A Dynamic Changepoint Model for New Product Sales Forecasting

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1030.0046

References

  • Aaker David A. The new-trier stochastic model of brand choice. Management Sci. (1971) 17(April):B435–B450LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Alsem Karel J., Leeflang Peter S. H., Reuyl Jan C. The forecasting accuracy of market share models using predicted values of competitive marketing behavior. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1989) 6:183–198CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson Eric, Simester Duncan. Long-run effects of promotion depth on new versus established customers: Three field studies. Marketing Sci. (2003) 23(1):4–20LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Armstrong J. Scott. Evaluating forecasting methods. Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners (2001) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA) 443–472CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ayal Igal. Simple models for monitoring new product performance. Decision Sci. (1975) 6(April):221–236CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barry Daniel, Hartigan J. A. Product partition models for change point problems. Ann. Statist. (1992) 20(March):260–279CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barry Daniel, Hartigan J. A. A Bayesian analysis for change point problems. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1993) 88(March):309–319Google Scholar
  • Blattberg Robert, John Golanty. TRACKER: An early test-market forecasting and diagnostic model for new-product planning. J. Marketing Res. (1978) 15(May):192–202CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Böckenholt Ulf, Dillon William R. Some new method for an old problem: Modeling preference changes and competitive market structures in pretest market data. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 34(February):130–142CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Broadbent Simon. Modelling with adstock. J. Market Res. Soc. (1984) 26(4):295–312Google Scholar
  • Bronnenberg Bart J., Mela Carl F. Market roll-out and retail adoption for new brands. (2003) . Working paperGoogle Scholar
  • Bronnenberg Bart J., Mahajan Vijay, Vanhonacker Wilfried R. The emergence of market structure in new repeat-purchase categories: The interplay of market share and retailer distribution. J. Marketing Res. (2000) 37(February):16–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chatfield C., Goodhardt G. J. A consumer purchasing model with Erlang inter-purchase times. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1973) 68(December):828–835Google Scholar
  • Chatterjee Rabikar, Ramaswamy Venkatram. An extended mover-stayer model for diagnosing the dynamics of trial and repeat for a new brand. Appl. Stochastic Models Data Anal. (1996) 12(September):165–178CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chernoff H., Zacks S. Estimating the current measure of a normal distribution which is subject to changes in time. Ann. Math. Statist. (1964) 35(September):999–1018CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clarke Darral G., Searle & Co G. D. Equal low-calorie sweetener (B). (1984) (Harvard University, Cambridge, MA) . Harvard Business School Case 9-585-011Google Scholar
  • Danaher Peter J. Comparing naive with econometric market share models when competitors' actions are forecast. Internat. J. Forecasting (1994) 10:287–294CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • East Robert, Hammond Kathy. The erosion of repeat-purchase loyalty. Marketing Lett. (1996) 7(March):163–171CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ehrenberg A. S. C.Repeat Buying (1988) 2nd ed.(Charles Griffin, London, U.K.) Google Scholar
  • Elberse Anita, Eliashberg Jehoshua. Demand and supply dynamics for sequentially released products in international markets: The case of motion pictures. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(4):329–354LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eskin Gerald J. Dynamic forecasts of new product demand using a depth of repeat model. J. Marketing Res. (1973) 10(May):115–129CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fader Peter S., Hardie Bruce G. S. Forecasting repeat sales at CDNOW: A case study. Interfaces (2001) 31(May–June):S94–S107LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fader Peter S., Hardie Bruce G. S., Zeithammer Robert. Forecasting new product trial in a controlled test market environment. J. Forecasting. (2003) 22(August):391–410CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fourt Louis A., Woodlock Joseph W. Early prediction of market success for new grocery products. J. Marketing (1960) 25(October):31–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta Sunil. Stochastic models of interpurchase time with time-dependent covariates. J. Marketing Res. (1991) 28(February):1–15CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta Sunil, Morrison Donald G. Estimating heterogeneity in consumers' purchase rates. Marketing Sci. (1991) 10(3):264–269LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hardie Bruce G. S., Fader Peter S., Wisniewski Michael. An empirical comparison of new product trial forecasting models. J. Forecasting (1998) 17(June–July):209–229CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson R., Matthews J. N. S. An investigation of changepoints in the annual number of cases of haemolytic uraemic syndrome. Appl. Statist. (1993) 42(3):461–471CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herniter Jerome. A probabilistic market model of purchase timing and brand selection. Management Sci. (1971) 18(12):P102–P113LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Howard Ronald A. Dynamic inference. Oper. Res. (1965) 13(September–October):712–733LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jain Dipak C., Vilcassim Naufel J. Investigating household purchase timing decisions: A conditional hazard function approach. Marketing Sci. (1991) 10(1):1–23LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jain Dipak C., Vilcassim Naufel J. Estimating household purchase rates for consumer nondurable goods. Appl. Stochastic Models Data Anal. (1994) 10(March):15–26CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jeuland Abel P., Bass Frank M., Wright Gordon P. A multi-brand stochastic model compounding heterogeneous Erlang timing and multinomial choice processes. Oper. Res. (1980) 28(2):255–277LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kalwani Manohar, Silk Alvin J. Structure of repeat buying for new packaged goods. J. Marketing Res. (1980) 17(August):316–322CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lipstein Benjamin. Tests for test marketing. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1961) 39(March–April):74–77Google Scholar
  • MacDonald Ian L., Zucchini Walter. Hidden Markov and Other Models for Discrete-Valued Time Series (1997) (Chapman & Hall, London, U.K.) Google Scholar
  • Moe Wendy W., Fader Peter S. Capturing evolving visit behavior in clickstream data. J. Interactive Marketing (2003) 18(Winter):5–19Google Scholar
  • Morgan Fred W. Are early triers heavy users? J. Bus. (1979) 52(July):429–434CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morrison Donald G., Schmittlein David C. Generalizing the NBD model for customer purchases: What are the implications and is it worth the effort? J. Bus. Econom. Statist. (1988) 6(April):145–159Google Scholar
  • Parfitt J. H., Collins B. J. K. Use of consumer panels for brand-share prediction. J. Marketing Res. (1968) 5(May):131–145CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pievatolo Antonio, Rotondi Renata. Analysing the interevent time distribution to identify seismicity phases: A Bayesian nonparametric approach to the multiple-changepoint problem. Appl. Statist. (2000) 49(4):543–562Google Scholar
  • Poulsen Carsten Stig. Mixed Markov and latent Markov modelling applied to brand choice behaviour. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1990) 7(1):5–19CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pringle Lewis G., Dale Wilson R., Brody Edward I. NEWS: A decision-oriented model for new product analysis and forecasting. Marketing Sci. (1982) 1(1):1–29LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rangan V. Kasturi, Bell Marie. Nestlé refrigerated foods: Contadina pasta & pizza (A). Harvard Business School, Case 9-595-035 (1994) (Harvard University, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Sabavala Darius J., Morrison Donald G. A nonstationary model of binary choice applied to media exposure. Management Sci. (1981) 27(June):637–657LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schmittlein David C., Morrison Donald G., Colombo Richard. Counting your customers: Who they are and what will they do next? Management Sci. (1987) 33(January):1–24LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stephens D. A. Bayesian retrospective multiple-changepoint identification. Appl. Statist. (1994) 43(1):159–178CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor James W. A striking characteristic of innovators. J. Marketing Res. (1977) 14(February):104–107CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yao Yi-Ching. Estimation of a noisy discrete-time step function: Bayes and empirical Bayes approaches. Ann. Statist. (1984) 12(December):1434–1447CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.