Higher Minimum Quality Standards and Redistributive Effects on Consumer Welfare

References

• Allenby GM, Brazell J, Howell J, Rossi PE (2014) Economic valuation of product features. Quant. Marketing Econom. 12(4):421–456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allender WJ, Richards TJ (2010a) Consumer impact of animal welfare regulation in the California poultry industry. J. Agricultural Resource Econom. 35(3):424–442.Google Scholar
• Allender WJ, Richards TJ (2010b) Market diversion and market power: California eggs. Rev. Indust. Organ. 36(1):37–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andersen L (2011) Animal welfare and eggs—Cheap talk or money on the counter? J. Agricultural Econom. 62(3):565–584.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besanko D, Donnenfeld S, White LJ (1987) Monopoly and quality distortion: Effects and remedies. Quart. J. Econom. 102(4):743–768.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besanko D, Donnenfeld S, White LJ (1988) The multiproduct firm, quality choice, and regulation. J. Indust. Econom. 36(4):411–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bockstael NE (1984) The welfare implications of minimum quality standards. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 66(4):466–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buehler B, Schuett F (2014) Certification and minimum quality standards when some consumers are uninformed. Eur. Econom. Rev. 70(August):493–511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ching AT (2010) A dynamic oligopoly structural model for the prescription drug market after patent expiration. Internat. Econom. Rev. 51(4):1175–1207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crampes C, Hollander A (1995) Duopoly and quality standards. Eur. Econom. Rev. 39(1):71–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubé JP, Hitsch GJ, Rossi PE (2010) State dependence and alternative explanations for consumer inertia. RAND J. Econom. 41(3):417–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubois P, Griffith R, O’Connell M (2018) The effects of banning advertising in junk food markets. Rev. Econom. Stud. 85(1):396–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdem T, Keane MP, Sun B (2008) The impact of advertising on consumer price sensitivity in experience goods markets. Quant. Marketing Econom. 6(2):139–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fabra N, Reguant M (2014) Pass-through of emissions costs in electricity markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(9):2872–2899.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frank RG, Salkever DS (1992) Pricing, patent loss and the market for pharmaceuticals. Southern Econom. J. 59(2):165–179.Google Scholar
• Gamerman D, Lopes HF (2006) Markov Chain Monte Carlo: Stochastic Simulation for Bayesian Inference (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL).Google Scholar
• Grabowski HG, Vernon JM (1992) Brand loyalty, entry, and price competition in pharmaceuticals after the 1984 drug act. J. Law Econom. 35(2):331–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausman J (2003) Sources of bias and solutions to bias in the consumer price index. J. Econom. Perspect. 17(1):23–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim D, Cotterill RW (2008) Cost pass-through in differentiated product markets: The case of U.S. processed cheese. J. Indust. Econom. 56(1):32–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lapan H, Moschini G (2007) Grading, minimum quality standards, and the labeling of genetically modified products. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 89(3):769–783.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leland HE (1979) Quacks, lemons, and licensing: A theory of minimum quality standards. J. Political Econom. 87(6):1328–1346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malone T, Lusk JL (2016) Putting the chicken before the egg price: An ex post analysis of California’s battery cage ban. J. Agricultural Resource Econom. 41(3):518–532.Google Scholar
• Morrow WR, Skerlos SJ (2011) Fixed-point approaches to computing Bertrand-Nash equilibrium prices under mixed-logit demand. Oper. Res. 59(2):328–345.Link, Google Scholar
• Mullally C, Lusk JL (2018a) The impact of farm animal housing restrictions on egg prices, consumer welfare, and production in California. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 100(3):649–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mullally C, Lusk JL (2018b) The impact of farm animal housing restrictions on egg prices, consumer welfare, and production in California—Authors’ response to comment. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 100(3):674–675.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mussa M, Rosen S (1978) Monopoly and product quality. J. Econom. Theory 18(2):301–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nevo A (2001) Measuring market power in the ready-to-eat cereal industry. Econometrica 69(2):307–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Norwood FB (2011) The private provision of animal-friendly eggs and pork. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 94(2):509–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Norwood FB, Lusk JL (2009) The farm animal welfare debate. Choices 24(3), http://www.choicesmagazine.org/UserFiles/file/article_89.pdf.Google Scholar
• Norwood FB, Lusk JL (2011) A calibrated auction-conjoint valuation method: Valuing pork and eggs produced under differing animal welfare conditions. J. Environmental Econom. Management 62(1):80–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pachali MJ, Kurz P, Otter T (2018) How to generalize from a hierarchical model? Working paper, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.Google Scholar
• Panzar JC, Savage I (2011) Does a minimum quality standard always reduce the price of high quality products? B.E. J. Econom. Anal. Policy 11(1):1–30.Google Scholar
• Perloff JM, Salop SC (1985) Equilibrium with product differentiation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 52(1):107–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reiss PC, Wolak FA (2007) Structural econometric modeling: Rationales and examples from industrial organization. Heckman JJ, Leamer EE, eds. Handbook of Econometrics, vol. 6 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 4277–4415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rossi PE, Allenby GM, McCulloch R (2005) Bayesian Statistics and Marketing (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Ryan SP (2012) The costs of environmental regulation in a concentrated industry. Econometrica 80(3):1019–1061.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro C (1983) Premiums for high quality products as returns to reputations. Quart. J. Econom. 98(4):659–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Small KA, Rosen HS (1981) Applied welfare economics with discrete choice models. Econometrica 49(1):105–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sudhir K (2001) Structural analysis of manufacturer pricing in the presence of a strategic retailer. Marketing Sci. 20(3):244–264.Link, Google Scholar
• Sumner DA (2018) Comment on the impact of farm animal housing restrictions on egg prices, consumer welfare, and production in California. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 100(3):670–673.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sumner DA, Rosen-Molina JT, Matthews WA, Mench JA, Richter KR (2008) Economic effects of proposed restrictions on egg-laying hen housing in California. Report, Agricultural Issues Center, University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
• Train KE (2009) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas SB (2007) Vertical relationships between manufacturers and retailers: Inference with limited data. Rev. Econom. Stud. 74(2):625–652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ward MB, Shimshack JP, Perloff JM, Harris MJ (2002) Effects of the private-label invasion in food industries. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 84(4):961–973.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weyl EG, Fabinger M (2013) Pass-through as an economic tool: Principles of incidence under imperfect competition. J. Political Econom. 121(3):528–583.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zander K, Feucht Y (2018) Consumers’ willingness to pay for sustainable seafood made in Europe. J. Internat. Food Agribusiness Marketing 30(3):251–275.Crossref, Google Scholar