Getting a Break in Bargaining: An Upside of Time Delays

References

• Admati AR, Perry M (1987) Strategic delay in bargaining. Rev. Econom. Stud. 54(3):345–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ambrus A, Chaney E, Salitskiy I (2018) Pirates of the Mediterranean: An empirical investigation of bargaining with asymmetric information. Quant. Econom. 9(1):217–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arkes HR Blumer C (1985) The psychology of sunk cost. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 35(1):124–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arnold MA, Lippman SA (1998) Posted prices vs. bargaining in markets with asymmetric information. Econom. Inquiry 36(3):450–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Augenblick N (2016) The sunk-cost fallacy in penny auctions. Rev. Econom. Stud. 83(1):58–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Backus M, Blake T, Larsen B, Tadelis S (2020) Sequential bargaining in the field: Evidence from millions of online bargaining interactions. Quart. J. Econom. 135(3):1319–1361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bazerman MH, Samuelson WF (1983) I won the auction but don’t want the prize. J. Conflict Resolution 27(4):618–634.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bester H (1993) Bargaining vs. price competition in markets with quality uncertainty. Amer. Econom. Rev. 83(1):278–288.Google Scholar
• Chatterjee K, Samuelson L (1987) Bargaining with two-sided incomplete information: An infinite horizon model with alternating offers. Rev. Econom. Stud. 54(2):175–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Rosenthal RW (1996) On the use of ceiling-price as commitments by monopolists. RAND J. Econom. 27(2):207–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cotet M, Krajbich I (2021) Response times in the wild: eBay sellers take hours longer to reject high offers and accept low offers. Preprint, submitted March 15, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3804578.Google Scholar
• Cramton PC (1984) Bargaining with incomplete information: An infinite-horizon model with two-sided uncertainty. Rev. Econom. Stud. 51(4):579–593.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cramton PC (1991) Dynamic bargaining with transaction costs. Management Sci. 37(10):1221–1233.Link, Google Scholar
• Cramton PC (1992) Strategic delay in bargaining with two-sided uncertainty. Rev. Econom. Stud. 59(1):205–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cui TH, Mallucci P, Zhang ZJ (2019) To haggle or not to haggle? Pricing policy selection and collusion. Working paper, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
• Desai PS, Purohit D (2004) “Let me talk to my manager”: Haggling in a competitive environment. Marketing Sci. 23(2):219–233.Link, Google Scholar
• Dominitz J, Manski CF (1996) Eliciting student expectations of the returns to schooling. J. Human Resources 31(1):1–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dominitz J, Manski CF (1997) Using expectations data to study subjective income expectations. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 92(439):855–867.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festinger L (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, vol. 2 (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fong J, Waisman C (2023) The effects of delay in bargaining: Evidence from eBay. Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
• Freyberger J, Larsen BJ (2021) How well does bargaining work in consumer markets? A robust bounds approach. Working paper, Washington University at St. Louis, St. Louis.Google Scholar
• Galinsky AD, Mussweiler T (2001) First offers as anchors: The role of perspective-taking and negotiator focus. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 81(4):657–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gill D, Thanassoulis J (2016) Competition in posted prices with stochastic discounts. Econom. J. (London) 126(594):1528–1570.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Häubl G, Popkowski Leszczyc PTL (2019) Bidding frenzy: Speed of competitor reaction and willingness to pay in auctions. J. Consumer Res. 45(6):1294–1314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heyman JE, Orhun Y, Ariely D (2004) Auction fever: The effect of opponents and quasi-endowment on product valuations. J. Interactive Marketing 18(4):7–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hossain T (2019) Bargaining with learning. J. Math. Econom. 82:90–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hossain T, Okui R (2020) Belief formation under signal correlation. Working paper, University of Toronto, Mississauga, ON.Google Scholar
• Huang J (2018) The thrill of the deal: Quantifying the price of perceived discounts and mark-ups. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Jindal P (2022) Perceived vs. negotiated discounts: The role of advertised reference prices in price negotiations. J. Marketing Res. 59(3):578–599.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jindal P, Newberry PW (2018) To bargain or not to bargain—The role of fixed costs in price negotiations. J. Marketing Res. 55(6):832–851.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keniston D, Larsen BJ, Li S, Prescott JJ, Silveira BS, Yu C (2021) Fairness in incomplete information bargaining: Theory and widespread evidence from the field. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Konovalov A, Krajbich I (2023) Decision times reveal private information in strategic settings: Evidence from bargaining experiments. Econom. J. 133(656):3007–3033.Google Scholar
• Koo M, Fishbach A (2010) A silver lining of standing in line: Queuing increases value of products. J. Marketing Res. 47(4):713–724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kristensen H, Gärling T (1997) The effects of anchor points and reference points on negotiation process and outcome. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 71(1):85–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manski CF (2004) Measuring expectations. Econometrica 72(5):1329–1376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muthoo A (1999) Bargaining Theory with Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myatt DP, Rasmusen EB (2011) Posted prices vs. haggling: The economics of isoperfect price discrimination. Working paper, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
• Nash JF (1950) The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18(2):155–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Northcraft GB, Neale MA (1987) Experts, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring-and-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 39(1):84–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riley J, Zeckhauser R (1983) Optimal selling strategies: When to haggle, when to hold firm. Quart. J. Econom. 98(2):267–289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubinstein A (1982) Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica 50(1):97–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sobel J, Takahashi I (1983) A multistage model of bargaining. Rev. Econom. Stud. 50(3):411–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler RH (1985) Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Sci. 4(3):199–214.Link, Google Scholar
• Van de Calseyde PPFM, Keren G, Zeelenberg M (2014) Decision time as information in judgment and choice. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 125(2):113–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Poucke D, Buelens M (2002) Predicting the outcome of a two-party price negotiation: Contribution of reservation price, aspiration price and opening offer. J. Econom. Psych. 23(1):67–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang R (1995) Bargaining vs. posted-price selling. Eur. Econom. Rev. 39(9):1747–1764.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B (1994) Selling formats for search goods. Marketing Sci. 13(3):298–309.Link, Google Scholar
• Zeng X, Dasgupta S, Weinberg CB (2014) The effects of a “no-haggle” channel on marketing strategies. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 31(4):434–443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Manchanda P, Chu J (2021) “Meet me halfway”: The costs and benefits of bargaining. Marketing Sci. 40(6):1081–1105.Abstract, Google Scholar