Consumption Responses to an Unpopular Policy: Evidence from a Short-Lived Soda Tax

References

• Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller J (2010) Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: Estimating the effect of California’s tobacco control program. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 105(490):493–505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allcott H, Lockwood BB, Taubinsky D (2019) Regressive sin taxes, with an application to the optimal soda tax. Quart. J. Econom. 134(3):1557–1626.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allcott H, Boxell L, Conway J, Gentzkow M, Thaler M, Yang D (2020) Polarization and public health: Partisan differences in social distancing during the coronavirus pandemic. J. Public Econom. 191:104254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson ET, Simester DI (2008) Does demand fall when customers perceive that prices are unfair? The case of premium pricing for large sizes. Marketing Sci. 27(3):492–500.Link, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Krueger AB (1999) Empirical strategies in labor economics. Ashenfelter O, Card D, eds. Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 3A (Elsevier, North Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam), 1277–1366.Google Scholar
• Ansolabehere S, Palmer M, Lee A (2014) Precinct-level election data, 2002–2012. Harvard Dataverse, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/YN4TLR.Google Scholar
• Ballotpedia (2010a) Ballot measure campaign finance, 2010. Accessed January 5, 2023, https://ballotpedia.org/Ballot_measure_campaign_finance,_2010.Google Scholar
• Ballotpedia (2010b) Washington repeal tax law amendments, Initiative 1107 (2010). Accessed January 5, 2021, https://ballotpedia.org/Washington_Repeal_Tax_Law_Amendments,_Initiative_1107_(2010).Google Scholar
• Baltz S, Agadjanian A, Chin D, Curiel J, DeLuca K, Dunham J, Miranda J, et al. (2022) American election results at the precinct level. Sci. Data 9(1):651.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barone G, Mocetti S (2011) Tax morale and public spending inefficiency. Internat. Tax Public Finance 18:724–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bechwati NN, Morrin M (2003) Outraged consumers: Getting even at the expense of getting a good deal. J. Consumer Psych. 13(4):440–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besley T, Jensen A, Persson T (2021) Norms, enforcement, and tax evasion. Rev. Econom. Statist. 105(4):998–1007.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bollinger B, Sexton SE (2023) Local excise taxes, sticky prices, and spillovers: Evidence from Berkeley’s soda tax. Quant. Marketing Econom. 21(2):281–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bougie R, Pieters R, Zeelenberg M (2003) Angry customers don’t come back, they get back: The experience and behavioral implications of anger and dissatisfaction in services. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 31(4):377–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bronnenberg BJ, Dubé J-P, Sanders RE (2020) Consumer misinformation and the brand premium: A private label blind taste test. Marketing Sci. 39(2):382–406.Link, Google Scholar
• Bump P (2014) If there was ever a time when people regularly voted across party lines, it wasn’t recently. The Washington Post Online (September 17), https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2014/09/17/if-there-was-ever-a-time-when-people-regularly-voted-across-party-lines-it-wasnt-recently.Google Scholar
• Camden J (2014) Spin control: Drafting in dark messed up soda tax. The Spokesman Review Online (May 2), https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2010/may/02/drafting-in-dark-messed-up-soda-tax/.Google Scholar
• Cawley J, Frisvold DE (2017) The pass-through of taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages to retail prices: The case of Berkeley, California. J. Policy Anal. Management 36(2):303–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cawley J, Frisvold D, Hill A, Jones D (2019) The impact of the Philadelphia beverage tax on purchases and consumption by adults and children. J. Health Econom. 67:102225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cawley J, Frisvold D, Hill A, Jones D (2020) The impact of the Philadelphia beverage tax on prices and product availability. J. Policy Anal. Management 39(3):605–628.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chetty R, Looney A, Kroft K (2009) Salience and taxation: Theory and evidence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(4):1145–1177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ching AT, Osborne M (2020) Identification and estimation of forward-looking behavior: The case of consumer stockpiling. Marketing Sci. 39(4):707–726.Link, Google Scholar
• Ching A, Erdem T, Keane M (2009) The price consideration model of brand choice. J. Appl. Econometrics 24(3):393–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Costa DL, Kahn ME (2013) Energy conservation “nudges” and environmentalist ideology: Evidence from a randomized residential electricity field experiment. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11(3):680–702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cullen JB, Turner N, Washington EL (2021) Political alignment, attitudes toward government and tax evasion. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 13(3):135–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cummings RG, Martinez-Vazquez J, McKee M, Torgler B (2009) Tax morale affects tax compliance: Evidence from surveys and an artefactual field experiment. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 70(3):447–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, Gentzkow M (2019) Uniform pricing in US retail chains. Quart. J. Econom. 134(4):2011–2084.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubois P, Griffith R, O’Connell M (2020) How well targeted are soda taxes? Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(11):3661–3704.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eggers AC, Tuñón G, Dafoe A (2023) Placebo tests for causal inference. Amer. J. Political Sci. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Erdem T, Imai S, Keane MP (2003) Brand and quantity choice dynamics under price uncertainty. Quant. Marketing Econom. 1:5–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fortin B, Lacroix G, Villeval M-C (2007) Tax evasion and social interactions. J. Public Econom. 91(11–12):2089–2112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldstein K, Freedman P (2002) Lessons learned: Campaign advertising in the 2000 elections. Political Comm. 19(1):5–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2009) Boosting and additive trees. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, Chapter 10, Springer Series in Statistics (Springer, New York), 337–387.Google Scholar
• Hausman JA (1996) Valuation of new goods under perfect and imperfect competition. Bresnahan TF, Gordon RJ, eds. The Economics of New Goods, Chapter 5 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL), 207–248.Google Scholar
• Hendel I, Nevo A (2006) Measuring the implications of sales and consumer inventory behavior. Econometrica 74(6):1637–1673.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsiao C (2003) Analysis of Panel Data, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler R (1986) Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(4):728–741.Google Scholar
• Keller K, Guyt J, Grewal R (2024) Soda taxes and marketing conduct. J. Marketing Res. 61(3):393–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim JY, Ishihara M (2021) Evaluating the effect of soda taxes using a dynamic model of rational addiction. Preprint, submitted August 26, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3892506.Google Scholar
• Kim S, Lee C, Gupta S (2020) Bayesian synthetic control methods. J. Marketing Res. 57(5):831–852.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lamberton C, De Neve J-E, Norton MI (2018) The power of voice in stimulating morality: Eliciting taxpayer preferences increases tax compliance. J. Consumer Psych. 28(2):310–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luttmer EFP, Singhal M (2014) Tax morale. J. Econom. Perspect. 28(4):149–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin GJ, Yurukoglu A (2017) Bias in cable news: Persuasion and polarization. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(9):2565–2599.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Painter M, Qiu T (2021) Political beliefs affect compliance with government mandates. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 185:688–701.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peters J (2010) Soda taxes fizzle in wake of industry lobbying. The Washington Post Online (July 13), https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/13/AR2010071303494.html.Google Scholar
• Price V, Zaller J (1993) Who gets the news? Alternative measures of news reception and their implications for research. Public Opinion Quart. 57(2):133–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Richards TJ, Liaukonyte J, Streletskaya NA (2016) Personalized pricing and price fairness. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 44:138–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rojas C, Wang E (2021) Do taxes on soda and sugary drinks work? Scanner data evidence from Berkeley and Washington state. Econom. Inquiry 59(1):95–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scholz JT, McGraw KM, Steenbergen MR (1992) Will taxpayers ever like taxes? Responses to the US Tax Reform Act of 1986. J. Econom. Psych. 13(4):625–656.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seiler S, Tuchman A, Yao S (2021) The impact of soda taxes: Pass-through, tax avoidance, and nutritional effects. J. Marketing Res. 58(1):22–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sussman AB, Olivola CY (2011) Axe the tax: Taxes are disliked more than equivalent costs. J. Marketing Res. 48:S91–S101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trivedi M, Gauri DK, Ma Y (2017) Measuring the efficiency of category-level sales response to promotions. Management Sci. 63(10):3473–3488.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang EY (2015) The impact of soda taxes on consumer welfare: Implications of storability and taste heterogeneity. RAND J. Econom. 46(2):409–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xia L, Monroe KB, Cox JL (2004) The price is unfair! A conceptual framework of price fairness perceptions. J. Marketing 68(4):1–15.Crossref, Google Scholar