Online Search and Optimal Product Rankings: An Empirical Framework

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2022.0071

References

  • Abaluck J, Compiani G, Zhang F (2020) A method to estimate discrete choice models that is robust to consumer search. Working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Aggarwal G, Feldman J, Muthukrishnan S, Pál M (2008) Sponsored search auctions with Markovian users. Papadimitriou C, Zhang S, eds. Internat. Workshop Internet Network Econom. (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg), 621–628.Google Scholar
  • Agrawal S, Avadhanula V, Goyal V, Zeevi A (2019) MNL-bandit: A dynamic learning approach to assortment selection. Oper. Res. 67(5):1453–1485.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Allcott H (2013) The welfare effects of misperceived product costs: Data and calibrations from the automobile market. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 5(3):30–66.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ansari A, Mela CF (2003) E-customization. J. Marketing Res. 40(2):131–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Armstrong M (2017) Ordered consumer search. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 15(5):989–1024.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Armstrong M, Vickers J (2015) Which demand systems can be generated by discrete choice? J. Econom. Theory 158(A):293–307.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ascarza E (2018) Retention futility: Targeting high-risk customers might be ineffective. J. Marketing Res. 55(1):80–98.Google Scholar
  • Athey S, Ellison G (2011) Position auctions with consumer search. Quart. J. Econom. 126(3):1213–1270.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bradlow ET, Fader PS (2001) A Bayesian lifetime model for the “hot 100” billboard songs. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 96(454):368–381.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bronnenberg BJ, Kim JB, Mela CF (2016) Zooming in on choice: How do consumers search for cameras online? Marketing Sci. 35(5):693–712.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chapman RG, Staelin R (1982) Exploiting rank ordered choice set data within the stochastic utility model. J. Marketing Res. 19(3):288–301.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y, Yao S (2017) Sequential search with refinement: Model and application with click-stream data. Management Sci. 63(12):4345–4365.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Choi H, Mela CF (2019) Monetizing online marketplaces. Marketing Sci. 38(6):948–972.AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Choi M, Dai AY, Kim K (2018) Consumer search and price competition. Econometrica 86(4):1257–1281.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De los Santos B, Koulayev S (2017) Optimizing click-through in online rankings with endogenous search refinement. Marketing Sci. 36(4):542–564.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Derakhshan M, Golrezaei N, Manshadi V, Mirrokni V (2022) Product ranking on online platforms. Management Sci. 68(6):4024–4041.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gallego G, Li A, Truong V-A, Wang X (2020) Approximation algorithms for product framing and pricing. Oper. Res. 68(1):134–160.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gardete P, Hunter M (2020) Guiding consumers through lemons and peaches: An analysis of the effects of search design activities. Stanford University Graduate School of Business Research Paper No. 3669, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  • Ghose A, Ipeirotis PG, Li B (2012) Designing ranking systems for hotels on travel search engines by mining user-generated and crowdsourced content. Marketing Sci. 31(3):493–520.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ghose A, Ipeirotis PG, Li B (2014) Examining the impact of ranking on consumer behavior and search engine revenue. Management Sci. 60(7):1632–1654.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Greminger RP (2022a) Heterogeneous position effects and the power of rankings. Preprint, submitted October 28, https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.16408.Google Scholar
  • Greminger RP (2022b) Optimal search and discovery. Management Sci. 68(5):3904–3924.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gu C, Wang Y (2022) Consumer online search with partially revealed information. Management Sci. 68(6):4215–4235.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hitsch GJ, Misra S, Zhang W (2018) Heterogeneous treatment effects and optimal targeting policy evaluation. Preprint, submitted February 6, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3111957.Google Scholar
  • Hodgson C, Lewis G (2020) You can lead a horse to water: Spatial learning and path dependence in consumer search. Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper 2246, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
  • Honka E, Chintagunta P (2017) Simultaneous or sequential? Search strategies in the US auto insurance industry. Marketing Sci. 36(1):21–42.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Honka E, Hortaçsu A, Vitorino MA (2017) Advertising, consumer awareness, and choice: Evidence from the US banking industry. RAND J. Econom. 48(3):611–646.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jagabathula S, Rusmevichientong P (2017) A nonparametric joint assortment and price choice model. Management Sci. 63(9):3128–3145.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jiang Z, Chan T, Che H, Wang Y (2021) Consumer search and purchase: An empirical investigation of retargeting based on consumer online behaviors. Marketing Sci. 40(2):219–240.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kempe D, Mahdian M (2008) A cascade model for externalities in sponsored search. Papadimitriou C, Zhang S, eds. Internat. Workshop Internet Network Econom. (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg), 585–596.Google Scholar
  • Kim JB, Albuquerque P, Bronnenberg BJ (2010) Online demand under limited consumer search. Marketing Sci. 29(6):1001–1023.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kleinberg R, Waggoner B, Glen Weyl E (2016) Descending price optimally coordinates search. Preprint, submitted March 24, https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.07682.Google Scholar
  • Kök AG, Fisher ML (2007) Demand estimation and assortment optimization under substitution: Methodology and application. Oper. Res. 55(6):1001–1021.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mehta N, Rajiv S, Srinivasan K (2003) Price uncertainty and consumer search: A structural model of consideration set formation. Marketing Sci. 22(1):58–84.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts JH, Lattin JM (1991) Development and testing of a model of consideration set composition. J. Marketing Res. 28(4):429–440.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Santu SKK, Sondhi P, Zhai C (2017) On application of learning to rank for e-commerce search. Proc. 40th Internat. ACM SIGIR Conf. Res. Development Inform. Retrieval (ACM, New York), 475–484.Google Scholar
  • Train K (2015) Welfare calculations in discrete choice models when anticipated and experienced attributes differ: A guide with examples. J. Choice Model. 16:15–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ursu RM (2018) The power of rankings: Quantifying the effect of rankings on online consumer search and purchase decisions. Marketing Sci. 37(4):530–552.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ursu RM, Dzyabura D (2020) Retailers’ product location problem with consumer search. Quant. Marketing Econom. 18:125–154.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ursu R, Seiler S, Honka E (2022) The sequential search model: A framework for empirical research. Preprint, submitted October 15, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4236738.Google Scholar
  • Weitzman ML (1979) Optimal search for the best alternative. Econometrica 47(3):641–654.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yao S, Mela CF (2011) A dynamic model of sponsored search advertising. Marketing Sci. 30(3):447–468.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zantedeschi D, Feit EM, Bradlow ET (2017) Measuring multichannel advertising response. Management Sci. 63(8):2706–2728.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.