Research Note Consumer Addressability and Customized Pricing

References

  • Borenstein Severin. Price discrimination in free-entry markets. RAND J. Econ. (1985) 16:380–397CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blattberg Robert C., Deighton John. Interactive marketing: exploiting the age of addressability. Sloan Management Rev. (1991) Fall):5–14Google Scholar
  • Chen Yuxin, Narasimhan Chakravarthi, Zhang Z. J. Individual marketing with imperfect targetability. Marketing Sci. (2001) 20:23–41LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fudenberg Drew, Tirole Jean. Customer poaching and brand switching. RAND J. Econom. (2000) 31:634–657CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmes Thomas. The effects of third-degree price discrimination in oligopoly. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1989) 79:244–250Google Scholar
  • Iyer Ganesh, Soberman David. Markets for product modification information. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19:203–225LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moorthy K. S. Price and product competition in a duopoly. Marketing Sci. (1988) 7:141–168LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Narasimhan Chakravarthi. Competitive promotional strategies. J. Bus. (1988) 61:427–449CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salop Steven. Monopolistic competition with outside goods. Bell J. Econom. (1979) 10:141–156CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sarvary Miklos, Parker Philip M. Marketing information: A competitive analysis. Marketing Sci. (1997) 16:24–38LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shaffer Greg, Zhang Z. J. Competitive coupon targeting. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14:395–416LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shaked Avner, Sutton John. Relaxing price competition through product differentiation. Review Econom. Stud. (1982) 49:3–13CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stokey N. Job differentiation and wages. Quart. J. Econom. (1980) 95:431–449CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thisse Jacques-Francois, Vives Xavier. On the strategic choice of spatial price policy. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1988) 78:122–137Google Scholar
  • Varian R. Hal. A model of sales. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1980) 70:651–659Google Scholar
  • Villas-Boas Miguel J. Dynamic competition with customer recognition. RAND J. Econom. (1999) 30:604–631CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.