Social and Spatiotemporal Impacts of Casino Jackpot Events

References

• Angrist JD, Pischke J-S (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barberis N (2012) A model of casino gambling. Management Sci. 58(1):35–51.Link, Google Scholar
• Blackwood K (2006) Casino Gambling for Dummies (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Clotfelter CT, Cook PJ (1993) The “gambler’s fallacy” in lottery play. Management Sci. 39(12):1521–1525.Link, Google Scholar
• Cooper DJ, Rege M (2011) Misery loves company: Social regret and social interaction effects in choices under risk and uncertainty. Games Econom. Behav. 73(1):91–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson R, Sundali J (2005) The gambler’s fallacy and the hot hand: Empirical data from casinos. J. Risk Uncertainty 30(3):195–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fafchamps M, Kebede B, Zizzo DJ (2015) Keep up with the winners: Experimental evidence on risk taking, asset integration, and peer effects. Eur. Econom. Rev. 79:59–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flepp R, Rüdisser M (2019) Revisiting the house money effect in the field: Evidence from casino jackpots. Econom. Lett. 181:146–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grochowski J (2005) Slot Machine Answer Book: How They Work, How They’ve Changed and How to Overcome the House Advantage (Bonus Books).Google Scholar
• Guryan J, Kearney MS (2008) Gambling at lucky stores: Empirical evidence from state lottery sales. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(1):458–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuhn PJ, Kooreman P, Soetevent AR, Kapteyn A (2008) The Own and Social Effects of an Unexpected Income Shock: Evidence from the Dutch Postcode Lottery. No. w14035 (National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuhn P, Kooreman P, Soetevent A, Kapteyn A (2011) The effects of lottery prizes on winners and their neighbors: Evidence from the Dutch postcode lottery. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(5):2226–2247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lahno AM, Serra-Garcia M (2015) Peer effects in risk taking: Envy or conformity? J. Risk Uncertainty 50(1):73–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller WC Jr (2020) American Gaming Association state of the states report. Accessed April 9, 2020, https://www.americangaming.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/AGA-2020-State_of_the_States.pdf.Google Scholar
• Mitton T, Vorkink K, Wright I (2018) Neighborhood effects on speculative behavior. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 151:42–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreno K, Kida T, Smith JF (2002) The impact of affective reactions on risky decision making in accounting contexts. J. Accounting Res. 40(5):1331–1349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nair HS, Misra S, Hornbuckle WJ IV, Mishra R, Acharya A (2017) Big data and marketing analytics in gaming: Combining empirical models and field experimentation. Marketing Sci. 36(5):699–725.Link, Google Scholar
• Narayanan S, Manchanda P (2012) An empirical analysis of individual level casino gambling behavior. Quantitative Marketing Econom. 10(1):27–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park HM, Manchanda P (2015) When Harry bet with Sally: An empirical analysis of multiple peer effects in casino gambling behavior. Marketing Sci. 34(2):179–194.Link, Google Scholar
• Schüll ND (2014) Addiction by Design: Machine Gambling in Las Vegas (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Tellis GJ, Franses PH (2006) Optimal data interval for estimating advertising response. Marketing Sci. 25(3):217–229.Link, Google Scholar
• Tellis GJ, Chandy RK, MacInnis D, Thaivanich P (2005) Modeling the microeffects of television advertising: Which ad works, when, where, for how long, and why? Marketing Sci. 24(3):359–366.Google Scholar
• Terrell D (1994) A test of the gambler’s fallacy: Evidence from pari-mutuel games. J. Risk Uncertainty 8(3):309–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler RH, Johnson EJ (1990) Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Sci. 36(6):643–660.Link, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 5(4):297–323.Google Scholar