Centralized Pricing Versus Delegating Pricing to the Salesforce Under Information Asymmetry

References

• Basu Amiya K., Kalyanaram Gurumurthy. On the relative performance of linear versus nonlinear compensation plans. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1990) 7:171–178Crossref, Google Scholar
• Basu Amiya K., Kalyanaram Gurumurthy, Lal Rajiv, Srinivasan V., Staelin Richard. Salesforce compensation plans: An agency theoretic perspective. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4(4):267–291Link, Google Scholar
• Bergen Mark, Dutta Shantanu, Walker Orville C. Agency relationships in marketing: A review of the implications and applications of agency and related theories. J. Marketing (1992) 56:1–24Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhardwaj Pradeep. Delegating pricing decisions. Marketing Sci. (2001) 20(2):143–169Link, Google Scholar
• Chen Paul. Prices vs. quantities and delegating price authority to a monopolist. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1990) 57:521–529Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coughlan Anne T., Sen Subrata K. Salesforce compensation: Theory and managerial implications. Marketing Sci. (1989) 8(4):324–343Link, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg Drew, Tirole Jean. Game Theory (1993) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 267, 295–297Google Scholar
• Ghosh Mrinal, George John. Experimental evidence for agency models of salesforce compensation. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19(4):348–365Link, Google Scholar
• Gonik Jacob. Tie salesmen's bonuses to their forecasts. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1978) 56(3):116–124Google Scholar
• Harris M., Kreibel C., Raviv A. Asymmetric information, incentives, and intrafirm resource allocation. Management Sci. (1982) 28:604–620Link, Google Scholar
• Holmstrom Bengt. Moral hazard and observability. Bell J. Econom. (1979) 10(1):74–91Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmstrom Bengt, Milgrom Paul. Aggregation and linearity in the provision of intertemporal incentives. Econometrica (1987) 55(2):303–328Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joseph Kissan. On the optimality of delegating pricing authority to the sales force. J. Marketing (2001) 65(January):62–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalra Ajay, Shi Mengze. Designing optimal sales contests: A theoretical perspective. Marketing Sci. (2001) 20(2):170–193Link, Google Scholar
• Keenan William. Numbers racket. Sales Marketing Management (1995) 147(5):64–70Google Scholar
• Laffont Jean-Jacques, Tirole Jean. A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation (1998) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Lal Rajiv. Delegating pricing responsibility to the salesforce. Marketing Sci. (1986) 5(2):159–168Link, Google Scholar
• Lal Rajiv, Staelin Richard. Salesforce compensation plans in environments with asymmetric information. Marketing Sci. (1986) 5(Summer):179–198Link, Google Scholar
• Mantrala Murali K., Raman Kalyan. Analysis of a sales force incentive plan for accurate sales forecasting and performance. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1990) 7:189–202Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mantrala Murali K., Raman Kalyan, Sinha Prabhakant, Zoltners Andris A. Structuring a multiproduct sales quota-bonus plan for a heterogeneous sales force: A practical model-based approach. Marketing Sci. (1994) 13(2):121–144Link, Google Scholar
• Mas-Colell Andreu, Whinston Michael D., Green Jerry R.Microeconomic Theory (1995) (Oxford University Press, New York) 502–Google Scholar
• McAfee R. Preston, McMillan John. Multidimensional incentive compatibility and mechanism design. J. Econom. Theory (1988) 46:335–354Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mentzer John T., Cox James E. Familiarity, application and performance of sales forecasting techniques. J. Forecasting (1984) 3:27–36Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mishra Birendra K., Igor Vaysman. Cost system choice and incentives: Traditional versus activity-based costing. J. Accounting Res. (2001) 39(3):40–50Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moon Mark A., Mentzer John T. Improving salesforce forecasting. J. Bus. Forecasting Methods Systems (1999) 18:7–12Google Scholar
• Myerson Roger B. Incentive compatibility and the bargaining problem. Econometrica (1979) 47:1191–1220Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myerson Roger B. Optimal coordination mechanisms in generalized principal-agent problems. J. Math. Econom. (1982) 10:67–81Crossref, Google Scholar
• Noble Peter M., Gruca Thomas S. Industrial pricing: Theory and managerial practice. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(3):435–454Link, Google Scholar
• Rao Ram C. Compensating heterogeneous salesforces: Some explicit solutions. Marketing Sci. (1990) 9(4):319–341Link, Google Scholar
• Stephenson Ronald P., Cron William L., Frazier Gary L. Delegating pricing authority to the salesforce: The effects of sales and profit performance. J. Marketing (1979) 43(Spring):21–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stole Lars A.Lectures on the Theory of Contracts and Organizations (1995) (University of Chicago, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Tirole Jean. The Theory of Industrial Organization (1988) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Weinberg Charles B. An optimal commission plan for salesmen's control over price. Management Sci. (1975) 21(April):937–943Link, Google Scholar
• Wotruba Thomas R., Thurlow Michael L. Sales force participation in quota setting and sales forecasting. J. Marketing (1976) 40:11–16Crossref, Google Scholar