parent firms simultaneously manage hedge funds. J. Financial Intermediation 19(2):169–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clarke DG (1976) Econometric measurement of the duration of advertising effect on sales. J. Marketing Res. 13(4):345–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper M, Gulen H, Raghavendra Rao P (2005) Changing names with style: Mutual fund name changes and their effects on fund flows. J. Finance 60(6):2825–2858.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Copeland R, Zuckerman G (2014) How individual investors can invest like a hedge fund. Wall Street Journal (August 14), https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-individual-investors-can-invest-like-a-hedge-fund-1407106285.Google Scholar
• Dacin PA, Smith DC (1994) The effect of brand portfolio characteristics on consumer evaluations of brand extensions. J. Marketing Res. 31(2):229–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dranove D, Jin GZ (2010) Quality disclosure and certification: Theory and practice. J. Econom. Lit. 48(4):935–963.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edelman B, Lai Z (2016) Design of search engine services: Channel interdependence in search engine results. J. Marketing Res. 53(6):881–900.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellert JC (1976) Mergers, antitrust law enforcement and shareholder returns. J. Finance 31(2):715–732.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdem T (1998) An empirical analysis of umbrella branding. J. Marketing Res. 35(3):339–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdem T, Sun B (2002) An empirical investigation of the spillover effects of advertising and sales promotions in umbrella branding. J. Marketing Res. 39(4):408–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama EF, French KR (1993) Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. J. Financial Econom. 33(1):3–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fung W, Hsieh DA (1997) Empirical characteristics of dynamic trading strategies: The case of hedge funds. Rev. Financial Stud. 10(2):275–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallaher S, Kaniel R, Starks L (2015) Advertising and mutual funds: From families to individual funds. CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP10329, Southern New Hampshire University, Manchester.Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A, Tucker C (2011a) Advertising bans and the substitutability of online and offline advertising. J. Marketing Res. 48(2):207–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A, Tucker C (2011b) Search engine advertising: Channel substitution when pricing ads to context. Management Sci. 57(3):458–470.Link, Google Scholar
• Granger CWJ (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37(3):424–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Israelsen RD (2016) Hard and soft information: Firm disclosure, SEC letters, and the JOBS Act. Working paper, Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
• Hamilton JL (1972) The demand for cigarettes: Advertising, the health scare and the cigarette advertising ban. Rev. Econom. Statist. 54(4):401–411.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauser JR, Shugan SM (2008) Defensive marketing strategies. Marketing Sci. 27(1):88–110.Link, Google Scholar
• Henriques DB (2004) Basic training doesn't guard against insurance pitch to G.I.'s. New York Times (July 20), https://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/20/business/basic-training-doesn-t-guard-against-insurance-pitch-to-gi-s.html.Google Scholar
• Herr PM, Farquhar PH, Fazio RH (1996) Impact of dominance and relatedness on brand extensions. J. Consumer Psychol. 5(2):135–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffman DL, Kopalle PK, Novak TP (2010) The “right” consumers for better concepts: Identifying consumers high in emergent nature to develop new product concepts. J. Marketing Res. 47(5):854–865.Crossref, Google Scholar
• House Committee on Government Operations (1958) Hearings on False and Misleading Advertising, 85th Congress, 2nd Session.Google Scholar
• Iizuka T, Jin GZ (2005) The effect of prescription drug advertising on doctor visits. J. Econom. Management Strategy 14(3):701–727.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ippolito RA (1992) Consumer reaction to measures of poor quality: Evidence from the mutual fund industry. J. Law Econom. 35(1):45–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jain CP, Wu JS (2000) Truth in mutual funds advertising: Evidence on future performance and fund flows. J. Finance 55(2):937–958.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janssen MCW, Non MC (2009) Going where the ad leads you: On high advertised prices and searching where to buy. Marketing Sci. 28(1):87–98.Link, Google Scholar
• Jin GZ, Sorensen AT (2006) Information and consumer choice: The value of publicized health plan ratings. J. Health Econom. 25(2):248–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson J, Tellis GJ (2008) Drivers of success for market entry into India and China. J. Marketing 72(2):1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson T (2018) AT&T–Time Warner trial: Judge queries DOJ expert witness on prediction of merger behavior. Variety (April 11), https://variety.com/2018/politics/news/att-time-warner-carl-shapiro-merger-predictions-1202750523/.Google Scholar
• Jones AM, Smythe T (2003) The information content of mutual fund print advertising. J. Consumer Affairs 37(1):22–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones A, Lesseig VP, Smythe TI (2007) Mutual fund advertising: Should investors take notice? J. Financial Services Marketing 12(3):242–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Korn M, Rexrode C (2018) Banks pay big bucks for top billing on college campuses. Wall Street Journal (January 28), https://www.wsj.com/articles/banks-pay-big-bucks-for-top-billing-on-college-campuses-1517148001.Google Scholar
• Lee J, Shin BS, Chung I (1996) Causality between advertising and sales: new evidence from cointegration. Appl. Econom. Lett. 3(5):299–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lei J, Dawar N, Lemmink J (2008) Negative spillover in brand portfolios: Exploring the antecedents of asymmetric effects. J. Marketing 72(3):111–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayzlin D, Shin J (2011) Uninformative advertising as an invitation to search. Marketing Sci. 30(4):666–685.Link, Google Scholar
• Meyvis T, Janiszewski C (2004) When are broad brands stronger brands? An accessibility perspective on the formation of brand equity. J. Consumer Res. 31(5):346–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monga AB, John DR (2010) What makes brands elastic? The influence of brand concept and styles of thinking on brand extension evaluation. J. Marketing 74(3):80–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moorman C (1998) Market-level effects of information: Competitive responses and consumer dynamics. J. Marketing Res. 35(1):82–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moorman RF, Huber J (2012) Unintended nutrition consequences: Firm responses to the nutrition labeling and education act. Marketing Sci. 31(5):717–737.Link, Google Scholar
• Nelson JP (2006) Cigarette advertising regulation: A meta-analysis. Internat. Rev. Law Econom. 26(2):195–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nohel T, Wang ZJ, Zheng L (2010) Side-by-side management of hedge funds and mutual funds. Rev. Financial Stud. 23(6):2342–2373.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ohrt D (2010) Is it time to drop the ‘annual’ in annual agency planning? Advertising Age (November 29), https://adage.com/article/small-agency-diary/advertising-annual-agency-planning-annual/147346.Google Scholar
• Park CW, Milberg S, Lawson R (1991) Evaluation of brand extensions: The role of product level similarity and brand concept consistency. J. Consumer Res. 18(2):185–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker PM (1995) Sweet lemons: Illusory quality, self-deceivers, advertising, and price. J. Marketing Res. 32(3):291–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Patrick AO (2009) Diageo serves up new campaign aimed at shoppers. Wall Street Journal (April 7), https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB123906172693095137.Google Scholar
• Peltzman S (1981) The effects of FTC advertising regulation. J. Law Econom. 24(3):403–448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petty RD (2015) The historic development of modern US advertising regulation. J. Historical Res. Marketing 7(4):524–548.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pollay RW, Siddarth S, Siegel M, Haddix A, Merritt RK, Giovino GA, Eriksen MP (1996) The last straw? Cigarette advertising and realized market shares among youths and adults. J. Marketing 60(1):1–16.Google Scholar
• Prasad A, Sen S (1999) Are firms advertising too much? Paper presented at INFORMS Marketing Sci. Conf.Google Scholar
• Rajiv S, Dutta S, Dhar SK (2002) Asymmetric store positioning and promotional advertising strategies: Theory and evidence. Marketing Sci. 21(1):74–96.Link, Google Scholar
• Rangaswamy A, Burke R, Oliver TA (1993) Brand equity and the extendibility of brand names. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 10(1):61–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reuter J, Zitzewitz E (2006) Do ads influence editors? Advertising and bias in the financial media. Quart. J. Econom. 121(1):197–227.Google Scholar
• Saffer H, Chaloupka F (2000) The effect of tobacco advertising bans on tobacco consumption. J. Health Econom. 19(6):1117–1137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sahni NS (2016) Advertising spillovers: Evidence from online field-experiments and implications for returns on advertising. J. Marketing Res. 53(4):459–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schneider L, Klein B, Murphy KM (1981) Governmental regulation of cigarette health information. J. Law Econom. 24(3):575–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro B (2016) Positive spillovers and free riding in advertising of prescription pharmaceuticals: The case of antidepressants. Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Shocker AD, Bayus BL, Kim N (2004) Product complements and substitutes in the real world: The relevance of “other products”. J. Marketing 68(1):28–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith DC, Park CW (1992) The effects of brand extensions on market share and advertising efficiency. J. Marketing Res. 29(3):296–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spiggle S, Nguyen HT, Caravella M (2012) More than fit: Brand extension authenticity. J. Marketing Res. 49(6):967–983.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stevenson A (2014) With ban on ads removed, hedge funds test waters. New York Times (February 20), https://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/02/20/with-ban-on-ads-lifted-hedge-funds-test-waters/.Google Scholar
• Stigler GJ, Friedland C (1962) What can regulators regulate? The case of electricity. J. Law Econom. 5(October):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sudhir K (2016) The exploration-exploitation tradeoff and efficiency in knowledge production. Marketing Sci. 35(1):1–9.Link, Google Scholar
• Tellis GJ, Franses PH (2006) Optimal data interval for estimating advertising response. Marketing Sci. 25(3):217–229.Link, Google Scholar
• Völckner F, Sattler H (2006) Drivers of brand extension success. J. Marketing 70(2):18–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Lewis M, Singh V (2016) The unintended consequences of countermarketing strategies: How particular antismoking measures may shift consumers to more dangerous cigarettes. Marketing Sci. 35(1):55–72.Link, Google Scholar
• Warner KE (1977) The effects of the anti-smoking campaign on cigarette consumption. Amer. J. Public Health 67:645–650.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weiss DL, Weinberg CB, Windal PM (1983) The effects of serial correlation and data aggregation on advertising measurement. J. Marketing Res. 20(3):268–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B (1988) Umbrella branding as a signal of new product quality: An example of signaling by posting a bond. RAND J. Econom. 19(3):458–466.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilcox C, Shepherd WG (1975) Public Policies Toward Business, 3rd ed. (Irwin, Homewood, IL).Google Scholar