Job Security, Gender, and Sales Performance: Evidence from a Retail Sales Context

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2023.0233

References

  • Abraham K, Haltiwanger J, Sandusky K, Spletzer J (2018) Measuring the gig economy: Current knowledge and open issues. NBER Working Paper No. 24950, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. Google Scholar
  • Aguirregabiria V, Alonso-Borrego C (2014) Labor contracts and flexibility: Evidence from a labor market reform in Spain. Econom. Inquiry 52(2):930–957.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aigner DJ, Cain GG (1977) Statistical theories of discrimination in labor markets. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 30(2):175–187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Akerlof GA (1982) Labor contracts as partial gift exchange. Quart. J. Econom. 97(4):543–569.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allen ER (2016) Analysis of trends and challenges in the Indonesian labor market. Technical report, Asian Development Bank, Metro Manila, Philippines.Google Scholar
  • Alonso-Borrego C, Fernández-Villaverde J, Galdón-Sánchez JE (2001) A dynamic general equilibrium model of temporary contracts. Working paper, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Getafe, Spain.Google Scholar
  • Altonji JG, Pierret CR (2001) Employer learning and statistical discrimination. Quart. J. Econom. 116(1):313–350.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Altonji JG, Elder TE, Taber CR (2005) Selection on observed and unobserved variables: Assessing the effectiveness of catholic schools. J. Political Econom. 113(1):151–184.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson DA, Laughlin L (2020) Retail workers: 2018. Technical report, U.S. Census Bureau. Accessed May 20, 2024, https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2020/demo/acs-44.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Antecol H, Bedard K, Stearns J (2018) Equal but inequitable: Who benefits from gender-neutral tenure clock stopping policies? Amer. Econom. Rev. 108(9):2420–2441.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Araya S, Elberg A, Noton C, Schwartz D (2022) Identifying food labeling effects on consumer behavior. Marketing Sci. 41(5):982–1003.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ashenfelter O (1978) Estimating the effect of training programs on earnings. Rev. Econom. Statist. 60(1):47–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Autor DH, Kerr WR, Kugler AD (2007) Does employment protection reduce productivity? Evidence from US states. Econom. J. 117(521):F189–F217.Google Scholar
  • Babcock L, Recalde MP, Vesterlund L, Weingart L (2017) Gender differences in accepting and receiving requests for tasks with low promotability. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(3):714–747.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandiera O, Alfonsi L, Bassi V, Burgess R, Rasul I, Sulaiman M, Vitali A (2020) Tackling youth unemployment: Evidence from a labor market experiment in Uganda. ECTA 88(6):2369–2414.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bao W, Ni J, Singh S (2023) Educational inequality and reservation policy in developing markets. Management Sci. 70(5):3162–3181.Google Scholar
  • Bénabou R, Tirole J (2003) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Rev. Econ. Stud. 70(3):489–520.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benson A, Li D, Shue K (2023) “Potential” and the gender promotion gap. Preprint, submitted March 4, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4747175.Google Scholar
  • Blanchard O, Landier A (2002) The perverse effects of partial labour market reform: Fixed‐term contracts in France. Econom. J. 112(480):F214–F244.Google Scholar
  • Board S, Meyer-ter Vehn M (2013) Reputation for quality. Econometrica 81(6):2381–2462.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borusyak K, Jaravel X, Spiess J (2024) Revisiting event-study designs: Robust and efficient estimation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 91(6): 3253–3285.Google Scholar
  • Bowles S (1985) The production process in a competitive economy: Walrasian, Neo-Hobbesian, and Marxian models. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(1):16–36.Google Scholar
  • Cahuc P, Postel-Vinay F (2002) Temporary jobs, employment protection and labor market performance. Labour Econom. 9(1):63–91.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chan T, Li J, Pierce L (2014) Compensation and peer effects in competing sales teams. Management Sci. 60(8):1965–1984.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chung DJ, Narayandas D (2017) Incentives versus reciprocity: Insights from a field experiment. J. Marketing Res. 54(4):511–524.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chung DJ, Kim B, Park BG (2021) The comprehensive effects of sales force management: A dynamic structural analysis of selection, compensation, and training. Management Sci. 67(11):7046–7074.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Clark AE (2001) What really matters in a job? Hedonic measurement using quit data. Labour Econom. 8(2):223–242.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Datta N (2019) Willing to pay for security: A discrete choice experiment to analyse labour supply preferences. CEP Discussion Paper No. 1632, Centre for Economic Performance, London.Google Scholar
  • De Chaisemartin C, D’Haultfoeuille X (2022) Two-way fixed effects and differences-in-differences with heterogeneous treatment effects: A survey. NBER Working Paper No. 29691, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Delfgaauw J, Dur R, Sol J, Verbeke W (2013) Tournament incentives in the field: Gender differences in the workplace. J. Labor Econom. 31(2):305–326.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DellaVigna S, List JA, Malmendier U, Rao G (2022) Estimating social preferences and gift exchange at work. Amer. Econom. Rev. 112(3):1038–1074.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dolado J, Ortigueira S, Stucchi R (2016) Does dual employment protection affect tfp? Evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. SERIEs 1(7):421–459.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Engellandt A, Riphahn RT (2005) Temporary contracts and employee effort. Labour Econom. 12(3):281–299.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eurostat (2020) Employment by economic activity – Annual data. Accessed May 20, 2024, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/tesem060/default/table?lang=en.Google Scholar
  • Exley CL, Kessler JB (2022) The gender gap in self-promotion. Quart. J. Econom. 137(3):1345–1381.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibbs M, Mengel F, Siemroth C (2023) Work from home and productivity: Evidence from personnel and analytics data on information technology professionals. J. Political Econom. Microeconomics 1(1):7–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gneezy U, List JA (2006) Putting behavioral economics to work: Testing for gift exchange in labor markets using field experiments. Econometrica 74(5):1365–1384.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gneezy U, Rustichini A (2004) Gender and competition at a young age. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(2):377–381.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gneezy U, Niederle M, Rustichini A (2003) Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. Quart. J. Econom. 118(3):1049–1074.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gong S, Li Q, Su S, Zhang J (2024) Genes and sales. Management Sci. 70(6):3902–3922.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Heckman JJ, Hotz VJ (1989) Choosing among alternative nonexperimental methods for estimating the impact of social programs: The case of manpower training. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 84(408):862–874.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heckman JJ, Smith JA (1999) The pre-programme earnings dip and the determinants of participation in a social programme. implications for simple programme evaluation strategies. Econom. J. 109(457):313–348.Google Scholar
  • Holzer HJ, LaLonde RJ (1999) Job change and job stability among less-skilled young workers. Discussion Paper No. 1191-99, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Institute for Research on Poverty, Madison.Google Scholar
  • Hopenhayn H, Rogerson R (1993) Job turnover and policy evaluation: A general equilibrium analysis. J. Political Econom. 101(5):915–938.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hospido L, Laeven L, Lamo A (2022) The gender promotion gap: Evidence from central banking. Rev. Econom. Statist. 104(5):981–996.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ichino A, Moretti E (2009) Biological gender differences, absenteeism, and the earnings gap. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 1(1):183–218.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ichino A, Riphahn RT (2005) The effect of employment protection on worker effort: Absenteeism during and after probation. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 3(1):120–143.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • ILO (2024) Ilo modelled estimates and projections database (iloest). Accessed May 20, 2024, https://ilostat.ilo.org/data/.Google Scholar
  • ILO, OECD (2021) Women at work in G20countries: Policy action since 2020. Paper prepared for the 2nd meeting of the G20 employment working group under Italy’s presidency. Accessed May 20, 2024, https://www.oecd.org/gender/OECD-ILO-2021-Women-at-Work-Pölicy-Action-Since-2020-G20-Italy.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Jacob BA (2013) The effect of employment protection on teacher effort. J. Labor Econom. 31(4):727–761.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jahn EJ, Riphahn RT, Schnabel C (2012) Feature: Flexible forms of employment: Boon and bane. Econom. J. 122(562):F115–F124.Google Scholar
  • Jimeno JF, Toharia L (1996) Effort, absenteeism, and fixed term employment contracts. Revista Española de Economía 13(1):105–119.Google Scholar
  • Kalleberg AL (2000) Nonstandard employment relations: Part-time, temporary and contract work. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 26(1):341–365.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz LF, Krueger AB (2019) The rise and nature of alternative work arrangements in the United States, 1995–2015. ILR Rev. 72(2):382–416.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim M, Sudhir K, Uetake K (2022) A structural model of a multitasking salesforce: Incentives, private information, and job design. Management Sci. 68(6):4602–4630.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kim M, Sudhir K, Uetake K, Canales R (2019) When salespeople manage customer relationships: Multidimensional incentives and private information. J. Marketing Res. 56(5):749–766.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazear EP (2000) Performance pay and productivity. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(5):1346–1361.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li J, Lim N, Chen H (2020) Examining salesperson effort allocation in teams: A randomized field experiment. Marketing Sci. 39(6):1122–1141.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lim N, Ahearne MJ, Ham SH (2009) Designing sales contests: Does the prize structure matter? J. Marketing Res. 46(3):356–371.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Linz SJ, Semykina A (2012) What makes workers happy? Anticipated rewards and job satisfaction. Indust. Relat. 51(4):811–844.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mas A, Pallais A (2017) Valuing alternative work arrangements. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(12):3722–3759.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moretti E, Mas A (2009) Peers at work. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):112–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • OECD (2013) Protecting jobs, enhancing flexibility: A new look at employment protection legislation (chapter 2). OECD Employment Outlook 2013, OECD Publishing, Paris.Google Scholar
  • OECD (2020) Recent trends in employment protection legislation. OECD Employment Outlook 2020: Worker Security and the COVID-19 Crisis, OECD Publishing, Paris.Google Scholar
  • OECD (2023) Labour market statistics: Employment by permanency of the job: Incidence. OECD Publishing, Paris.Google Scholar
  • Ors E, Palomino F, Peyrache E (2013) Performance gender gap: Does competition matter? J. Labor Econom. 31(3):443–499.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oster E (2019) Unobservable selection and coefficient stability: Theory and evidence. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 37(2):187–204.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Persico N, Coviello D, Deserranno E (2022) Minimum wage and individual worker productivity: Evidence from a large US retailer. J. Political Econom. 130(9):2315–2360.Google Scholar
  • Rey P, Iossa E (2014) Building reputation for contract renewal: Implications for performance dynamics and contract duration. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 12(3):549–574.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ridlon R, Shin J (2013) Favoring the winner or loser in repeated contests. Marketing Sci. 32(5):768–785.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Riphahn RT, Thalmaier A (2001) Behavioral effects of probation periods: An analysis of worker absenteeism/anreizeffekte der probezeit: Eine untersuchung von fehlzeiten bei arbeitnehmern. J. Econom. Statist. 221(2):179–201.Google Scholar
  • Roth J, Sant’Anna PH, Bilinski A, Poe J (2023) What’s trending in difference-in-differences? A synthesis of the recent econometrics literature. J. Econometrics 235(2):2218–2244.Google Scholar
  • Shapiro C, Stiglitz JE (1984) Equilibrium unemployment as a worker discipline device. Amer. Econom. Rev. 74(3):433–444.Google Scholar
  • Taylor MS, Audia G, Gupta AK (1996) The effect of lengthening job tenure on managers’ organizational commitment and turnover. Organ. Sci. 7(6):632–648.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tommar SA, Kolokolova O, Mura R (2022) When paid work gives in to unpaid care work: Evidence from the hedge fund industry under covid-19. Management Sci. 68(8):6250–6267.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wozniak D, Harbaugh WT, Mayr U (2014) The menstrual cycle and performance feedback alter gender differences in competitive choices. J. Labor Econom. 32(1):161–198.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.