Making a Smooth Exit? Menthol Bans and Cigarette Sales in Massachusetts
References
- (2009) Estimating demand heterogeneity using aggregated data: An application to the frozen pizza category. Marketing Sci. 28(2):356–372.Link, Google Scholar
- (2022) Impact of massachusetts law prohibiting flavored tobacco products sales on cross-border cigarette sales. PLoS One 17(9):e0274022.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Synthetic difference-in-differences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 111(12):4088–4118.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Association of cigarette sales with comprehensive menthol flavor ban in Massachusetts. JAMA Internal Medicine 182(2):231–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Demand and distance: Evidence on cross-border shopping. J. Public Econom. 91(1–2):141–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) States & localities that have restricted the sale of flavored tobacco products. Accessed June 23, 2022, https://www.tobaccofreekids.org/assets/factsheets/0398.pdf.Google Scholar
- (2020) Assessing the sales impact of plain packaging regulation for cigarettes: Evidence from Australia. Marketing Sci. 39(1):234–252.Link, Google Scholar
- (1997) Market segmentation and the sources of rents from innovation: Personal computers in the late 1980s. RAND J. Econom. 28(0):S17–S44.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Tobacco product prices before and after a statewide tobacco tax increase. Tobacco Control 25(2):166–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
- California Department of Public Health California Tobacco Control Branch (2023) Frequently asked questions: California’s statewide flavored tobacco sales law. Accessed March 27, 2023, https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CCDPHP/DCDIC/CTCB/CDPH%20Document%20Library/Policy/FlavoredTobaccoAndMenthol/SB_793_FAQ_2_0_final2.pdf.Google Scholar
- (2021) Intended and unintended effects of banning menthol cigarettes. J. Law Econom. 64(3):629–650.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Evaluating a real world ban on menthol cigarettes: An interrupted time-series analysis of sales. Nicotine Tobacco Res. 22(4):576–579.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) A dynamic model of rational addiction with stockpiling and learning: An empirical examination of e-cigarettes. Management Sci. 66(12):5886–5905.Link, Google Scholar
- (2022) Evaluating the impact of menthol cigarette bans on cessation and smoking behaviours in Canada: Longitudinal findings from the Canadian arm of the 2016–2018 ITC four country smoking and vaping surveys. Tobacco Control 31(4):556–563.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1980) An almost ideal demand system. Amer. Econom. Rev. 70(3):312–326.Google Scholar
- (2018) Income and wealth effects on private-label demand: Evidence from the great recession. Marketing Sci. 37(1):22–53.Link, Google Scholar
- (2022) Evaluating the outcomes of the menthol cigarette ban in England by comparing menthol cigarette smoking among youth in England, Canada, and the US, 2018–2020. JAMA Network Open 5(5):e2210029.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Black smokers at center of New York fight to ban menthol cigarettes. New York Times (April 23), https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/23/nyregion/menthol-ban-black-smokers.html.Google Scholar
- (2022) Impact of Canada’s menthol cigarette ban on quitting among menthol smokers: Pooled analysis of pre–post evaluation from the ITC project and the Ontario menthol ban study and projections of impact in the USA. Tobacco Control 32(6):734–738.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) The case for the plain packaging of tobacco products. Addiction 103(4):580–590.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) What happens when a retailer drops a product category? Investigating the consequences of ending tobacco sales. Marketing Sci. 40(6):1169–1198.Abstract, Google Scholar
- (2022) Show and sell: Studying the effects of branded cigarette product placement in TV shows on cigarette sales. Marketing Sci. 41(6):1163–1180.Link, Google Scholar
- (2015) A dynamic model of rational addiction: Evaluating cigarette taxes. Marketing Sci. 34(3):452–470.Link, Google Scholar
- (2022) F.D.A. moves to ban sales of menthol cigarettes. New York Times (April 28), https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/28/health/menthol-ban-fda.html.Google Scholar
- (2021) Menthol cigarettes kill many black people. A ban may finally be near. New York Times (March 22), https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/22/health/methol-smoking-ban.html.Google Scholar
- (2022) Impact of Massachusetts’ statewide sales restriction on flavored and menthol tobacco products on tobacco sales in Massachusetts and surrounding states, June 2020. Amer. J. Public Health 112(8):1147–1150.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Are menthol cigarettes more addictive? A cross-category comparison of habit formation. Working paper, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
- (2014) Tobacco control environment in the United States and individual consumer characteristics in relation to continued smoking: Differential responses among menthol smokers? Preventive Medicine 65:47–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Quantifying the benefits of new products: The case of the minivan. J. Political Econom. 110(4):705–729.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Impact of CVS Pharmacy’s discontinuance of tobacco sales on cigarette purchasing (2012–2014). Amer. J. Public Health 107(4):556–562.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Estimates of cross-border menthol cigarette sales following the comprehensive tobacco flavor ban in Massachusetts. Preprint, submitted April 27, https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/27/2022.04.24.22274236.Google Scholar
- (2021) The impact of soda taxes: Pass-through, tax avoidance, and nutritional effects. J. Marketing Res. 58(1):22–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1954) The Measurement of Consumers’ Expenditure and Behaviour in the United Kingdom, 1920–1938, vol. 1 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
- (2019) Advertising and demand for addictive goods: The effects of e-cigarette advertising. Marketing Sci. 38(6):994–1022.Abstract, Google Scholar
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2009) Section 907 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act—Tobacco Product Standards. Accessed June 23, 2022, https://www.fda.gov/tobacco-products/rules-regulations-and-guidance/section-907-federal-food-drug-and-cosmetic-act-tobacco-product-standards.Google Scholar
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2013) Preliminary scientific evaluation of the possible public health effects of menthol vs. nonmenthol cigarettes. Accessed June 23, 2022, https://www.fda.gov/media/86497/download.Google Scholar
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2022a) FDA proposes rules prohibiting menthol cigarettes and flavored cigars to prevent youth initiation, significantly reduce tobacco-related disease and death. Accessed June 23, 2022, https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-proposes-rules-prohibiting-menthol-cigarettes-and-flavored-cigars-prevent-youth-initiation.Google Scholar
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2022b) Tobacco product standard for menthol in cigarettes. Accessed June 23, 2022, https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/05/04/2022-08994/tobacco-product-standard-for-menthol-in-cigarettes.Google Scholar
- (2022) US Food and Drug Administration action on menthol cigarettes and flavored cigars—A pivotal moment for health equity. JAMA Network Open 5(6):e2217150.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) The unintended consequences of countermarketing strategies: How particular antismoking measures may shift consumers to more dangerous cigarettes. Marketing Sci. 35(1):55–72.Link, Google Scholar
- (2021) Investigating the effects of excise taxes, public usage restrictions, and antismoking ads across cigarette brands. J. Marketing 85(3):150–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) The impact of a comprehensive tobacco product flavor ban in San Francisco among young adults. Addictive Behav. Rep. 11:100273.Crossref, Google Scholar

