Vertical Competition on a Common Platform

References

• Abhishek V, Jerath K, Zhang ZJ (2016) Agency selling or reselling? Channel structures in electronic retailing. Management Sci. 62(8):2259–2280.Link, Google Scholar
• Amacher GS, Koskela E, Ollikainen M (2005) Quality competition and social welfare in markets with partial coverage: New results. Bull. Econom. Res. 57(4):391–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson ET, Dana JD (2009) When is price discrimination profitable? Management Sci. 55(6):980–989.Link, Google Scholar
• Anderson EG, Parker GG, Tan B (2014) Platform performance investment in the presence of network externalities. Inform. Systems Res. 25(1):152–172.Link, Google Scholar
• Apple (2021) New study details how small businesses innovate on the App Store to reach customers around the world. Apple (June 2), https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2021/06/apple-developers-grow-app-store-ecosystem-billings-and-sales-by-24-percent-in-2020/.Google Scholar
• Ba S, Pavlou PA (2002) Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: Price premiums and buyer behavior. MIS Quart. 26(3):243–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bakos Y, Brynjolfsson E (1999) Bundling information goods: Pricing, profits, and efficiency. Management Sci. 45(12):1613–1630.Link, Google Scholar
• Bakos Y, Brynjolfsson E (2000) Bundling and competition on the internet. Marketing Sci. 19(1):63–82.Link, Google Scholar
• Bakos Y, Brynjolfsson E, Lichtman D (1999) Shared information goods. J. Law Econom. 42(1):117–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balachander S, Gal-Or E, Geylani T, Kim AJ (2017) Provision of optional versus standard product features in competition. J. Marketing 81(3):80–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balasubramanian S, Bhattacharya S, Krishnan VV (2015) Pricing information goods: A strategic analysis of the selling and pay-per-use mechanisms. Marketing Sci. 34(2):218–234.Link, Google Scholar
• Balseiro S, Lin M, Mirrokni V, Leme R, Song Zuo I (2017) Dynamic revenue sharing. von Luxburg U, Guyon I, Bengio S, Wallach H, Fergus R, eds. NIPS’17: Proc. 31st Internat. Conf. Neural Inform. Processing Systems (Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY), 2678–2686.Google Scholar
• Bart N, Chernonog T, Avinadav T (2021) Revenue-sharing contracts in supply chains: A comprehensive literature review. Internat. J. Production Res. 59(21):6633–6658.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhargava HK, Choudhary V (2008) Research note—When is versioning optimal for information goods? Management Sci. 54(5):1029–1035.Link, Google Scholar
• Bhargava H, Wang K, Zhang X (2022) Fending off critics of platform power with differential revenue sharing: Doing well by doing good? Management Sci. 68(11):7793–8514.Google Scholar
• Bonanno G (1986) Vertical differentiation with Cournot competition. Econom. Notes 15(2):68–91.Google Scholar
• Borck J, Caminade J, Wartburg M (2020) Apple’s app store and other digital marketplaces—A comparison of commission rates. Accessed May 10, 2025, https://www.analysisgroup.com/globalassets/insights/publishing/apples_app_store_and_other_digital_marketplaces_a_comparison_of_commission_rates.pdf.Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Hagiu A (2009) Platform rules: Multi-sided platforms as regulators. Gawer A, ed. Platforms, Markets and Innovation (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 163–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brock A (2024) What percentage cut does Steam take? NCESC (June 16), https://www.ncesc.com/gaming-pedia/what-percentage-cut-does-steam-take/.Google Scholar
• Casadesus-Masanell R, Llanes G (2015) Investment incentives in open-source and proprietary two-sided platforms. J. Econom. Management Strategy 24(2):306–324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chambers C, Kouvelis P, Semple J (2006) Quality-based competition, profitability, and variable costs. Management Sci. 52(12):1884–1895.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen Z (2003) Dominant retailers and the countervailing-power hypothesis. RAND J. Econom. 34(4):612–625.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen J, Fan M, Li M (2016) Advertising versus brokerage model for online trading platforms. MIS Quart. 40(3):575–596.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi CJ, Shin HS (1992) A comment on a model of vertical product differentiation. J. Indust. Econom. 40(2):229–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choudhary V (2010) Use of pricing schemes for differentiating information goods. Inform. Systems Res. 21(1):78–92.Link, Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C (2003) The digitization of word of mouth: Promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Management Sci. 49(10):1407–1424.Link, Google Scholar
• Desai PS (2001) Quality segmentation in spatial markets: When does cannibalization affect product line design? Marketing Sci. 20(3):265–283.Link, Google Scholar
• Desai P, Kekre S, Radhakrishnan S, Srinivasan K (2001) Product differentiation and commonality in design: Balancing revenue and cost drivers. Management Sci. 47(1):37–51.Link, Google Scholar
• Dukes A, Geylani T, Liu Y (2014) Dominant retailers’ incentives for product quality in asymmetric distribution channels. Marketing Lett. 25:93–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dukes AJ, Geylani T, Srinivasan K (2009) Strategic assortment reduction by a dominant retailer. Marketing Sci. 28(2):309–319.Link, Google Scholar
• Gabszewicz JJ, Shaked A, Sutton J, Thisse JF (1986) Segmenting the market: The monopolist’s optimal product mix. J. Econom. Theory 39(2):273–289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galbreth MR, Ghosh B, Shor M (2012) Social sharing of information goods: Implications for pricing and profits. Marketing Sci. 31(4):603–620.Link, Google Scholar
• Gal-Or E, Geylani T, Dukes AJ (2008) Information sharing in a channel with partially informed retailers. Marketing Sci. 27(4):642–658.Link, Google Scholar
• Geng X, Guo X, Xiao G (2022) Impact of social interactions on duopoly competition with quality considerations. Management Sci. 68(2):941–959.Link, Google Scholar
• Gu Z, Liu Y (2013) Consumer fit search, retailer shelf layout, and channel interaction. Marketing Sci. 32(4):652–668.Link, Google Scholar
• Ha AY, Tong S, Wang Y (2022) Channel structures of online retail platforms. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(3):1547–1561.Link, Google Scholar
• Hagiu A (2009) Two-sided platforms: Product variety and pricing structures. J. Econom. Management Strategy 18(4):1011–1043.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagiu A, Spulber D (2013) First-party content and coordination in two-sided markets. Management Sci. 59(4):933–949.Link, Google Scholar
• Heese HS, Swaminathan JM (2006) Product line design with component commonality and cost-reduction effort. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 8(2):206–219.Link, Google Scholar
• Highfill T, Surfield C (2022) New and revised statistics of the US digital economy, 2005–2021. Report, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Suitland, MD.Google Scholar
• Hsiao L, Chen YJ, Xiong H (2023) Commission, product quality and return policy in agency selling. Naval Res. Logist. 70(3):231–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsiao L, Ma X, Chen YJ (2024) The effects of selling formats and upstream competition on product pricing and quality design. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 26(4):1526–1541.Link, Google Scholar
• Huang P, Lyu G, Xu Y (2022) Quality regulation on two-sided platforms: Exclusion, subsidization, and first-party applications. Management Sci. 68(6):4415–4434.Link, Google Scholar
• Inderst R, Shaffer G (2007) Retail mergers, buyer power and product variety. Econom. J. 117(516):45–67.Google Scholar
• Jiang B, Jerath K, Srinivasan K (2011) Firm strategies in the “mid tail” of platform-based retailing. Marketing Sci. 30(5):757–775.Link, Google Scholar
• Jing B (2007) Network externalities and market segmentation in a monopoly. Econom. Lett. 95(1):7–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones R, Mendelson H (2011) Information goods vs. industrial goods: Cost structure and competition. Management Sci. 57(1):164–176.Link, Google Scholar
• Ke TT, Lin S (2020) Informational complementarity. Management Sci. 66(8):3699–3716.Link, Google Scholar
• Kim K, Chhajed D (2000) Commonality in product design: Cost saving, valuation change and cannibalization. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 125(3):602–621.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishnan V, Gupta S (2001) Appropriateness and impact of platform-based product development. Management Sci. 47(1):52–68.Link, Google Scholar
• Lambertini L, Orsini R (2001) Network externalities and the overprovision of quality by a monopolist. Southern Econom. J. 67(4):969–982.Google Scholar
• Lauga DO, Ofek E (2011) Product positioning in a two-dimensional vertical differentiation model: The role of quality costs. Marketing Sci. 30(5):903–923.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee RS (2013) Vertical integration and exclusivity in platform and two-sided markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(7):2960–3000.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lehmann-Grube U (1997) Strategic choice of quality when quality is costly: The persistence of the high-quality advantage. RAND J. Econom. 28(2):372–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li L, Chen J, Raghunathan S (2018) Recommender system rethink: Implications for an electronic marketplace with competing manufacturers. Inform. Systems Res. 29(4):1003–1023.Link, Google Scholar
• Li L, Chen J, Raghunathan S (2020) Informative role of recommender systems in electronic marketplaces: A boon or a bane for competing sellers. MIS Quart. 44(4):1957–1985.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin S (2017) Add-on policies under vertical differentiation: Why do luxury hotels charge for internet while economy hotels do not? Marketing Sci. 36(4):610–625.Link, Google Scholar
• Luo L, Kannan P, Ratchford BT (2007) New product development under channel acceptance. Marketing Sci. 26(2):149–163.Link, Google Scholar
• MacDonald G, Ryall MD (2004) How do value creation and competition determine whether a firm appropriates value? Management Sci. 50(10):1319–1333.Link, Google Scholar
• Marx LM, Shaffer G (2007) Upfront payments and exclusion in downstream markets. RAND J. Econom. 38(3):823–843.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moorthy KS (1984) Market segmentation, self-selection, and product line design. Marketing Sci. 3(4):288–307.Link, Google Scholar
• Moorthy KS (1988) Product and price competition in a duopoly. Marketing Sci. 7(2):141–168.Link, Google Scholar
• Mussa M, Rosen S (1978) Monopoly and product quality. J. Econom. Theory 18(2):301–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oh J, Koh B, Raghunathan S (2015) Value appropriation between the platform provider and app developers in mobile platform mediated networks. J. Inform. Tech. 30(3):245–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raju J, Zhang ZJ (2005) Channel coordination in the presence of a dominant retailer. Marketing Sci. 24(2):254–262.Link, Google Scholar
• Roth E (2020) Why is steam the most popular PC gaming platform? 6 things it does right. whatNerd (July 8), https://whatnerd.com/why-steam-most-popular-pc-gaming-platform/.Google Scholar
• Ryan JK, Sun D, Zhao X (2012) Competition and coordination in online marketplaces. Production Oper. Management 21(6):997–1014.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaked A, Sutton J (1982) Relaxing price competition through product differentiation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 49(1):3–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shugan SM, Moon J, Shi Q, Kumar NS (2017) Product line bundling: Why airlines bundle high-end while hotels bundle low-end. Marketing Sci. 36(1):124–139.Link, Google Scholar
• Shukla A (2025) Scope of GenAI in video game development in 2025. Anal. Vidhya (May 9), https://www.analyticsvidhya.com/blog/2025/01/genai-in-video-game-development/.Google Scholar
• Simmons J (2024) The financial impact of Steam on developers. Stepofweb (October), https://stepofweb.com/steams-cut-how-much-do-developers-lose/.Google Scholar
• Sundararajan A (2004) Nonlinear pricing of information goods. Management Sci. 50(12):1660–1673.Link, Google Scholar
• Tan B, Anderson EG Jr, Parker GG (2020) Platform pricing and investment to drive third-party value creation in two-sided networks. Inform. Systems Res. 31(1):217–239.Link, Google Scholar
• Vandenbosch MB, Weinberg CB (1995) Product and price competition in a two-dimensional vertical differentiation model. Marketing Sci. 14(2):224–249.Link, Google Scholar
• Varian HR (2000) Buying, sharing and renting information goods. J. Indust. Econom. 48(4):473–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wauthy X (1996) Quality choice in models of vertical differentiation. J. Indust. Econom. 44(3):345–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wei X, Nault BR (2008) Vertically differentiated information goods: Monopoly power through versioning. Unpublished paper, Haskayne School of Business, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.Google Scholar
• Wei X, Nault BR (2014) Monopoly versioning of information goods when consumers have group tastes. Production Oper. Management 23(6):1067–1081.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xiong H, Chen YJ, Hsiao L (2024) Developing a store brand or collecting a commission: Amazon’s choice and quality decision. Naval Res. Logist. 71(6):800–815.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Cao Q, He X (2019) Contract and product quality in platform selling. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 272(3):928–944.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zheng Y, Kaiser H (2013) Optimal quality threshold of admission in a two-sided farmers’ market. Appl. Econom. 45(23):3360–3369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou B, Zou T (2023) Competing for recommendations: The strategic impact of personalized product recommendations in online marketplaces. Marketing Sci. 42(2):360–376.Link, Google Scholar