Organizational Buyers’ Acceptance of Electronic Procurement Services—An Empirical Investigation in Indian Firms

References

• Aboelmaged MG (2010) Predicting e-procurement adoption in a developing country: An empirical integration of technology acceptance model and theory of planned behavior. Indust. Management Data Systems 110(3):392–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Prasad J (1998) The antecedents and consequents of user perceptions in information technology adoption. Decision Support Systems 22(1):15–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Prasad J (1999) Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies? Decision Sci. 30(2):361–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Prasad J (2000) A field study of the adoption of software process innovations by information systems professionals. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 47(3):295–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1980) Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behaviour (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Amoako-Gyampah K, Salam AF (2004) An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment. Inform. Management 41(6):731–745.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson JC, Gerbing DW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol. Bull. 103(3):411–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagozzi RP (2007) The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 8(4):244–254.Google Scholar
• Baron JP, Shaw MJ, Bailey AD (2000) Web-based e-catalog systems in B2B procurement. Comm. ACM 43(5):93–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee A, Hikmet N (2008) Reconceptualizing organizational support and its effect on information technology usage: Evidence from the health care sector. J. Comput. Inform. Systems 48(4):69–76.Google Scholar
• Brinkhoff A, Özer Ö, Sargut G (2014) All you need is trust? An examination of inter-organizational supply chain projects. Production Oper. Management 24(2):181–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown SA, Venkatesh V, Goyal S (2012) Expectation confirmation in technology use. Inform. Systems Res. 23(2):474–487.Link, Google Scholar
• Chang HH, Wong KH (2010) Adoption of e-procurement and participation of e-marketplace on firm performance: Trust as a moderator. Inform. Management 47(5):262–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterjee D, Grewal R, Sambamurthy V (2002) Shaping up for e-commerce: Institutional enablers of the organizational assimilation of Web technologies. MIS Quart. 26(2):65–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chin WW (1998) The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods Bus. Res. 295(2):295–336.Google Scholar
• Chin WW, Marcolin BL, Newsted PR (2003) A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Inform. Systems Res. 14(2):189–217.Link, Google Scholar
• Chircu AM, Davis GB, Kauffman RJ (2000) Trust, expertise, and e-commerce intermediary adoption. Chung HM, ed. The 2000 Americas Conf. Infrom. Systems (AMCIS Proc.), Long Beach, CA, 710–716.Google Scholar
• Cooper RB, Zmud RW (1990) Information technology implementation research: A technological diffusion approach. Management Sci. 36(2):123–139.Link, Google Scholar
• Croom S, Brandon-Jones A (2007) Impact of e-procurement: Experiences from implementation in the UK public sector. J. Purchasing Supply Management 13(4):294–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. 13(3):319–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis FD, Venkatesh V (2004) Toward preprototype user acceptance testing of new information systems: Implications for software project management. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 51(1):31–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Sci. 35(8):982–1003.Link, Google Scholar
• Devaraj S, Kohli R (2003) Performance impacts of information technology: Is actual usage the missing link? Management Sci. 49(3):273–289.Link, Google Scholar
• Doll WJ (1985) Avenues for top management involvement in successful MIS development. MIS Quart. 9(1):17–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Bookstein FL (1982) Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. J. Marketing Res. 19(4):440–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galletta DF, Ahuja M, Hartman A, Teo T, Peace AG (1995) Social influence and end-user training. Comm. ACM 38(7):70–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallivan MJ, Spitler VK, Koufaris M (2003) Does information technology training really matter? A social information processing analysis of coworkers’ influence on IT usage in the workplace. J. Management Inform. Systems 22(1):153–192.Google Scholar
• Gefen D (2004) What makes an ERP implementation relationship worthwhile: Linking trust mechanisms and ERP usefulness. J. Management Inform. Systems 21(1):263–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gefen D, Straub DW (2003) Managing user trust in B2C e-services. E-Service J. 2(2):7–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grover V (1993) An empirically derived model for the adoption of customer-based interorganizational systems. Decision Sci. 24(3):603–640.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gunasekaran A, Ngai EW (2008) Adoption of e-procurement in Hong Kong: An empirical research. Internat. J. Production Econom. 113(1):159–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gunasekaran A, McGaughey RE, Ngai EW, Rai BK (2009) E-procurement adoption in the southcoast SMEs. Internat. J. Production Econom. 122(1):161–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta R, Jain K (2014) Adoption of mobile telephony in rural India: An empirical study. Decision Sci. 45(2):281–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ha S, Stoel L (2009) Consumer e-shopping acceptance: Antecedents in a technology acceptance model. J. Bus. Res. 62(5):565–571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong S, Thong JY, Tam, KY (2006) Understanding continued information technology usage behavior: A comparison of three models in the context of mobile internet. Decision Support Systems 42(3):1819–1834.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu MH, Chiu CM (2004) Predicting electronic service continuance with a decomposed theory of planned behaviour. Behaviour Inform. Technol. 23(5):359–373.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hulland J (1999) Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management J. 20(2):195–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hwang Y (2005) Investigating enterprise systems adoption: Uncertainty avoidance, intrinsic motivation, and the technology acceptance model. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 14(2):150–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Igbaria M, Iivari J (1995) The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage. Omega 23(6):587–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Igbaria M, Zinatelli N, Cragg P, Cavaye AL (1997) Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: A structural equation model. MIS Quart. 21(3):279–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jasperson JS, Carter PE, Zmud RW (2005) A comprehensive conceptualization of post-adoptive behaviors associated with information technology enabled work systems. MIS Quart. 29(3):525–557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim SS, Malhotra NK (2005) A longitudinal model of continued IS use: An integrative view of four mechanisms underlying postadoption phenomena. Management Sci. 51(5):741–755.Link, Google Scholar
• Koh SL, Demirbag M, Bayraktar E, Tatoglu E, Zaim S (2007) The impact of supply chain management practices on performance of SMEs. Indust. Management Data Systems 107(1):103–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kwahk KY, Lee JN (2008) The role of readiness for change in ERP implementation: Theoretical bases and empirical validation. Inform. Management 45(7):474–481.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis W, Agarwal R, Sambamurthy V (2003) Sources of influence on beliefs about information technology use: An empirical study of knowledge workers. MIS Quart. 27(4):657–678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang H, Saraf N, Hu Q, Xue Y (2007) Assimilation of enterprise systems: The effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. MIS Quart. 31(1):59–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liao H, Chuang A (2004) A multilevel investigation of factors influencing employee service performance and customer outcomes. Acad. Management J. 47(1):41–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin CS, Wu S, Tsai RJ (2005) Integrating perceived playfulness into expectation-confirmation model for Web portal context. Inform. Management 42(5):683–693.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lohmoller JB (1988) The PLS program system: Latent variables path analysis with partial least squares estimation. Multivariate Behav. Res. 23(1):125–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu J, Yu CS, Liu C, Yao JE (2003) Technology acceptance model for wireless Internet. Internet Res. 13(3):206–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marcoulides GA, Saunders C (2006) PLS: A silver bullet? MIS Quart. 30(2):iii–ix.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathieson K (1991) Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Inform. Systems Res. 2(3):173–191.Link, Google Scholar
• Monczka R, Trent R, Handfeld R (2002) Purchasing and Supply Chain Management (South-Western, Cincinnati, OH).Google Scholar
• Moon JW, Kim YG (2001) Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Inform. Management 38(4):217–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neufeld DJ, Dong L, Higgins C (2007) Charismatic leadership and user acceptance of information technology. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 16(4):494–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pavlou PA (2003) Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce 7(3):101–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petter S, Straub D, Rai A (2007) Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Quart. 31(4):623–656.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 88(5):879–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2004) SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav. Res. Methods, Instruments, Comput. 36(4):717–731.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav. Res. Methods 40(3):879–891.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Premkumar G, Bhattacherjee A (2008) Explaining information technology usage: A test of competing models. Omega 36(1):64–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Premkumar G, Roberts M (1999) Adoption of new information technologies in rural small businesses. Omega 27(4):467–484.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rai A, Patnayakuni R (1996) A structural model for CASE adoption behavior. J. Management Inform. Systems 13(2):205–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rajagopal P (2002) An innovation—Diffusion view of implementation of enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems and development of a research model. Inform. Management 40(2):87–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ralph W (1991) Help! The Art of Computer Technical Support (Peachpit Press, Berkeley, CA).Google Scholar
• Ramkumar M, Jenamani M (2012) E-procurement service provider selection-an analytic network process-based group decision-making approach. Service Sci. 4(3):269–294.Link, Google Scholar
• Ramkumar M, Jenamani M (2015) Sustainability in Supply Chain Through E-Procurement—An Assessment Framework Based on DANP and Liberatore Score. IEEE Systems J. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Ringle CM, Wende S, Becker J-M (2014) Smartpls 3.0. (SmartPLS, Hamburg). Accessed September 26, 2014, http://www.smartpls.com.Google Scholar
• Rogers EM (1995) Diffusion of Innovations (Simon and Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Sabherwal R, Jeyaraj A, Chowa C (2006) Information system success: Individual and organizational determinants. Management Sci. 52(12):1849–1864.Link, Google Scholar
• Shibl R, Lawley M, Debuse J (2013) Factors influencing decision support system acceptance. Decision Support Systems 54(2):953–961.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staples DS, Seddon P (2004) Testing the technology-to-performance chain model. J. Organ. End User Comput. 16(4):17–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Straub D, Boudreau MC, Gefen D (2004) Validation guidelines for IS positivist research. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 13(1):380–427.Google Scholar
• Suh B, Han I (2003) Effect of trust on customer acceptance of Internet banking. Electronic Commerce Res. Appl. 1(3):247–263.Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Bhattacherjee A (2011) Multi-level analysis in information systems research: The case of enterprise resource planning system usage in China. Enterprise Inform. Systems 5(4):469–494.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor S, Todd PA (1995) Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Inform. Systems Res. 6(2):144–176.Link, Google Scholar
• Teo TS, Lin S, Lai KH (2009) Adopters and non-adopters of e-procurement in Singapore: An empirical study. Omega 37(5):972–987.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tornatzky LG, Klein K (1982) Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 29(1):28–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vaidyanathan G, Devaraj S (2008) The role of quality in e-procurement performance: An empirical analysis. J. Oper. Management 26(3):407–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V (2000) Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Inform. Systems Res. 11(4):342–365.Link, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Bala H (2008) Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sci. 39(2):273–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Davis FD (1996) A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sci. 27(3):451–481.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Bala H, Sykes TA (2010) Impacts of information and communication technology implementations on employees’ jobs in service organizations in India: A multi-method longitudinal field study. Production Oper. Management 19(5):591–613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wixom BH, Watson HJ (2001) An empirical investigation of the factors affecting data warehousing success. MIS Quart. 25(1):17–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yi MY, Davis FD (2001) Improving computer training effectiveness for decision technologies: Behavior modeling and retention enhancement. Decision Sci. 32(3):521–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yi MY, Hwang Y (2003) Predicting the use of Web-based information systems: Self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model. Internat. J. Human-Comput. Stud. 59(4):431–449.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zmud RW, Cox JF (1979) The implementation process: A change approach. MIS Quart. 3(2):35–43.Crossref, Google Scholar