Testing Service Innovation: A Methodological Review of Video Experiments

References

• Amanatullah ET, Tinsley CH (2013) Punishing female negotiators for asserting too much…or not enough: Exploring why advocacy moderates backlash against assertive female negotiators. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 120(1):110–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bateson JE, Hui MK (1992) The ecological validity of photographic slides and videotapes in simulating the service setting. J. Consumer Res. 19(2):271–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bitner MJ (1990) Evaluating service encounters: The effects of physical surroundings and employee responses. J. Marketing 54(2):69–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bitner MJ, Ostrom AL, Morgan FN (2008) Service blueprinting: A practical technique for service innovation. California Management Rev. 50(3):66–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boshoff C (2012) A neurophysiological assessment of consumers’ emotional responses to service recovery behaviors: The impact of ethnic group and gender similarity. J. Service Res. 15(4):401–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Botti S (2004) The psychological pleasure and pain of choosing: When people prefer choosing at the cost of subsequent outcome satisfaction. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 87(3):312–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowles HR, Babcock L, Lai L (2007) Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: Sometimes it does hurt to ask. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 103(1):84–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyer KK, Swink ML (2008) Empirical elephants—Why multiple methods are essential to quality research in operations and supply chain management. J. Oper. Management 26(3):338–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gosling SD (2011) Amazon’s Mechanical Turk a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 6(1):3–5.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chase RB, Apte UM (2007) A history of research in service operations: What’s the big idea? J. Oper Management 25(2):375–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chase RB, Dasu S (2001) Want to perfect your company’s service? Use behavioral science. Harvard Bus. Rev. 79(6):78–84.Google Scholar
• Cook LS, Bowen DE, Chase RB, Dasu S, Stewart DM, Tansik DA (2002) Human issues in service design. J. Oper. Management 20(2):159–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coulter KS, Coulter RA (2007) Distortion of price discount perceptions: The right digit effect. J. Consumer Res. 34(2):162–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cozby PC (2004) Methods in Behavioral Research, 8th ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Dabholkar PA (1996) Consumer evaluations of new technology-based self-service options: An investigation of alternative models of service quality. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 13(1):29–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dallimore KS, Sparks BA, Butcher KB (2007) The influence of angry customer outbursts on service providers’ facial displays and affective states. J. Service Res. 10(1):78–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dane E, Rockmann KW, Pratt MG (2012) When should I trust my gut? Linking domain expertise to intuitive decision-making effectiveness. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 119(2):187–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dasu S, Chase RB (2010) Designing the soft side of customer service. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 52(1):33–39.Google Scholar
• Dasu S, Chase RB (2013) The Customer Service Solution: Managing Emotions, Trust, and Control to Win Your Customer’s Business (McGraw Hill Professional, New York).Google Scholar
• Dirks KT, Kim PH, Ferrin DL, Cooper CD (2011) Understanding the effects of substantive responses on trust following a transgression. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 114(2):87–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dixon MJ, Victorino L, Kwortnik R, Verma R (2015) Surprise, anticipation, and sequence effects in service and experience design. Working paper, Ivey Business School, London, Ontario.Google Scholar
• Du J, Fan X, Feng T (2014) Emotional contagion and complaint intentions in group service failure: The role of group size and group familiarity. J. Service Res. 17(3):326–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edvardsson B (2009) Editorial. J. Service Management 20(1):4.Google Scholar
• Edvardsson B, Enquist B, Johnston R (2005) Cocreating customer value through hyperreality in the prepurchase service experience. J. Service Res. 8(2):149–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fessel F, Epstude K, Roese NJ (2009) Hindsight bias redefined: It’s about time. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 110(1):56–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiedler K, Wöllert F, Tauber B, Hess P (2013) Applying sampling theories to attitude learning in a virtual school class environment. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 122(2):222–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher RA (1926) The arrangement of field experiments. J. Ministry Agriculture Great Britain 33:503–513.Google Scholar
• Fredrickson JW (1986) Research notes and communications: An exploratory approach to measuring perceptions of strategic decision process constructs summary. Strategic Management J. 7(5):473–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gino F, Pisano G (2008) Toward a theory of behavioral operations. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(4):676–691.Link, Google Scholar
• Gino F, Argote L, Miron-Spektor E, Todorova G (2010) First, get your feet wet: The effects of learning from direct and indirect experience on team creativity. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 111(2):102–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grandey AA, Fisk GM, Mattila AS, Jansen KJ, Sideman LA (2005) Is “service with a smile” enough? Authenticity of positive displays during service encounters. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 96(1):38–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant AM, Hofmann DA (2011) Outsourcing inspiration: The performance effects of ideological messages from leaders and beneficiaries. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 116(2):173–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris R, Harris K, Baron S (2003) Theatrical service experiences: Dramatic script development with employees. Internat. J. Service Indust. Management 14(2):184–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hesslow G (2002) Conscious thought as simulation of behaviour and perception. Trends Cognitive Sci. 6(6):242–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyengar SS, Lepper MR (2000) When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? J. Personality Soc. Psych. 79(6):995–1006.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang L, Hoegg J, Dahl D, Chattopadhyay A (2010) The persuasive role of incidental similarity on attitudes and purchase intentions in a sales context. J. Consumer Res. 36(5):778–791.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson JG, Raab M (2003) Take the first: Option-generation and resulting choices. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 91(2):215–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson SK, Sitzmann T, Nguyen AT (2014) Don’t hate me because I’m beautiful: Acknowledging appearance mitigates the “beauty is beastly” effect. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 125(2):184–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kardes FR, Fennis BM, Hirt ER, Tormala ZL, Bullington B (2007) The role of the need for cognitive closure in the effectiveness of the disrupt-then-reframe influence technique. J. Consumer Res. 34(3):377–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim PH, Cooper CD, Dirks KT, Ferrin DL (2013) Repairing trust with individuals vs. groups. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 120(1):1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim PH, Dirks KT, Cooper CD, Ferrin DL (2006) When more blame is better than less: The implications of internal vs. external attributions for the repair of trust after a competence- vs. integrity-based trust violation. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 99(1):49–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kinias Z, Kim HS, Hafenbrack AC, Lee JJ (2014) Standing out as a signal to selfishness: Culture and devaluation of non-normative characteristics. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 124(2):190–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kopelman S, Rosette AS, Thompson L (2006) The three faces of Eve: Strategic displays of positive, negative, and neutral emotions in negotiations. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 99(1):81–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuehl RO (2000) Design of Experiments: Statistical Principles of Research Design and Analysis (Duxbury/Thomson Learning, Pacific Grove, CA).Google Scholar
• Larson RC, Gomez Diaz M (2012) Nonfixed retirement age for university professors: Modeling its effects on new faculty hires. Service Sci. 4(1):69–78.Link, Google Scholar
• Loman LA, Larkin WE (1976) Rejection of the mentally ill: An experiment in labeling. Sociol. Quart. 17(4):555–560.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luong A (2005) Affective service display and customer mood. J. Service Res. 8(2):117–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maglio PP (2013) Editorial—Service Science 2.0. Service Sci. 5(2):85–85.Link, Google Scholar
• Maglio PP, Spohrer J (2008) Fundamentals of service science. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 36(1):18–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Makino Y, Furuta K, Kanno T, Yoshihara S, Mase T (2009) Interactive method for service design using computer simulation. Service Sci. 1(2):121–134.Link, Google Scholar
• Mattila AS, Wirtz J (2006) Arousal expectations and service evaluations. Internat. J. Service Indust. Management 17(3):229–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mattila AS, Grandey AA, Fisk GM (2003) The interplay of gender and affective tone in service encounter satisfaction. J. Service Res. 6(2):136–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McColl-Kennedy JR, Daus CS, Sparks BA (2003) The role of gender in reactions to service failure and recovery. J. Service Res. 6(1):66–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meiren T, Burger T (2010) Testing of service concepts. Service Industries J. 30(4):621–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Norton MI, Dunn EW, Carney DR, Ariely D (2012) The persuasive “power” of stigma. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 117(2):261–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ostrom AL, Parasuraman A, Bowen DE, Patrício L, Voss CA, Lemon K (2015) Service research priorities in a rapidly changing context. J. Service Res. 18(2):127–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ostrom AL, Bitner MJ, Brown SW, Burkhard KA, Goul M, Smith-Daniels V, Demirkan H, Rabinovich E (2010) Moving forward and making a difference: Research priorities for the science of service. J. Service Res. 13(1):4–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paolacci G, Chandler J, Ipeirotis P (2010) Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment Decision Making 5(5):411–419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porath C, Macinnis D, Folkes V (2010) Witnessing incivility among employees: Effects on consumer anger and negative inferences about companies. J. Consumer Res. 37(2):292–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Purkiss SLS, Perrewe PL, Gillespie TL, Mayes BT, Ferris GR (2006) Implicit sources of bias in employment interview judgments and decisions. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 101(2):152–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roch SG (2007) Why convene rater teams: An investigation of the benefits of anticipated discussion, consensus, and rater motivation. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 104(1):14–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothman NB (2011) Steering sheep: How expressed emotional ambivalence elicits dominance in interdependent decision making contexts. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 116(1):66–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Russell CA (2002) Investigating the effectiveness of product placements in television shows: The role of modality and plot connection congruence on brand memory and attitude. J. Consumer Res. 29(3):306–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rust RT (2004) A call for a wider range of service research. J. Service Res. 6(3):211–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rust RT (2008) SSME—Let’s not forget about customers and revenue. Hefley B, Murphy E, eds. Service Science, Management and Engineering Education for the 21st Century (Springer, New York), 31–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sampson SE (2012) Visualizing service operations. J. Service Res. 15(2):182–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schacter DL, Addis DR, Buckner RL (2008) Episodic simulation of future events. Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 1124(1):39–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schellekens GAC, Verlegh PWJ, Smidts A (2010) Language abstraction in word of mouth. J. Consumer Res. 37(2):207–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seawright KK, Sampson SE (2007) A video method for empirically studying wait-perception bias. J. Oper. Management 25(5):1055–1066.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT (2002) Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference (Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston).Google Scholar
• Shleifer A (2000) Inefficient Markets: An Introduction to Behavioral Finance (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shostack GL (1987) Service positioning through structural change. J. Marketing 51(1):34–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1956) Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psych. Rev. 63(2):129–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1957) Models of Man: Social and Rational; Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in Society Setting (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Sparks BA, Bradley GL, Callan VJ (1997) The impact of staff empowerment and communication style on customer evaluations: The special case of service failure. Psych. Marketing 14(5):475–493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Specht N, Fichtel S, Meyer A (2007) Perception and attribution of employees’ effort and abilities. Internat. J. Service Indust. Management 18(5):534–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stanicek Z, Winkler M (2010) Service systems through the prism of conceptual modeling. Service Sci. 2(1–2):112–125.Link, Google Scholar
• Stickdorn M, Schneider J (2012) This is Service Design Thinking: Basics, Tools, Cases, 1st ed. (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Tanner RJ, Ferraro R, Chartrand TL, Bettman JR, Van Baaren R (2008) Of chameleons and consumption: The impact of mimicry on choice and preferences. J. Consumer Res. 34(6):754–766.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomke S (2003) R&D comes to services: Bank of America’s pathbreaking experiments. Harvard Bus. Rev. 81(4):71–79.Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Unkelbach C, Ostheimer V, Fasold F, Memmert D (2012) A calibration explanation of serial position effects in evaluative judgments. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 119(1):103–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven N, Zeelenberg M, Pieters R (2011) The envy premium in product evaluation. J. Consumer Res. 37(6):984–998.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venus M, Stam D, van Knippenberg D (2013) Leader emotion as a catalyst of effective leader communication of visions, value-laden messages, and goals. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 122(1):53–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verma R, Goodale JC (1995) Statistical power in operations management research. J. Oper. Management 13(2):139–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verma R, Anderson C, Dixon M, Enz C, Thompson G, Victorino L (2008) Key elements in service innovation: Insights for the hospitality industry. Cornell Hospitality Roundtable Proc. 1(November):1–16.Google Scholar
• Victorino L, Verma R, Wardell DG (2013) Script usage in standardized and customized service encounters: Implications for perceived service quality. Production Oper. Management 22(3):518–534.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Victorino L, Verma R, Bonner BL, Wardell DG (2012) Can customers detect script usage in service encounters? An experimental video analysis. J. Service Res. 15(4):390–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vilnai-Yavetz I, Rafaeli A (2006) Aesthetics and professionalism of virtual servicescapes. J. Service Res. 8(3):245–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vohs KD, Faber RJ (2007) Spent resources: Self-regulatory resource availability affects impulse buying. J. Consumer Res. 33(4):537–547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walker HJ, Field HS, Giles WF, Bernerth JB, Short JC (2011) So what do you think of the organization? A contextual priming explanation for recruitment Web site characteristics as antecedents of job seekers’ organizational image perceptions. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 114(2):165–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wason KD, Polonsky MJ, Hyman MR (2002) Designing vignette studies in marketing. Australasian Marketing J. 10(3):41–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber J (1992) Scenarios in business ethics research: Review, critical assessment, and recommendations. Bus. Ethics Quart. 2(2):137–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wirtz J (2003) Halo in customer satisfaction measures: The role of purpose of rating, number of attributes and customer involvement. Internat. J. Service Industry Management 14(1):96–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wirtz J, Mattila AS, Tan RLP (2007) The role of arousal congruency in influencing consumers’ satisfaction evaluations and in-store behaviors. Internat. J. Service Indust. Management 18(1):6–24.Crossref, Google Scholar