Identifying State Dependence in Brand Choice: Evidence from Hurricanes

References

• Anupindi R, Dada M, Gupta S (1998) Estimation of consumer demand with stock-out based substitution: An application to vending machine products. Marketing Sci. 17(4):406–423.Link, Google Scholar
• Bai J (2009) Panel data models with interactive fixed effects. Econometrica 77(4):1229–1279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bass FM, Givon MM, Kalwani MU, Reibstein D, Wright GP (1984) An investigation into the order of the brand choice process. Marketing Sci. 3(4):267–287.Link, Google Scholar
• Bruno HA, Vilcassim NJ (2008) Research note—Structural demand estimation with varying product availability. Marketing Sci. 27(6):1126–1131.Link, Google Scholar
• Chamberlain G (1985) Heterogeneity, omitted variable bias, and duration dependence. Heckman JJ, Singer BS, eds. Longitudinal Analysis of Labor Market Data (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), 3–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conlon CT, Mortimer JH (2013) Demand estimation under incomplete product availability. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 5(4):1–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubé J-P, Hitsch GJ, Rossi PE (2009) Do switching costs make markets less competitive? J. Marketing Res. 46(4):435–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubé J-P, Hitsch GJ, Rossi PE (2010) State dependence and alternative explanations for consumer inertia. RAND J. Econom. 41(3):417–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubé J-P, Hitsch GJ, Rossi PE, Vitorino MA (2008) Category pricing with state-dependent utility. Marketing Sci. 27(3):417–429.Link, Google Scholar
• Figueroa C, Musalem A, Noton C (2021) Earthquakes and brand loyalty: Beyond the short-term effects of stockouts. Working paper, Boston College, Boston.Google Scholar
• Frank RE (1962) Brand choice as a probability process. J. Bus. 35(1):43–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ (1981) Heterogeneity and state dependence. Rose S, ed. Studies in Labor Markets (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 91–140.Google Scholar
• Jones JM, Landwehr JT (1988) Removing heterogeneity bias from logit model estimation. Marketing Sci. 7(1):41–59.Link, Google Scholar
• Keane M (1997) Modeling heterogeneity and state dependence in consumer choice behavior. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 15(3):310–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Massy WF (1966) Order and homogeneity of family specific brand-switching processes. J. Marketing Res. 3(1):48–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Musalem A, Olivares M, Bradlow ET, Terwiesch C, Corsten D (2010) Structural estimation of the effect of out-of-stocks. Management Sci. 56(7):1180–1197.Link, Google Scholar
• Paulson K (2012) Identification of structural state dependence in brand choice panel data. Working paper, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
• Seetharaman PB, Ainslie A, Chintagunta P (1999) Investigating household state dependence effects across categories. J. Marketing Res. 36(4):488–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonov A, Dubé J-P, Hitsch G, Rossi P (2020) State-dependent demand estimation with initial conditions correction. J. Marketing Res. 57(5):789–809.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sudhir K, Yang N (2014) Exploiting the choice-consumption mismatch: A new approach to disentangle state dependence and heterogeneity. Working paper, Yale School of Management, New Haven.Google Scholar
• Vulcano G, van Ryzin G, Ratliff R (2012) Estimating primary demand for substitutable products from sales transaction data. Oper. Res. 60(2):313–334.Link, Google Scholar
• Xu Y (2017) Generalized synthetic control method: Causal inference with interactive fixed effects models. Political Anal. 25(1):57–76.Crossref, Google Scholar