Comment on “Frontiers: The Interplay of User-Generated Content, Content Industry Revenues, and Platform Regulation: Quasi-Experimental Evidence from YouTube”

References

• Band J, Butler B (2013) Cautionary tales about collective rights organizations. Internat. Law Rev. 21(3):687.Google Scholar
• Lunney GS Jr (2019) Copyright and the 1%. Preprint, submitted March 18, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3338060.Google Scholar
• Tushnet R (2020) The Digital Millennium Copyright Act at 22: What is it, why was it enacted, and where are we now? Statement, Before the U.S. Senate, Committee on the Judiciary Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, February 11, Washington, DC. https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Tushnet%20Testimony.pdf.Google Scholar
• Urban JM, Karaganis J, Schofield B (2016) Notice and takedown in everyday practice. Preprint, submitted March 30, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2755628.Google Scholar
• Urban JM, Karaganis J, Schofield B (2017) Notice and takedown: Online service provider and rightsholder accounts of everyday practice. J. Copyright Soc’y U.S.A 64:371.Google Scholar
• Wlömert N, Papies D, Clement M, Spann M (2023) Frontiers: The interplay of user-generated content, content industry revenues, and platform regulation: Quasi-experimental evidence from YouTube. Marketing Sci. 43(1):1–12.Google Scholar