Put Your Mouth Where Your Money Is: A Field Experiment Encouraging Donors to Share About Charity

References

• Agerström J, Carlsson R, Nicklasson L, Guntell L (2016) Using descriptive social norms to increase charitable giving: The power of local norms. J. Econom. Psychol. 52:147–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Rao JM, Trachtman H (2017) Avoiding the ask: A field experiment on altruism, empathy, and charitable giving. J. Political Econom. 125(3):625–653.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Bracha A, Meier S (2009) Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):544–545.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagwell LS, Bernheim BD (1996) Veblen effects in a theory of conspicuous consumption. Amer. Econom. Rev. 1:349–373.Google Scholar
• Bakshy E, Eckles D, Yan R, Rosenn I (2012) Social influence in social advertising: Evidence from field experiments. Proc. 13th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (ACM, New York), 146–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barasch A, Berman JZ, Small DA (2016) When payment undermines the pitch: On the persuasiveness of pure motives in fund-raising. Psych. Sci. 27(10):1388–1397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J (2014) Word of mouth and interpersonal communication: A review and directions for future research. J. Consumer Psychol. 24:586–607.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Schwartz EM (2011) What drives immediate and ongoing word of mouth? J. Marketing Res 48(5):869–880.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berman JZ, Silver I (2022) Prosocial behavior and reputation: When does doing good lead to looking good? Curr. Opin. Psychol. 43:102–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berman JZ, Barasch A, Levine EE, Small DA (2018) Impediments to effective altruism: The role of subjective preferences in charitable giving. Psychol. Sci. 29(5):834–844.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berman JZ, Levine EE, Barasch A, Small DA (2015) The Braggart’s dilemma: On the social rewards and penalties of advertising prosocial behavior. J. Marketing Res. 52:90–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berman R, Van den Bulte C (2022) False discovery in A/B testing. Management Sci. 68(9):6762–6782.Link, Google Scholar
• Blaine BE (2018) Winsorizing. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation (Thousand Oaks, CA), 1817.Google Scholar
• Caviola L, Faulmüller N, Everett JA, Savulescu J (2014) The evaluability bias in charitable giving: Saving administration costs or saving lives? Judgment Decision Making 9(4):303–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cragg JG (1971) Some statistical models for limited dependent variables with application to the demand for durable goods. Econometrica 39:829–844.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Critcher CR, Dunning D (2011) No good deed goes unquestioned: Cynical reconstruals maintain belief in the power of self-interest. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 47:1207–1213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Freitas J, DeScioli P, Thomas KA, Pinker S (2019) Maimonides’ ladder: States of mutual knowledge and the perception of charitability. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 148:158–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, List JA, Malmendier U (2012) Testing for altruism and social pressure in charitable giving. Quart J. Econom. 127(1):1–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubé JP, Luo X, Fang Z (2017) Self-signaling and prosocial behavior: A cause marketing experiment. Marketing Sci. 36(2):161–186.Link, Google Scholar
• Elster J (1989) Social norms and economic theory. J. Econom. Perspect. 3(4):99–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engagement Labs (2017) New study finds that 19% of sales driven by consumer conversation. Accessed January 31, 2021, https://www.engagementlabs.com/press/new-study-finds-19-percent-sales-driven-consumer-conversations-taking-place-offline-online/.Google Scholar
• Flynn FJ, Lake VK (2008) If you need help, just ask: Underestimating compliance with direct requests for help. J. Personality Soc. Psychol. 95(1):128–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gershon R, Cryder C, John LK (2020) Why prosocial referral incentives work: The interplay of reputational benefits and action costs. J. Marketing Res. 57(1):156–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghosh S, Thomke S, Pourkhalkhali H (2020) The effects of hierarchy on learning and performance in business experimentation. Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 20-081.Google Scholar
• Gilovich T, Medvec VH, Savitsky K (2000) The spotlight effect in social judgment: An egocentric bias in estimates of the salience of one’s own actions and appearance. J. Personality Soc. Psychol. 78(2):211–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godes D, Mayzlin D (2004) Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Sci. 23(4):545–560.Link, Google Scholar
• Godes D, Mayzlin D, Chen Y, Das S, Dellarocas C, Pfeiffer B, Libai B, Sen S, Shi M, Verlegh P (2005) The firm’s management of social interactions. Marketing Lett. 16(3):415–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godes D, Mayzlin D (2009) Firm-created word-of-mouth communication: Evidence from a field test. Marketing Sci. 28(4):721–739.Link, Google Scholar
• Goldstein NJ, Cialdini RB, Griskevicius V (2008) A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. J. Consumer Res. 35(3):472–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hardy CL, Van Vugt M (2006) Nice guys finish first: The competitive altruism hypothesis. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 32(10):1402–1413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang S, Aral S, Hu YJ, Brynjolfsson E (2020) Social advertising effectiveness across products: A large-scale field experiment. Marketing Sci. 39(6):1142–1165.Link, Google Scholar
• Iyengar R, Van den Bulte C, Valente TW (2011) Opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Marketing Sci. 30:195–212.Link, Google Scholar
• Jung MH, Nelson LD, Gneezy U, Gneezy A (2017) Signaling virtue: Charitable behavior under consumer elective pricing. Marketing Sci. 36(2):187–194.Link, Google Scholar
• Karlan D, List JA (2007) Does price matter in charitable giving? Evidence from a large-scale natural field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(5):1774–1793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraft-Todd G, Yoeli E, Bhanot S, Rand D (2015) Promoting cooperation in the field. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 3:96–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis RA, Rao JM (2015) The unfavorable economics of measuring the returns to advertising. Quart. J. Econom. 130(4):1941–1973.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacAskill W (2015) Doing Good Better: Effective Altruism and a Radical New Way to Make a Difference (Guardian Faber Publishing, New York).Google Scholar
• Miller DT, Ratner RK (1998) The disparity between the actual and assumed power of self-interest. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 74(1):53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Munz KP, Jung MH, Alter AL (2020) Name similarity encourages generosity: A field experiment in email personalization. Marketing Sci. 39(6):1071–1091.Link, Google Scholar
• Nielsen (2012) Global trust in advertising and brand messages. Accessed January 31, 2021, https://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/report/2012/global-trust-in-advertising-and-brand-messages-2/#.Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum PR (2007) Interference between units in randomized experiments. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 102(477):191–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schlosser AE (2020) Self-disclosure vs. self-presentation on social media. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 31:1–6.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Silver I, Shaw A (2022) When and why “staying out of it” backfires in moral and political disagreements. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 151(10):2542–2561.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Silver I, Newman GE, Small DA (2021) Inauthenticity Aversion: Consumer reactance to tainted actors, actions, and objects. Consumer Psychol. Rev. 4(1):70–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Small DA, Berman JZ, Levine EE, Barasch A (2018) Should you broadcast your charitable side? Behavioral Scientist. Accessed January 31, 2021, https://behavioralscientist.org/should-you-broadcast-your-charitable-side.Google Scholar
• Sudhir K, Roy S, Cherian M (2016) Do sympathy biases induce charitable giving? The effects of advertising content. Marketing Sci. 35:849–869.Link, Google Scholar
• Toubia O, Stephen AT (2013) Intrinsic vs. image-related utility in social media: Why do people contribute content to Twitter? Marketing Sci. 32(3):368–392.Link, Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C, Bayer E, Skiera B, Schmitt P (2018) How customer referral programs turn social capital into economic capital. J. Marketing Res. 55(1):132–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wolters HM, Schulze C, Gedenk K (2020) Referral reward size and new customer profitability. Marketing Sci. 39(6):1166–1180.Link, Google Scholar
• Yang AK, Hsee CK (2022) Obligatory publicity increases charitable acts. J. Consumer Res. 48(5):839–857.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zaki J, Cikara M (2020) Don’t be afraid to virtue signal. TIME (June 25), https://time.com/5859459/in-defense-of-virtue-signaling-2/.Google Scholar
• Zlatev JJ, Kupor DM, Laurin K, Miller DT (2020) Being “good” or “good enough”: Prosocial risk and the structure of moral self-regard. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 118(2):242.Crossref, Google Scholar