Welfare Effects of Personalized Rankings

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2023.1441

References

  • Abdollahpouri H, Adomavicius G, Burke R, Guy I, Jannach D, Kamishima T, Krasnodebski J, Pizzato L (2020) Multistakeholder recommendation: Survey and research directions. User Model. User-Adapted Interaction 30:127–158.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal D, Chen B-C, Elango P, Wang X (2012) Personalized click shaping through Lagrangian duality for online recommendation. SIGIR’12 Proc. 35th Internat. ACM SIGIR Conf. Res. Development Inform. Retrieval (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 485–494.Google Scholar
  • Anderson C (2006) The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business Is Selling Less of More (Hachette Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Armona L, Lewis G, Zervas G (2021) Learning product characteristics and consumer preferences from search data. Preprint, submitted June 3, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3858377.Google Scholar
  • Athey S, Imbens GW (2007) Discrete choice models with multiple unobserved choice characteristics. Internat. Econom. Rev. 48:1159–1192.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Athey S, Blei D, Donnelly R, Ruiz F, Schmidt T (2018) Estimating heterogeneous consumer preferences for restaurants and travel time using mobile location data. AEA Papers Proc. 108:64–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berry S, Levinsohn J, Pakes A (1995) Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica 63(4):841–890.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bobadilla J, Ortega F, Hernando A, Gutiérrez A (2013) Recommender systems survey. Knowledge-Based Systems 46:109–132.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bourreau M, Gaudin G (2022) Streaming platform and strategic recommendation bias. J. Econom. Management Strategy 31(1):25–47.Google Scholar
  • Carr D (2013) Giving viewers what they want. New York Times (February 24), https://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/25/business/media/for-house-of-cards-using-big-data-to-guarantee-its-popularity.html.Google Scholar
  • Chade H, Smith L (2006) Simultaneous search. Econometrica 74:1293–1307.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y, Yao S (2017) Sequential search with refinement: Model and application with click-stream data. Management Sci. 63(12):4345–4365.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Choi H, Mela CF (2019) Monetizing online marketplaces. Marketing Sci. 38(6):948–972.AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Chung JH, Chintagunta PK, Misra S (2023) Estimation of sequential search models. Working paper, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  • Compiani G, Lewis G, Peng S, Wang W (2021) Online search and product rankings: A double index approach. Preprint, submitted August 4, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3898134.Google Scholar
  • De los Santos B (2018) Consumer search on the internet. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 58:66–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De los Santos B, Koulayev S (2017) Optimizing click-through in online rankings with endogenous search refinement. Marketing Sci. 36(4):542–564.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • De Los Santos BI, Hortacsu A, Wildenbeest M (2012) Testing models of consumer search using data on web browsing and purchasing behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102:2955–2980.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Donnelly R, Ruiz FR, Blei D, Athey S (2019) Counterfactual inference for consumer choice across many product categories. Preprint, submitted June 6, https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.02635.Google Scholar
  • Dubé J-P, Misra S (2023) Personalized pricing and consumer welfare. J. Polit. Econom. 131(1):131–189.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elrod T, Keane MP (1995) A factor-analytic probit model for representing the market structure in panel data. J. Marketing Res. 32(1):1–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Faddoul M, Chaslot G, Farid H (2020) A longitudinal analysis of YouTube’s promotion of conspiracy videos. Preprint, submitted March 6, https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.03318.Google Scholar
  • Farrell MH, Liang T, Misra S (2020) Deep learning for individual heterogeneity. Preprint, submitted October 28, https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.14694.Google Scholar
  • Ferreira P, Zhang X, Belo R, Godinho de Matos M (2016) Welfare properties of recommender systems: Theory and results from a randomized experiment. Preprint, submitted October 21, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2856794.Google Scholar
  • Gardete PM, Antill MH (2019) Guiding consumers through lemons and peaches: A dynamic model of search over multiple characteristics. Working paper, Nova School of Business and Economics, Carcavelos, Portugal.Google Scholar
  • Goettler RL, Shachar R (2001) Spatial competition in the network television industry. RAND J. Econom. 624–656.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goli A, Reiley D, Hongkai Z (2021) Personalized versioning: Product strategies constructed from experiments on Pandora. PhD thesis, University of Chicago, Booth School of Business, Chicago.Google Scholar
  • Gopalan P, Hofman JM, Blei DM (2013) Scalable recommendation with Poisson factorization. Preprint, submitted November 7, https://arxiv.org/abs/1311.1704.Google Scholar
  • Greminger RP (2022) Heterogeneous position effects and the power of rankings. Working paper, UCL School of Management, London.Google Scholar
  • Holtz D, Carterette B, Chandar P, Nazari Z, Cramer H, Aral S (2020) The engagement-diversity connection: Evidence from a field experiment on Spotify. Preprint, submitted April 13, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3555927.Google Scholar
  • Honka E (2014) Quantifying search and switching costs in the US auto insurance industry. RAND J. Econom. 45:847–884.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Honka E, Chintagunta PK (2015) Simultaneous or sequential? Search strategies in the US auto insurance industry. Marketing Sci. 36(1):21–42.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Honka E, Hortaçsu A, Vitorino MA (2017) Advertising, consumer awareness, and choice: Evidence from the US banking industry. RAND J. Econom. 48:611–646.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hosanagar K, Krishnan R, Ma L (2008) Recommended for you: The impact of profit incentives on the relevance of online recommendations. ICIS 2008 Proc., 31.Google Scholar
  • Jacobs BJ, Donkers B, Fok D (2016) Model-based purchase predictions for large assortments. Marketing Sci. 35(3):389–404.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jannach D, Adomavicius G (2017) Price and profit awareness in recommender systems. Preprint, submitted July 25, https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.08029.Google Scholar
  • Jannach D, Resnick P, Tuzhilin A, Zanker M (2016) Recommender systems: Beyond matrix completion. Commun. ACM 59:94–102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keane M (2004) Modeling health insurance choice using the heterogeneous logit model. MPRA Paper. Working paper, Carey Business School, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  • Kim JB, Albuquerque P, Bronnenberg BJ (2010) Online demand under limited consumer search. Marketing Sci. 29(6):1001–1023.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kim JB, Albuquerque P, Bronnenberg BJ (2016) The probit choice model under sequential search with an application to online retailing. Management Sci. 63(11):3911–3929.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Koene A, Clifton C, Hatada Y, Webb H, Richardson R (2019) A governance framework for algorithmic accountability and transparency. Working paper, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
  • Koren Y, Bell R, Volinsky C (2009) Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. Computer 42:30–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • L’Ecuyer P, Maillé P, Stier-Moses NE, Tuffin B (2017) Revenue-maximizing rankings for online platforms with quality-sensitive consumers. Oper. Res. 65(2):408–423.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lee D, Hosanagar K (2019) How do recommender systems affect sales diversity? A cross-category investigation via randomized field experiment. Inform. Systems Res. 30:239–259.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • MacKenzie I, Meyer C, Noble S (2013) How retailers can keep up with consumers. Accessed April 21, 2023, https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/retail/our-insights/how-retailers-can-keep-up-with-consumers.Google Scholar
  • Mangalindan J (2012) Amazon’s recommendation secret. https://fortune.com/2012/07/30/amazons-recommendation-secret/.Google Scholar
  • McBride S (2014) Written direct testimony of Stephan McBride (on behalf of Pandora Media, Inc.). Accessed April 21, 2023, https://www.crb.gov/rate/16-CRB-0003-PR/statements/pandora/statement.pdf.Google Scholar
  • McFadden D (1981) Econometric models of probabilistic choice. Manski CF, McFadden D, eds. Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications (MIT Press, Cambridge, MD), 198–272.Google Scholar
  • Moraga-González JL, Sándor Z, Wildenbeest MR (2015) Consumer search and prices in the automobile market. IESE Research Papers D/1123, IESE Business School. Preprint, submitted May 15, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2609338.Google Scholar
  • Morozov I, Seiler S, Dong X, Hou L (2021) Estimation of preference heterogeneity in markets with costly search. Marketing Sci. 40(5):871–899.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Narayanan S, Kalyanam K (2015) Position effects in search advertising and their moderators: A regression discontinuity approach. Marketing Sci. 34(3):388–407.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Panniello U, Hill S, Gorgoglione M (2016) The impact of profit incentives on the relevance of online recommendations. Electronic Commerce Res. Appl. 20:87–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Punj GN, Staelin R (1978) The choice process for graduate business schools. J. Marketing Res. 15:588–598.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rossi PE, Allenby GM, McCulloch R (2012) Bayesian Statistics and Marketing (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK).Google Scholar
  • Rossi PE, McCulloch RE, Allenby GM (1996) The value of purchase history data in target marketing. Marketing Sci. 15(4):321–340.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Roth C, Mazières A, Menezes T (2020) Tubes and bubbles topological confinement of YouTube recommendations. PLoS One 15:e0231703.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ruiz FJ, Athey S, Blei DM (2020) Shopper: A probabilistic model of consumer choice with substitutes and complements. Ann. Appl. Statist. 14:1–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schnabel T, Swaminathan A, Singh A, Chandak N, Joachims T (2016) Recommendations as treatments: Debiasing learning and evaluation. Preprint, submitted February 17, https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.05352.Google Scholar
  • Solsman JE (2018) YouTube’s AI is the puppet master over most of what you watch. Accessed April 21, 2023, https://www.cnet.com/news/youtube-ces-2018-neal-mohan.Google Scholar
  • Titsias MK (2016) One-vs-each approximation to softmax for scalable estimation of probabilities. Preprint, submitted September 23, https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.07410.Google Scholar
  • Underwood C (2019) Use cases of recommendation systems in business—Current applications and methods. Accessed April 21, 2023, https://emerj.com/ai-sector-overviews/use-cases-recommendation-systems/.Google Scholar
  • Ursu RM (2018) The power of rankings: Quantifying the effect of rankings on online consumer search and purchase decisions. Marketing Sci. 37(4):530–552.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wan M, Wang D, Goldman M, Taddy M, Rao J, Liu J, Lymberopoulos D, McAuley J (2017) Modeling consumer preferences and price sensitivities from large-scale grocery shopping transaction logs. WWW’17 Proc. 26th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web (International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Geneva), 1103–1112.Google Scholar
  • Wang Y, Tao L, Zhang X (2022a) Recommending for a three-sided food delivery marketplace: A multi-objective hierarchical approach. Working paper, Google Brain, Mountain View, CA.Google Scholar
  • Wang Y, Tao L, Zhang X (2022b) Recommending for a multi-sided marketplace with heterogeneous contents. Proc. 16th ACM Conf. Recommender Systems (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 456–459.Google Scholar
  • Weitzman ML (1979) Optimal search for the best alternative. Econometrica 47:641–654.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yavorsky D, Honka E (2020) Consumer search in the US auto industry: The value of dealership visits. Preprint, submitted January 1, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3499305.Google Scholar
  • Zhou B, Zou T (2021) Competing for recommendations: The strategic impact of personalized product recommendations in online marketplaces. Preprint, submitted January 21, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3761350.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.