Reasoning About Competitive Reactions: Evidence from Executives
Published Online:1 Feb 2005https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1040.0076
References
- . Enhancing new product development performance: An organizational learning perspective. J. Product Innovation Management (1998) 15:403–422Crossref, Google Scholar
- Market response to a major policy change in the marketing mix: Learning from Procter and Gamble's value pricing strategy. J. Marketing (2001) 65(January):44–61Crossref, Google Scholar
- . Marketing success can breed “Marketing inertia.”. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1981) 59(September/October):115–121Google Scholar
- . Determinants of competitor response time to a new product introduction. J. Marketing Res. (1995) 32(February):42–53Crossref, Google Scholar
- Hindsight bias and strategic choice: Some problems in learning from experience. Acad. Management J. (1988) 31(3):628–641Crossref, Google Scholar
- Action characteristics as predictors of competitive responses. Management Sci. (1992) 38(March):439–455Link, Google Scholar
- Perceiving competitive reactions: The value of accuracy (and paranoia). Marketing Lett. (1996) 7(2):115–129Crossref, Google Scholar
- Environmental scanning: The effects of task complexity and source accessibility on information gathering behavior. Decision Sci. (1983) 14:194–206Crossref, Google Scholar
- A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1992) 2nd ed.(Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, U.K.) Google Scholar
- Learning about markets. (1991) . Marketing Science Institute Report No. 91-117, Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- , Day George S., Reibstein David J. Introduction: The dynamic challenges for theory and practice. Wharton on Dynamic Competitive Strategy (1997) (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York) 1–18Google Scholar
- . Assessing advantage: A framework for diagnosing competitive superiority. J. Marketing (1988) 52(April):1–20Crossref, Google Scholar
- Competitive reactions: Intensity and effectiveness. (2001) Presented at the MSI Conference on Competitive ResponsivenessMay 17–18Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- . Competitive analysis. Marketing Lett. (1994) 5(3):271–288Crossref, Google Scholar
- Retailer reactions to a competitor's price change. J. Retailing (1994) 70(Spring):1–22Crossref, Google Scholar
- . Thinking Strategically (1991) (W. W. Norton, New York) Google Scholar
- Ambiguity and uncertainty in probabilistic inference. Psych. Rev. (1985) 92(4):433–461Crossref, Google Scholar
- , Day George S., Reibstein David J. Creative strategies for responding to competitive actions. Wharton on Dynamic Competitive Strategy (1997) (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York) 237–255Google Scholar
- . Only the Paranoid Survive: How to Exploit the Crisis Points That Challenge Every Company (1999) (Doubleday, New York) Google Scholar
- Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Sci. (1991) 2(February):88–115Crossref, Google Scholar
- Dynamic decision making: Optimal policies and actual behavior in sequential choice problems. Marketing Lett. (1994) 5(4):369–382Crossref, Google Scholar
- . Competitive intelligence: Creating value for the organization. (1993) (Society for Competitive Intelligence Professionals, Alexandria, VA) Google Scholar
- . Improving the external validity of marketing models: A plea for more qualitative input. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2000) 17:177–182Crossref, Google Scholar
- . Competitive reaction versus consumer response: Do managers overreact?”. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1996) 13:103–119Crossref, Google Scholar
- . Diagnosing competitive reactions using (aggregated) scanner data. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1992) 9:39–57Crossref, Google Scholar
- , Day George S., Reibstein David J. Behavioral theory and naive strategic reasoning. Wharton on Dynamic Competitive Strategy (1997) (John Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
- Blinders, fuzzy lenses, and the wrong shoes: Pitfalls in competitive conjecture. Marketing Lett. (1994) 5(3):247–258Crossref, Google Scholar
- Variations in use of decision makers' use of information sources: The impact of quality versus accessibility of information. Acad. Management J. (1982) 25:756–771Crossref, Google Scholar
- Reliability of nominal date based on qualitative judgments. J. Marketing Res. (1989) 26(May):135–148Crossref, Google Scholar
- . Competitive Strategy (1980) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
- Competitive marketing behavior in industrial markets. J. Marketing (1994) 58(April):45–55Crossref, Google Scholar
- , Day George S., Reibstein David J. Putting the lesson before the test: Using simulation to analyze and develop competitive strategies. Wharton on Dynamic Competitive Strategy (1997) (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York) 395–423Google Scholar
- Marketing mix reactions to entry. Marketing Sci. (1988) 7(Fall):368–385Link, Google Scholar
- Predictors of competitive strategic actions: Theory and preliminary evidence. J. Bus. Res. (1989) 18:245–258Crossref, Google Scholar
- Rational strategic reasoning: An unnatural act? Marketing Lett. (1998) 9(August):285–300Crossref, Google Scholar
- , Day George S., Reibstein David J. Anticipating reactions: Factors that shape competitor responses. Wharton on Dynamic Competitive Strategy (1997) (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York) Google Scholar
- Blind spots in industry and competitor analysis: Implications of interfirm (mis)perceptions for strategic decisions. Acad. Management Rev. (1991) 16:37–56Crossref, Google Scholar

