Research Issues at the Boundary of Competitive Dynamics and Market Evolution

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1040.0065

References

  • Abernathy W., Utterback J. M. Patterns of industrial innovation. Tech. Rev. (1978) 80:41–47Google Scholar
  • Adams William, Encaoua David. Distorting the direction of technological change. Eur. Econom. Rev. (1994) 38:663–673CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arrow Kenneth J., Nelson R. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity (1962) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 609–626CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Athey S., Schmultzer A. Product and process flexibility in an innovative environment. RAND J. Econom. (1995) 26:557–574CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bain Joseph. A note on pricing in monopoly and oligopoly. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1949) 39:448–464Google Scholar
  • Bain Joseph. Barriers to Competition (1956) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Balasubramanian Sridhar, Peterson Robert A., Bronnenberg Bart J. Exploring the implications of the Internet for consumer marketing. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (1997) 25(4):329–346CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bergemann Dirk, Välimäki Juuso. Learning and strategic pricing. Econometrica (1996) 64(5):1125–1149CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bond Ronald S., Lean David F. Sales, promotion, and product differentiation in two prescription drug markets. Economic Report (1977) (Federal Trade Commission, Washington, D.C.) Google Scholar
  • Bowman Douglas, Gatignon Hubert. Determinants of competitor response time to a new product introduction. J. Marketing Res. (1995) 32(1):42–53CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bowman Douglas, Gatignon Hubert. The impact of competitive context on the allocation of marketing mix resources. (2000) . Working paper, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, FranceGoogle Scholar
  • Bronnenberg Bart J., Mahajan Vijay, Vanhonacker Wilfried R. The emergence of market structure in new repeat-purchase categories: The interplay of market-share and retailer distribution. J. Marketing Res. (2000) 37(1):16–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Calantone Roger J., Schatzel Kim E. Strategic foretelling: Communication-based antecedents of a firm's propensity to preannounce. J. Marketing (2000) 64(1):17–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carpenter Gregory S., Nakomoto Ken. Consumer preference formation and pioneering advantage. J. Marketing Res. (1989) 26(3):285–298CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Demsetz Harold. Barriers to entry. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1982) 72(1):47–57Google Scholar
  • Dixit A. A model of duopoly suggesting a theory of entry barriers. Bell J. Econom. (1979) 10:20–32CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dougherty Joseph J., Broderick Harold M. Wort production. The Practical Brewer (1977) (Master Brewers Association of Americas, Madison, WI) 62–98Google Scholar
  • Eliashberg Jehoshua, Robertson Thomas S. New product preannouncing behavior: A market signaling study. J. Marketing Res. (1988) 25(August):282–292CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Erickson Gary M., Montgomery David B., Montgomery David B., Wittink Dick. Measuring the time-varying response to market communications instruments. Proc. First Marketing Sci. Conf. (1980) (Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Eswaran Mukesh, Gallini Nancy. Patent policy and the direction of technological change. RAND J. Econom. (1996) 27(4):722–746CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Franses P. H. Modeling new product sales: An application of cointegration analysis. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1994) 11(Nov–Dec):491–502CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gatignon Hubert. Competition as a moderator of the effect of advertising on sales. J. Marketing Res. (1984) 21(4):387–398CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gatignon Hubert, Robertson Thomas S., Kassarjian Harold, Robertson Thomas S. Innovative decision processes. Handbook of Consumer Behavior Theory and Research (1991) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Gatignon Hubert, Soberman David, Weitz Barton, Wensley Robin. Competitive response and market evolution. Handbook of Marketing (2002) (Sage Publications, London, U.K.) 126–147CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gatignon Hubert, Anderson Erin, Helsen Kristiaan. Competitive reactions to market entry: Explaining interfirm differences. J. Marketing Res. (1989) 26(1):44–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gatignon Hubert, Robertson Thomas S., Fein Adam. Incumbent defence strategies against innovative entry. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1997) 14(2):163–176CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibbons Robert. Game Theory for Applied Economists (1992) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 210–218Google Scholar
  • Gilbert Richard, Newbery David. Preemptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1982) 72(June):514–526Google Scholar
  • Heil Oliver P., Langvardt Arlen W. The interface between competitive market signaling and antitrust law. J. Marketing (1994) 58(July):81–96CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iyer G., Pazgal A. Internet shopping agents: Virtual co-location and competition. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(1):85–106LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jacquemin Alexis, Slade Margaret E., Schmalensee Richard, Willig Robert. Cartels, collusion, and horizontal merger. Handbook of Industrial Organization (1989) (North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 416–473CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kardes Frank R., Kalyanaram Gurumurthy. Order-of-entry effects on consumer memory and judgment: An information integration perspective. J. Marketing Res. (1992) 29(3):343–357CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kuester Sabine, Gatignon Hubert, Robertson Thomas S., Mahajan Vijay, Muller Eitan, Wind Yoram. Firm strategy and speed of diffusion. New-Product Diffusion Models (2000) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Kuester Sabine, Homburg Christian, Robertson Thomas S. Retaliatory behavior to new product entry. J. Marketing (1999) 63(4):90–106CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lal Rajiv, Sarvary Miklos. When and how is the Internet likely to decrease price competition? Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(4):485–503LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lambkin Mary, Day George S. Evolutionary processes in competitive markets: Beyond the product life cycle. J. Marketing (1989) 53(3):4–20CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lane W. J. Product differentiation in market with sequential entry. Bell J. Econom. (1980) 11:237–259CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leeflang Peter S. H., Wittink Dick R. Diagnosing competitive reactions using (aggregated) scanner data. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1992) 9:39–57CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacDougall A. J. Rubber products industry. The 1998 Canadian Encyclopedia (1997) (McClelland & Stewart, Toronto, Ontario, Canada) Google Scholar
  • Mansfield Edwin. Technical change and the rate of imitation. Econometrica (1961) 29(4):741–765CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moore M. Signals and choices in competitive interactions: The role of moves and messages. Management Sci. (1992) 38(4):483–500LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ramaswamy Venkatram, Gatignon Hubert, Reibstein David J. Competitive marketing behavior in industrial markets. J. Marketing (1994) 58(April):45–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robertson Thomas S., Eliashberg J., Rymon T. New product announcement signals and incumbent reactions. J. Marketing (1995) 59(1):1–15CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robinson Bruce, Lakhani Chet. Dynamic models for new-product planning. Management Sci. (1975) 21(10):1113–1122LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Robinson William T. Marketing mix reactions to entry. Marketing Sci. (1988) 7(4):368–392LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rogers E. M.Diffusion of Innovations (1983) 3rd ed.(The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Shankar Venkatesh. Pioneers' marketing mix reactions to entry in different competitive game structures: Theoretical analysis and empirical illustration. Marketing Sci. (1997) 16(3):271–293LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shankar Venkatesh. New product introduction and incumbent response strategies: Their interrelationship and the role of multimarket contact. J. Marketing Res. (1999) 36(3):327–344CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spence Michael. Market Signaling (1974) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Spence Michael. Entry, capacity, investment and oligopolistic pricing. Bell J. Econom. (1977) 8:534–544CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.