An Empirical Analysis of Optimal Nonlinear Pricing in Business-to-Business Markets

References

• Anderson ET, Dana JD Jr (2009) When is price discrimination profitable? Management Sci. 55(6):980–989.Link, Google Scholar
• Armstrong M (1996) Multiproduct nonlinear pricing. Econometrica 64(1):51–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aryal G, Gabrielli MF (2020) An empirical analysis of competitive nonlinear pricing. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 68:102538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bodoh-Creed AL, Hickman BR, List JA, Muir I, Sun GK (2023) Stress testing structural models of unobserved heterogeneity: Robust inference on optimal nonlinear pricing. NBER Working Paper No. 31647, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Carroll G (2017) Robustness and separation in multidimensional screening. Econometrica 85(2):453–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan TY (2006) Estimating a continuous hedonic-choice model with an application to demand for soft drinks. RAND J. Econom. 37(2):466–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan T, Kadiyali V, Xiao P (2009) Structural models of pricing. Rao VR, ed. Handbook of Pricing Research in Marketing (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 108–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen P, Hahn R, Hall J, Levitt S, Metcalfe R (2016) Using big data to estimate consumer surplus: The case of Uber. NBER Working Paper No. 22627, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Derdenger T, Kumar V (2013) The dynamic effects of bundling as a product strategy. Marketing Sci. 32(6):827–859.Link, Google Scholar
• Devanur NR, Haghpanah N, Psomas A (2020) Optimal multi-unit mechanisms with private demands. Games Econom. Behav. 121:482–505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Draganska M, Jain DC (2006) Consumer preferences and product-line pricing strategies: An empirical analysis. Marketing Sci. 25(2):164–174.Link, Google Scholar
• Dubé J-P (2004) Multiple discreteness and product differentiation: Demand for carbonated soft drinks. Marketing Sci. 23(1):66–81.Link, Google Scholar
• Dubé J-P, Misra S (2023) Personalized pricing and consumer welfare. J. Political Econom. 131(1):131–189.Google Scholar
• Gentry M, Li T (2014) Identification in auctions with selective entry. Econometrica 82(1):315–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghili S (2023) A characterization for optimal bundling of products with nonadditive values. Amer. Econom. Rev. Insights 5(3):311–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghili S, Schmitt M (2024) Risk aversion and double marginalization. J. Indust. Econom. 72(2):762–806.Google Scholar
• Haghpanah N, Hartline J (2021) When is pure bundling optimal? Rev. Econom. Stud. 88(3):1127–1156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendel I (1999) Estimating multiple-discrete choice models: An application to computerization returns. Rev. Econom. Stud. 66(2):423–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendel I, Nevo A (2013) Intertemporal price discrimination in storable goods markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(7):2722–2751.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howell JR, Lee S, Allenby GM (2016) Price promotions in choice models. Marketing Sci. 35(2):319–334.Link, Google Scholar
• Iyengar R, Gupta S (2009) Nonlinear pricing. Rao VR, ed. Handbook of Pricing Research in Marketing (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 355–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyengar R, Jedidi K (2012) A conjoint model of quantity discounts. Marketing Sci. 31(2):334–350.Link, Google Scholar
• Iyengar R, Jedidi K, Kohli R (2008) A conjoint approach to multipart pricing. J. Marketing Res. 45(2):195–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyer G, Villas-Boas JM (2003) A bargaining theory of distribution channels. J. Marketing Res. 40(1):80–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jeuland AP, Shugan SM (1983) Managing channel profits. Marketing Sci. 2(3):239–272.Link, Google Scholar
• Kadiyali V, Vilcassim NJ, Chintagunta PK (1996) Empirical analysis of competitive product line pricing decisions: Lead, follow, or move together? J. Bus. 69(4):459–487.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim J, Allenby GM, Rossi PE (2002) Modeling consumer demand for variety. Marketing Sci. 21(3):229–250.Link, Google Scholar
• Laffont J-J, Maskin E, Rochet J-C (1987) Optimal nonlinear pricing with two-dimensional characteristics. Groves T, Radner R, Reiter S, eds. Information, Incentives and Economic Mechanisms: Essays in Honor of Leonid Hurwicz (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis), 256–266.Google Scholar
• Lambrecht A, Seim K, Vilcassim N, Cheema A, Chen Y, Crawford GS, Hosanagar K, et al. (2012) Price discrimination in service industries. Marketing Lett. 23(2):423–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leslie P (2004) Price discrimination in Broadway theater. RAND J. Econom. 35(3):520–541.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin D, Smith JL (1994) Equilibrium in auctions with entry. Amer. Econom. Rev. 84(3):585–599.Google Scholar
• Liu YM, Brazell JD, Allenby GM (2022) Non-linear pricing effects in conjoint analysis. Quant. Marketing Econom. 20(4):397–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luo Y, Perrigne I, Vuong Q (2018) Structural analysis of nonlinear pricing. J. Political Econom. 126(6):2523–2568.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maskin E, Riley J (1984) Monopoly with incomplete information. RAND J. Econom. 15(2):171–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McManus B (2007) Nonlinear pricing in an oligopoly market: The case of specialty coffee. RAND J. Econom. 38(2):512–532.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mussa M, Rosen S (1978) Monopoly and product quality. J. Econom. Theory 18(2):301–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narayanan S, Chintagunta PK, Miravete EJ (2007) The role of self selection, usage uncertainty and learning in the demand for local telephone service. Quant. Marketing Econom. 5(1):1–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nevo A, Turner JL, Williams JW (2016) Usage-based pricing and demand for residential broadband. Econometrica 84(2):411–443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oi WY (1971) A Disneyland dilemma: Two-part tariffs for a Mickey Mouse monopoly. Quart. J. Econom. 85(1):77–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reiss PC, White MW (2005) Household electricity demand, revisited. Rev. Econom. Stud. 72(3):853–883.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rey P, Tirole J (1986) The logic of vertical restraints. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(5):921–939.Google Scholar
• Rey P, Vergé T (2008) Economics of vertical restraints. Buccirossi P, ed. Handbook of Antitrust Economics (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 353–390.Google Scholar
• Rochet J-C, Stole LA (2002) Nonlinear pricing with random participation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 69(1):277–311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rochet J-C, Stole LA (2003) The economics of multidimensional screening. Dewatripont M, Hansen LP, Turnovsky SJ, eds. Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications, Eighth World Congress, Econometric Society Monographs (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 150–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmalensee R (1981) Output and welfare implications of monopolistic third-degree price discrimination. Amer. Econom. Rev. 71(1):242–247.Google Scholar
• Song I, Chintagunta PK (2007) A discrete–continuous model for multicategory purchase behavior of households. J. Marketing Res. 44(4):595–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Varian HR (1985) Price discrimination and social welfare. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(4):870–875.Google Scholar
• Verboven F (2002) Quality-based price discrimination and tax incidence: Evidence from gasoline and diesel cars. RAND J. Econom. 33(2):275–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson RB (1993) Nonlinear Pricing (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang F (2025) Costly multidimensional screening. Rev. Econom. Stud., ePub ahead of print December 24, https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdaf105.Google Scholar