Research on Innovation: A Review and Agenda for Marketing Science

References

• Abernathy William J., Utterback J. M. Patterns of industrial innovation. Tech. Rev. (1978) 80(7):40–47Google Scholar
• Abernethy Jacob, Evgeniou Theodoros, Vert Jean-Philippe. An optimization framework for adaptive questionnaire design. (2004) . INSEAD, Fontainebleau, FranceGoogle Scholar
• Adams James L.Conceptual Blockbusting: A Guide to Better Ideas (1986) 1st ed.(Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Adner Ron. When are technologies disruptive: A demand-based view of the emergence of competition. Strategic Management J. (2002) 23:667–688Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adner Ron, Levinthal Daniel. Demand heterogeneity and technology evolution: Implications for product and process innovation. Management Sci. (2001) 47(5):611–628Link, Google Scholar
• Agarwal Rajshree, Bayus Barry. The market evolution and sales takeoff of product innovations. Management Sci. (2002) 48(8):1024–1052Link, Google Scholar
• Ali A. Pioneering versus incremental innovation: Review and research propositions. J. Product Innovation Management (1994) 11(January):46–56Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen Thomas J.Managing the Flow of Technology (1986) (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Altschuler Genrich. Creativity As an Exact Science (1985) (Gordon and Breach, New York) Google Scholar
• Altschuler Genrich. And Suddenly the Inventor Appeared (1996) (Technical Innovation Center, Worcester, MA) Google Scholar
• Ancona Deborah Gladstein. Outward bound: Strategies for team survival in an organization. Acad. Management J. (1990) 33(2):334–351Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson Eugene W., Fornell Claes, Lehmann Donald R. Customer satisfaction, market share, and profitability: Findings from Sweden. J. Marketing (1994) 58(July):53–66Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arthur Brian. Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Econom. J. (1989) 99(March):116–131Google Scholar
• Baker G., Gibbons R., Murphy K. J. Informal authority in organizations. J. Law Econom. Organ. (1999) 15(March):56–72Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barabba Vincent P.Surviving Transformation: Lessons From GM’s Surprising Turnaround (2004) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Bass Frank M. A new product growth model for consumer durables. Management Sci. (1969) 15(1):215–227Link, Google Scholar
• Bass Frank M. Diffusion theory in marketing: A historical perspective. (2004) . Presented to the AMA-Sheth Doctoral Consortium, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, JuneGoogle Scholar
• Bass Portia I., Bass Frank M. The embedded model of the Norton-Bass successive technology generations model. (2004) . Working paper, University of Texas, Dallas, Dallas, TXGoogle Scholar
• Basu Amiya, Mazumdar Tridib, Raj S. P. Indirect network externality effects on product attributes. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(2):209–221Link, Google Scholar
• Baumgartner Hans, Steenkamp Jan-Benedict E. M. Exploratory consumer buying behavior: Conceptualization and measurement. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1996) 13(2):121–137Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bayus Barry L. Forecasting sales of new contingent products: An application to the compact disc market. J. Product Innovation Management (1987) 4(December):243–255Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bayus Barry L., Jain Sanjay, Rao Ambar G. Too little, too early: Introduction timing and new product performance in the personal digital assistant industry. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 34(February):50–63Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bayus Barry L., Jain Sanjay, Rao Ambar G. Truth or consequences: An analysis of vaporware and new product announcements. J. Marketing Res. (2001) 38(February):3–11Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bettman James R., Luce Mary Frances, Payne John W. Constructive consumer choice processes. J. Consumer Res. (1998) 25(3):187–217Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau Gary E., Pekny Joseph F., Varma Vishal A., Bunch Paul. Managing a portfolio of interdependent new product candidates in the pharmaceutical industry. J. Product Innovation Management (2004) 21(July):227–245Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boehm Barry. A spiral model of software development and enhancement. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engrg. Notes (1986) 11(4):14–24Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordley Robert. Determining the appropriate depth and breadth of a firm’s product portfolio. J. Marketing Res. (2003) 40(4):39–53Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boulding William, Christen Markus. Sustainable pioneering advantage? Profit implications of market entry order. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(3):371–392Link, Google Scholar
• Boulding William, Morgan Ruskin, Staelin Richard. Pulling the plug to stop the new product drain. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 34(February):164–176Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bower Joseph L., Christensen Clayton M. Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1995) 73(1):43–53Google Scholar
• Bowman Douglas, Gatignon Hubert. Order of entry as a moderator of the effect of the marketing mix on market share. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15(3):222–242Link, Google Scholar
• Bresnahan Timothy, Stern Scott, Trajtenberg Manuel. Market segmentation and the sources of rents from innovation: Personal computers in the late 1980s. RAND J. Econom. (1997) 28:S17Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bröder Arndt. Assessing the empirical validity of the “take the best” heuristic as a model of human probabilistic inference. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learning, Memory Cognition (2000) 26(5):1332–1346Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bronnenberg Bart J., Mela Carl F. Market roll-out and retailer adoption for new brands. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):500–518Link, Google Scholar
• Brown Shona L., Eisenhardt Kathleen M. Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(2):343–361Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burns Tom, Stalker G. M.The Management of Innovation (1961) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Campbell Robert. Fisherman’s Guide: A Systems Approach to Creativity and Organization (1985) (New Science Library, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Carlile Paul R. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(4):442–455Link, Google Scholar
• Carlile Paul R. Transferring, translating and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(5):555–569Link, Google Scholar
• Carpenter Gregory S., Nakamoto Kent. Consumer preference formation and pioneering advantage. J. Marketing Res. (1989) 26(August):285–298Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandrasekaran Deepa, Tellis Gerard J., Malhotra Naresh. New product growth models in marketing: A critical review of models and findings. Review of Marketing (2006) 3Google Scholar
• Chandy Rajesh K., Tellis Gerard J. Organizing for radical product innovation: The overlooked role of willingness to cannibalize. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35(November):474–487Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandy Rajesh K., Tellis Gerard J. The incumbent’s cures? Incumbency, size, and radical product innovation. J. Marketing (2000) 64(3):1–17Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandy Rajesh K., Prabhu Jaideep C., Antia Kersi D. What will the future bring? Dominance, technology expectations, and radical innovation. J. Marketing (2003) 67(3):1–24Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen Clayton. The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (1998) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Church Jeffrey, Gandal Neil. Network effects, software provision, and standardization. J. Indust. Econom. (1992) 60(March):85–104Crossref, Google Scholar
• Church Jeffrey, Gandal Neil. Complementary network externalities and technological adoption. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (1993) 11(2):239–260Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark Kim, Fujimoto Takahiro. New Product Performance (1991) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Claycamp Henry, Liddy L. E. Prediction of new product performance: An analytical approach. J. Marketing Res. (1969) 6(3, November):414–420Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cockburn Iain M., Henderson Rebecca M., Stern Scott. Untangling the origins of competitive advantage. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(October/November):1123–1137Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper Robert G. Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products. Bus. Horizons (1990) 33(3):44–54Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper Robert G. Third-generation new product processes. J. Product Innovation Management (1994) 11):3–14Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper Robert G., Edgett Scott J., Kleinschmidt Elko J. Portfolio management in new product development: Lessons from the leaders—II. Res.-Tech. Management (1997) 40(6):43–52Google Scholar
• Cooper Robert G., Edgett Scott J., Kleinschmidt Elko J.Portfolio Management for New Products (1998) (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Cooper Robert G., Edgett Scott J., Kleinschmidt Elko J. New product portfolio management: Practices and performance. J. Product Innovation Management (1999) 16(September):333–351Crossref, Google Scholar
• Currim Imran S. Using segmentation approaches for better prediction and understanding from consumer mode choice models. J. Marketing Res. (1981) 18(August):301–309Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cusumano Michael A., Selby Richard W.Microsoft Secrets: How the World’s Most Powerful Software Company Creates Technology, Shapes Markets, and Manages People (1995) (Touchstone, New York) Google Scholar
• Cusumano Michael A., Yoffie David B.Competing on Internet Time: Lessons From Netscape and Its Battle with Microsoft (1998) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Dahan Ely, Hauser John R. The virtual customer. J. Product Innovation Management (2002) 19(September):332–354Crossref, Google Scholar
• Damanpour Fariborz. Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Acad. Management J. (1991) 34(September):555–590Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danneels Erwin. Disruptive technology reconsidered: A critique and research agenda. J. Product Innovation Management (2004) 21(4):246–258Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Bono Edward. Mind Power (1995) (Dorling Kindersley, New York) Google Scholar
• Debruyne Marion, Reibstein David J. Social contagion and income heterogeneity in new product diffusion: A meta-analytic test. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):1–12Google Scholar
• Ding Min, Eliashberg Jehoshua. Structuring the new product development pipeline. Management Sci. (2002) 48(3):343–363Link, Google Scholar
• Dolan Robert J., Matthews John M. Maximizing the utility of customer product testing: Beta test design and management. J. Product Innovation Management (1993) 10(4):318–330Crossref, Google Scholar
• Einhorn Hillel J. Use of nonlinear, non-compensatory models as a function of task and amount of information. Organ. Behavior Human Performance (1970) 6:1–27Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elberse Anita, Eliashberg Jehoshua. Demand and supply dynamics for sequentially released products in international markets: The case of motion pictures. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(Summer):329–342Link, Google Scholar
• Eliashberg Jehoshua, Shugan Steven M. Film critics: Influences or predictors? J. Marketing (1997) 61(April):68–78Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eppinger Steven D. Information-based product development. (1998) . Presented to the Research Advisory Committee of the Center for Innovation in Product Development, MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Eppinger Steven D., Whitney Daniel E., Smith Robert P., Gebala David A. A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development. Res. Engrg. Design (1994) 6(1):1–13Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ettlie J. E., Rubenstein A. H. Firm size and product innovation. J. Product Innovation Management (1987) 4(2):89–108Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ettlie J. E., Bridges W. P., O’Keefe R. D. Organization strategy and structural differences for radical versus incremental innovation. Management Sci. (1984) 30(6):682–695Link, Google Scholar
• Evgeniou Theodoros, Pontil Massimiliano. Optimization conjoint models for consumer heterogeneity. (2004) . Working paper, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, FranceGoogle Scholar
• Evgeniou Theodoros, Boussios Constantinos, Zacharia Giorgos. Generalized robust conjoint estimation. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(3):215–230Link, Google Scholar
• Farrell Joseph, Saloner Garth. Standardization, compatibility and innovation. RAND J. Econom. (1985) 16(Spring):70–83Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farrell Joseph, Saloner Garth. Installed base and compatibility: Innovation, product pronouncements and predation. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76(December):940–955Google Scholar
• Faulkner Terrence W. Applying “options thinking” to R&D valuation. Res. Tech. Management (1996) 39(3):50–56Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fine Charles. Clockspeed: Winning Industry Control in the Age of Temporary Advantage (1998) (Perseus Books, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Foster Richard. Innovation: The Attacker’s Advantage (1986) (Summit Books, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foster Joseph A., Golder Peter N., Tellis Gerard J. Predicting sales takeoff for Whirlpool’s new personal valet. Marketing Sci. (2004) 22(2):180–191Google Scholar
• Foxall Gordon R. Consumer innovativeness: Novelty-seeking, creativity, and cognitive style. Res. Consumer Behavior (1988) 3:79–113Google Scholar
• Foxall Gordon R. Cognitive styles of consumer initiators. Technovation (1995) 15(5):269–289Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foxall Gordon R., Goldsmith Ronald E. Personality and consumer research: Another look. J. Market Res. Soc. (1988) 30(April):111–125Google Scholar
• Galbraith J. K.American Capitalism (1952) (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Garber Tal, Goldenberg Jacob, Libai Barak, Muller Eitan. From density to destiny: Using spatial dimension of sales data for early prediction of new product success. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23:419–429Link, Google Scholar
• Garnsey Elizabeth, Wright Stephen M. Technical innovation and organizational opportunity. Internat. J. Tech. Management (1990) 5(3):267–281Google Scholar
• Gatignon Hubert, Robertson Thomas. A propositional inventory for new diffusion research. J. Consumer Res. (1985) 11(March):849–867Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gatignon Hubert, Robertson Thomas, Robertson Thomas S., Kassarjian Harold S. Innovative decision processes. Handbook of Consumer Behavior (1991) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) 316–348Google Scholar
• Gatignon Hubert, Eliashberg Jehoshua, Robertson Thomas S. Modeling multinational diffusion patterns: An efficient methodology. Marketing Sci. (1989) 8(3):231–247Link, Google Scholar
• Gensch Dennis H. A two-stage disaggregate attribute choice model. Marketing Sci. (1987) 6(3):223–231Link, Google Scholar
• Gensch Dennis H., Soofi Ehsan S. Information-theoretic estimation of individual consideration sets. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1995) 12(May):25–38Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibbons Robert, Kreps D., Wallis K. Incentives and careers in organizations. Advances in Economic Theory and Econometrics (1997) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 1–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer Gerd, Goldstein Daniel G. Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psych. Rev. (1996) 1003(4):650–669Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbride Timothy, Allenby Greg M. A choice model with conjunctive, disjunctive, and compensatory screening rules. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(3):391–406Link, Google Scholar
• Goldenberg Jacob, Lehmann Donald R., Mazursky David. The primacy of the idea itself as a predictor of new product success. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):69–84Link, Google Scholar
• Goldenberg Jacob, Libai Barak, Muller Eitan. Riding the saddle: How cross-market communications can create a major slump in sales. J. Marketing (2002) 66(April):1–16Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldenberg Jacob, Mazursky David, Solomon Sorin. Toward identifying the inventive templates of new products: A channeled ideation approach. J. Marketing Res. (1999a) 36(May):200–210Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldenberg Jacob, Mazursky David, Solomon Sorin. Templates of original innovation: Projecting original incremental innovations from intrinsic information. Tech. Forecasting Soc. Change (1999b) 61:1–12Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldenberg Jacob, Mazursky David, Solomon Sorin. Creative sparks. Science (1999c) 285(September 3):1495–1496Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golder Peter N., Tellis Gerard J. Pioneer advantage: Marketing logic or marketing legend? J. Marketing Res. (1993) 30(May):158–170Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golder Peter N., Tellis Gerard J. Will it ever fly? Modeling the takeoff of really new consumer durables. Marketing Sci. (1997) 16(3):256–270Link, Google Scholar
• Golder Peter N., Tellis Gerard J. Growing, growing, gone: Cascades, diffusion, and turning points in the product life cycle. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(2):207–220Link, Google Scholar
• Goldsmith Ronald E., Hofacker Charles F. Measuring consumer innovativeness. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (1991) 19(3):209–222Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldsmith Ronald E., Freiden Jon B., Eastman Jacqueline K. The generality/specificity issue in consumer innovativeness research. Technovation (1995) 15(10):601–613Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green Paul E., Krieger Abba. Recent contributions to optimal product positioning and buyer segmentation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1989a) 41(July):127–141Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green Paul E., Krieger Abba. A componential segmentation model with optimal product design features. Decision Sci. (1989b) 20(2):221–238Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green Paul E., Rao Vithala R.Applied Multidimensional Scaling (1972) (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York) Google Scholar
• Green Paul E., Srinivasan V. Conjoint analysis in marketing: New developments with implications for research and practice. J. Marketing (1990) 54(4):3–19Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green Paul E., Wind Jerry. New way to measure consumers’ judgments. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1975) 53(July–August):107–117Google Scholar
• Green Paul E., Krieger Abba, Wind Jerry, Wind Jerry, Green Paul E. Buyer choice simulators, optimizers, and dynamic models. Market Research and Modeling: Progress and Prospects, A Tribute to Paul E. Green (2003) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA) Google Scholar
• Griffin Abbie. Evaluating QFD’s use in U.S. firms as a process for developing products. J. Product Innovation Management (1992) 9(3):360–373Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffin Abbie. PDMA research on new product development practices: Updating trends and benchmarking best practices. J. Product Innovation Management (1997a) 14(6):429–458Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffin Abbie. Modeling and measuring product development cycle time. J. Engrg. Tech. Management (1997b) 14(1):1–24Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffin Abbie, Hauser John R. The voice of the customer. Marketing Sci. (1993) 12(1):1–27Link, Google Scholar
• Griffin Abbie, Hauser John R. Integrating mechanisms for marketing and R&D. J. Product Innovation Management (1996) 13(3):191–215Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffin Abbie, Page Albert L. An interim report on measuring product development success and failure. J. Product Innovation Management (1993) 10(5):291–308Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffin Abbie, Page Albert L. The PDMA success measurement project: Recommended measures for product development success and failure. J. Product Innovation Management (1996) 13(6):478–496Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griliches Zvi. Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. J. Econom. Literature (1990) 28(December):1661–1707Google Scholar
• Gupta Sachin, Jain Dipak C., Sawhney Mohanbir S. Modeling the evolution of markets with indirect network externalities: An application to digital television. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(3):396–416Link, Google Scholar
• Hage Jerald. Theories of Organizations (1980) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Hart Susan, Hultink Erik Jan, Tzokas Nikolaos, Commandeur Harry R. Industrial companies’ evaluation criteria in new product development gates. J. Product Innovation Management (2003) 20(January):22–36Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauser John R. Competitive price and positioning strategies. Marketing Sci. (1988) 7(1):76–91Link, Google Scholar
• Hauser John R. Research, development, and engineering metrics. Management Sci. (1998) 44(12):1670–1689Link, Google Scholar
• Hauser John R. Metrics thermostat. J. Product Innovation Management (2001) 18(May):134–153Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauser John R., Gaskin Steven P. Application of the “defender” consumer model. Marketing Sci. (1984) 3(4):327–351Link, Google Scholar
• Hauser John R., Koppelman Frank S. Alternative perceptual mapping techniques: Relative accuracy and usefulness. J. Marketing Res. (1979) 16(November):495–506Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauser John R., Shugan Steven M. Defensive marketing strategy. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(4):319–360Link, Google Scholar
• Hauser John R., Toubia Olivier. The impact of utility balance and endogeneity in conjoint analysis. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(3):498–507Link, Google Scholar
• Hauser John R., Wernerfelt Birger. Existence and uniqueness of price equilibria in defender. Marketing Sci. (1988) 7(1):92–93Link, Google Scholar
• Hauser John R., Wernerfelt Birger. An evaluation cost model of consideration sets. J. Consumer Res. (1990) 16(March):393–408Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauser John R., Wernerfelt Birger. Application predictive test and strategy implications of a dynamic model of consumer response. Marketing Sci. (1982a) 1(2):143–179Link, Google Scholar
• Hauser John R., Wernerfelt Birger. Dynamic analysis of consumer response to marketing strategies. Management Sci. (1982b) 28(5):455–486Link, Google Scholar
• Hauser John R., Zettelmeyer Florian. Metrics to evaluate R,D&E. Res. Tech. Management (1997) 40(4):32–38Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hellofs Linda, Jacobson Robert. Market share and consumers’ perceptions of quality: When can firms grow their way to higher versus lower quality? J. Marketing (1999) 63(January):16–25Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henard David H., Szymanski David M. Why some new products are more successful than others. J. Marketing Res. (2001) 38(3):362–375Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirschman Elizabeth C. Innovativeness, novelty seeking, and consumer creativity. J. Consumer Res. (1980) 7(3):283–295Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho Teck H., Savin Sergei, Terwiesch Christian. Managing demand and sales dynamics in constrained new product diffusion. Management Sci. (2002) 48(2):187–206Link, Google Scholar
• Horsky Dan, Simon Leonard S. Advertising and the diffusion of new products. Management Sci. (1983) 1:31–47Google Scholar
• Howe Roger J., Gaeddert Dee, Howe Maynard A.Quality on Trial: Bringing Bottom-Line Accountability to the Quality Effort (1995) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Hultink Erik Jan, Hart Susan J., Robben Henry S. J., Griffin Abbie. New consumer product launch: Strategies and performance. J. Strategic Marketing (2000) 7(September):153–174Google Scholar
• Im Subin, Bayus Barry L., Mason Charlotte H. An empirical study of innate consumer innovativeness, personal characteristics, and new product adoption behavior. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (2003) 31(1):61–73Crossref, Google Scholar
• J. D. Power and AssociatesNew Autoshopper.com Study (2002) (J. D. Power and Associates, Agoura Hills, CA) Google Scholar
• Jain Dipak, Rao Ram C. Effect of price on the demand for durables: Modeling, estimation, and findings. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. (1990) 8(April):163–170Google Scholar
• Jain Dipak, Mahajan Vijay, Muller Eitan. Innovation diffusion in the presence of supply restrictions. Marketing Sci. (1991) 10(1):83–90Link, Google Scholar
• Jamieson Linda F., Bass Frank M. Adjusting stated intention measures to predict trial purchase of new products: A comparison of models and methods. J. Marketing Res. (1989) 26(3):336–345Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jedidi Kamel, Kohli Rajeev. Probabilistic subset-conjunctive models for heterogeneous consumers. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(3):483–494Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jedidi Kamel, Kohli Rajeev, DeSarbo Wayne S. Consideration sets in conjoint analysis. J. Marketing Res. (1996) 33(3):364–372Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson Eric J., Meyer Robert J. Compensatory choice models of non-compensatory processes: The effect of varying context. J. Consumer Res. (1984) 11:528–541Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalish Shlomo. A new product adoption model with price, advertising, and uncertainty. Management Sci. (1985) 31(12):1569–1585Link, Google Scholar
• Kalish Shlomo, Lilien Gary L. A market entry timing model for new technologies. Management Sci. (1986) 32(4):194–205Link, Google Scholar
• Kalwani Manohar U., Silk Alvin J. On the reliability and predictive validity of purchase intention measures. Marketing Sci. (1982) 1(3):243–286Link, Google Scholar
• Kalyanaram Gurumurthy, Urban Glen L. Dynamic effects of the order of entry on market share, trial penetration, and repeat purchases for frequently purchased consumer goods. Marketing Sci. (1992) 11(3):235–350Link, Google Scholar
• Kalyanaram Gurumurthy, Robinson William T., Urban Glen L. Order of market entry: Established empirical generalizations, emerging empirical generalizations, and future research. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(3):G212–G221Link, Google Scholar
• Kaplan Robert S., Norton David P. The balanced scorecard—Measures that drive performance. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1992) 70(January/February):71–79Google Scholar
• Katz Michael L., Shapiro Carl. Network effects, competition, and compatibility. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1985) 75(June):425–440Google Scholar
• Katz Michael L., Shapiro Carl. Technology adoption in the presence of network effects. J. Political Econom. (1986) 94(4):822–841Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz Michael L., Shapiro Carl. Product introduction with network externalities. J. Indust. Econom. (1992) 60(March):55–83Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz Michael L., Shapiro Carl. Systems competition and network effects. J. Econom. Perspect. (1994) 8(Spring):93–115Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelly Tom, Littman Jonathan. The Art of Innovation: Lessons in Creativity from IDEO, America’s Leading Design Firm (2001) (Currency Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Kerin Roger A., Varadarajan Rajan, Peterson Robert A. First-mover advantage: A synthesis, conceptual framework, and research propositions. J. Marketing (1992) 56(4):33–52Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khurana Anil, Rosenthal Stephen R. Integrating the fuzzy front end of new product development. Sloan Management Rev. (1997) 38(2):103–120Google Scholar
• Kim Jongbae, Wilemon David. Strategic issues in managing innovation’s fuzzy front end. Eur. J. Innovation Management (2002) 5(1):27–39Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirton Michael. Adaptors and innovators—A description and measure. J. Appl. Psych. (1976) 61(5):622–635Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirton Michael. Adaptors and Innovators: Styles of Creativity and Problem-Solving (1989) (Routledge, London, UK) Google Scholar
• Klein K., Sorra J. The challenge of innovation implementation. Acad. Management Rev. (1996) 21(4):1055–1080Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koen Peter, Ajamian Greg, Burkart Rober, Clamen Allen. Providing clarity and a common language to the “fuzzy front end”. Res.-Tech. Management (2001) 44(2):46–55Google Scholar
• Kohli Rajeev, Krishnamurthi Ramesh, Jedidi Kemel. Subset-conjunctive rules for breast-cancer diagnosis. (2003) . Working paper, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Kohli Rajeev, Lehmann Donald, Pae Jae. Extent and impact of incubation time in new product diffusion. J. Product Innovation Management (1999) 16(March):134–145Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krugman Paul. Peddling Prosperity (1994) (Norton, New York) Google Scholar
• Larson Erik W., Gobeli David H. Organizing for product development projects. J. Product Innovation Management (1988) 5(September):180Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lauga Dominique, Ofek Elie. Product innovation in the face of marketing demand uncertainty. (2004) . Working paper, Harvard Business School, Harvard, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Lave J., Wenger S.Situated Learning (1990) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• Lawler E., Mohrman S. Quality circles: After the honeymoon. Organ. Dynam. (1987) 15(4):42–54Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lehmann Donald R., Weinberg Charles B. Sales through sequential distribution channels: An application to movies and videos. J. Marketing (2000) 64(3):13–33Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leifer Richard, McDermott Christopher M., O’Connor Gina Colarelli, Peters Lois S., Rice Mark, Veryzer Robert W.Radical Innovation: How Mature Companies Can Outsmart Upstarts (2000) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Lenk Peter J., Rao Ambar G. New model from old: Forecasting product adoption by hierarchical Bayes procedures. Marketing Sci. (1990) 9(1):42–53Link, Google Scholar
• Levin Richard C., Klevorick Alvin K., Nelson Richard R., Winter Sidney G. Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity (1987) 3:783–831Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lieberman Marvin B., Montgomery David B. First-mover advantages. Strategic Management J. (1988) 9(5):41–58Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liebowitz S. J., Margolis Stephen. Winners, Losers and Microsoft (1999) (The Independent Institute, Oakland, CA) Google Scholar
• Liechty John, Ramaswamy Venkatram, Cohen Steven. Choice-menus for mass customization: An experimental approach for analyzing customer demand with an application to a Web-based information service. J. Marketing Res. (2001) 38(May):183–196Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lilien Gary L., Rao Ambar G., Kalish Shlomo. Bayesian estimation and control of detailing effort in a repeat purchase diffusion environment. Management Sci. (1981) 27(5):493–506Link, Google Scholar
• Lilien Gary L., Morrison Pamela D., Searls Kathleen, Sonnack Mary, Von Hippel Eric. Performance assessment of the lead user idea-generation process for new product development. Management Sci. (2002) 48(8):1042–1059Link, Google Scholar
• Little John D. C. A model of adaptive control of promotional spending. Oper. Res. (1966) 14(November–December):1075–1098Link, Google Scholar
• Little John D. C. Models and managers: The concept of a decision calculus. Management Sci. (1970) 16(8):466–485Link, Google Scholar
• Little John D. C. Managerial models for practice: A commentary on ‘models and managers: the concept of a decision calculus’. Management Sci. (2004) 50(12, Suppl.):1854–1860Link, Google Scholar
• Mahajan Vijay, Wind Jerry. Innovation Diffusion Models of New Product Acceptance (1986) (Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Mahajan Vijay, Wind Jerry. New product forecasting models, directions for research and implementation. Internat. J. Forecasting (1988) 4(3):341–358Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahajan Vijay, Muller Eitan, Bass Frank M. New product diffusion models in marketing: A review and directions for future research. J. Marketing (1990) 54(January):1–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahajan Vijay, Muller Eitan, Bass Frank M. Diffusion of new products: Empirical generalizations and managerial uses. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(3):G79–G88Link, Google Scholar
• Mahajan Vijay, Muller Eitan, Srivastava Rajendra K. Determination of adopter categories by using innovation diffusion models. J. Marketing Res. (1990) 27(February):37–50Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahajan Vijay, Sharma Subhash, Wind Yoram. Parameter estimation in marketing models in the presence of influential response data: Robust regression and applications. J. Marketing Res. (1984) 21(August):268–277Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manning Kenneth C., Bearden William O., Madden Thomas J. Consumer innovativeness and the adoption process. J. Consumer Psych. (1995) 4(4):329–345Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markham Stephen K. Moving technologies from lab to market. Res.-Tech. Management (2002) 45(6):31–42Google Scholar
• Markham Stephen K., Aiman-Smith Lynda. Product champions: Truths, myths and management. Res. Tech. Management (2001) 44(May):44–50Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markham Stephen K., Griffin Abbie. The breakfast of champions: Associations between champions and product development environments, practices and performance. J. Product Innovation Management (1998) 15(5):436–454Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martignon Laura, Hoffrage Ulrich. Fast, frugal, and fit: Simple heuristics for paired comparisons. Theory Decision (2002) 52(1):29–71Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFadden Daniel L., Zarembka P. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Frontiers of Econometrics (1973) (Academic Press, New York) 105–142Google Scholar
• Menor Larry J., Tatkionda Mohan V., Sampson Scout E. New service development: Areas for exploitation and exploration. J. Oper. Management (2002) 20(2):135–157Crossref, Google Scholar
• Michalek Jeremy J., Feinberg Fred M., Papalambros Panos Y. Linking marketing and engineering product design decisions via analytical target cascading. J. Product Innovation Management (2005) 22(1):42–56Crossref, Google Scholar
• Michalek Jeremy J., Feinberg Fred M., Adiguzel Feray, Ebbes Peter, Papalambros Panos Y. Realizable product line design optimization: Coordinating marketing and engineering models via analytic target cascading. (2004) . Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
• Midgeley David F. A simple mathematical theory of innovative behavior. J. Consumer Res. (1976) 3(June):31–41Crossref, Google Scholar
• Midgeley David F., Dowling Grahame R. Innovativeness: The concept and its measurement. J. Consumer Res. (1978) 4(March):229–242Crossref, Google Scholar
• Midgeley David F., Dowling Grahame R. A longitudinal study of product form innovation: The interaction between predispositions and social messages. J. Consumer Res. (1993) 19(March):611–625Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell W., Singh K. Death of the lethargic: Effects of expansion into new technical subfields on performance in a firm’s base business. Organ. Sci. (1993) 4(2):152–180Link, Google Scholar
• Montoya-Weiss Mitzi, Calantone Roger. Determinants of new product performance: A review and meta-analysis. J. Product Innovation Management (1994) 11(September):397–417Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore G. A.Crossing the Chasm: Marketing and Selling High-Tech Goods to Mainstream Customers (1991) (Harper Business, New York) Google Scholar
• Moorman Christine, Miner Anne S. The convergence of planning and execution: Improvisation in new product development. J. Marketing (1998) 62(3):1–20Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moorman Christine, Rust Roland T. The role of marketing. J. Marketing (1999) 63(October Special Issue):180–197Special Millennium IssueCrossref, Google Scholar
• Morris Peter A., Teisberg Elizabeth Olmsted, Kolbe Lawrence. When choosing R&D projects, go with the long shots. Res. Tech. Management (1991) 34(1, January–February):35–40Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morrison Donald G. Purchase intentions and purchase behavior. J. Marketing (1979) 43(Spring):65–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nair Harikesh, Chintagunta Pradeep, Dube Jean-Pierre. Empirical analysis of indirect network effects in the market for personal digital assistants. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2004) 2(1):23–35Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narasimhan Chakravarthi, Sen Subrata K. New product models for test market data. J. Marketing (1983) 47(Winter):11–24Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narasimhan Chakravarthi, Zhang Z. John. Market entry strategy under firm heterogeneity and asymmetric payoffs. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19(4):313–325Link, Google Scholar
• Nault Barrie R., Vandenbosch Mark B. Eating your own lunch: Protection through preemption. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(3):342–358Link, Google Scholar
• Norton J., Bass F. M. A diffusion theory model of adoption and substitution for successive generations of high-technology products. Management Sci. (1987) 33(9):1069–1086Link, Google Scholar
• O’Connor Gina Colarelli, Veryzer Robert W. The nature of market visioning for technology-based radical innovation. J. Product Innovation Management (2001) 18(July):231–246Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Connor Gina Colarelli, Hendricks Richard, Rice Mark P. Assessing transition readiness for radical innovation. Res.-Tech. Management (2002) 45(6):50–56Google Scholar
• Ofek Elie, Sarvary Miklos. R&D, marketing, and the success of next-generation products. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(3):355–370Link, Google Scholar
• Ofek Elie, Turut Ozge. To innovate or imitate? R&D decision and the role of market research. (2004) . Working paper, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Orlikowski Wanda J. The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):398–427Link, Google Scholar
• Osborn A. J.Applied Imagination (1953) (Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Ozer Muanmmer. A survey of new product evaluation models. J. Product Innovation Management (1999) 16(January):77–94Crossref, Google Scholar
• Padmanabhan V., Rajiv Surendra, Srinivasan Kannan. New products, upgrades, and new releases: A rationale for sequential product introduction. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 34(November):456–472Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park C. Whan, Jun Sung Youl, MacInnis Deborah J. Choosing what I want versus rejecting what I do not want: An application of decision framing to product option choice decisions. J. Marketing Res. (2000) 37(May):187–202Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pavitt K. What we know about the strategic management of technology. California Management Rev. (1990) 32(Spring):17–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pauwels Koen, Srinivasan Shuba. Who benefits from store brand entry? Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(3):364–390Link, Google Scholar
• Payne John W., Bettman James R., Johnson Eric J.The Adaptive Decision Maker (1993) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peterson Robert A., Mahajan Vijay. Innovation diffusion in a dynamic potential adopter population. Management Sci. (1978) 24(15):1589–1597Link, Google Scholar
• Prince George M.The Practice of Creativity (1970) (Harper & Row Publishers, New York) Google Scholar
• Purohit Devavrat. What should you do when your competitors send in the clones? Marketing Sci. (1994) 13(4):392–411Link, Google Scholar
• Putsis William P., Balasubramaniam Sridhar, Kaplan Edward H., Sen Subrata. Mixing behavior in cross-country diffusion. Marketing Sci. (1997) 16(4):354–369Link, Google Scholar
• Raju P. S. Optimum stimulation level: Its relationship to personality, demographics and exploratory behavior. J. Consumer Res. (1980) 7(December):272–282Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao Akshay R., Mahi Humaira. The price of launching a new product: Empirical evidence on factors affecting the relative magnitude of slotting allowances. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(2):246–268Link, Google Scholar
• Repenning Nelson. Understanding fire fighting in new product development. J. Product Innovation Management (2001) 18(September):285–300Crossref, Google Scholar
• Repenning Nelson, Sterman John. Nobody ever gets credit for fixing defects that didn’t happen: Creating and sustaining process improvement. California Management Rev. (2001) 43(4):64–88Crossref, Google Scholar
• Repenning Nelson, Sterman John. Capability traps and self-confirming attribution errors in the dynamics of process improvement. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47(2):265–295Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ries Al, Trout Jack. The 22 Immutable Laws of Marketing (1993) (Harper Business, New York) Google Scholar
• Rindfleisch Aric, Moorman Christine. The acquisition and utilization of information in new product alliances: A strength-of-ties perspective. J. Marketing (2001) 65(2):1–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts John H., Lattin James M. Consideration: Review of research and prospects for future insights. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 34(August):406–410Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts John H., Morrison Pamela D., Nelson Charles J. Implementing a prelaunch diffusion model: Measurement and management challenges of the Telstra switching study. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(2):186–191Google Scholar
• Robinson William T. Sources of market pioneer advantages: The case of industrial goods industries. J. Marketing Res. (1988) 25(February):87–94Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson William T., Fornell Claes. Sources of market pioneer advantage in consumer goods industries. J. Marketing Res. (1985) 22(August):305–317Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roehrich Gilles. Consumer innovativeness: Concepts and measurements. J. Bus. Res. (2004) 57(June):671–695Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers Everett M.Diffusion of Innovations (2003) (Simon and Schuster, New York) Google Scholar
• Sahal Devendra. Alternative conceptions of technology. Res. Policy (1981) 10(1):2–24Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarin Shikhar, Shepherd Dean A. Boundary management by new product development teams: The effect on internal support and performance. (2004) . Presented to ISBM New Priorities and Challenges for Business-to-Business Marketers, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA, AugustGoogle Scholar
• Sawhney Mohanbir S., Eliashberg Jehoshua. A parsimonious model for forecasting gross box-office revenues of motion pictures. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15(2):113–131Link, Google Scholar
• Schmalensee Richard. Product differentiation advantages of pioneering brands. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1982) 72(June):349–365Google Scholar
• Schmalensee Richard, Thisse Jacques. Perceptual maps and the optimal location of new products: An integrative essay. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1988) 5(4):225–249Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmittlein David, Mahajan V. J. Maximum likelihood estimation for an innovation diffusion model of new product acceptance. Marketing Sci. (1982) 1(1):57–58Link, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J. A.Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (1942) (Harper, New York) Google Scholar
• Senin Nicola, Wallace David R., Borland Nicholas. Object-based simulation in a service marketplace. ASME J. Mech. Design (2003) 125(1):2–13Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shankar Venkatesh, Bayus Barry L. Network effects and competition: An empirical analysis of the home video game industry. Strategic Management J. (2001) 24(4):375–389Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shankar Venkatesh, Carpenter Gregory S., Krishnamurthi Lakshman. Late mover advantage: How innovative late entrants outsell pioneers. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35(February):54–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shocker Allan D., Hall William G. Pretest market models: A critical evaluation. J. Product Innovation Management (1986) 3(June):86–108Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonson Itamar. Get closer to your customers by understanding how they make choices. California Management Rev. (1993) 35(4):68–84Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonson Itamar, Staw Barry M. De-escalation strategies: A comparison of techniques for reducing commitment to losing courses of action. J. Appl. Psych. (1992) 77(4):419–426Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sinha Prabhakant, Zoltners Andris. Sales force decision models: Insights from 25 years of implementation. Interfaces (2001) 31(3, Part 2 of 2):S8–S44Link, Google Scholar
• Smith Preston G., Reinertsen Donald G. Shortening the product development cycle. Res.-Tech. Management (1992) 35(3):44–49Google Scholar
• Sood Ashish, Tellis Gerard J. Technological evolution and product innovation. J. Marketing (2005) 69(3):152–168Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorescu Alina B., Chandy Rajesh K., Prabhu Jaideep C. Sources and financial consequences of radical innovation: Insights from pharmaceuticals. J. Marketing (2003) 67(4):82–93Crossref, Google Scholar
• Souder William E.Managing New Product Innovations (1987) (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA) Google Scholar
• Srinivasan Raji, Lilien Gary L., Rangaswamy Arvind. First in, first out? The effects of network externalities on pioneer survival. J. Marketing (2004) 68(January):41–55Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srinivasan Raji, Lilien Gary L., Rangaswamy Arvind. The emergence of dominant designs. J. Marketing (2005) 70(2):1–17Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srinivasan V., Mason Charlotte H. Nonlinear least squares estimation of new product diffusion models. Marketing Sci. (1986) 5(2):169–178Link, Google Scholar
• Srinivasan V., Shocker Allen D. Estimating the weights for multiple attributes in a composite criterion using pairwise judgments. Psychometrika (1973) 38(December):473–493Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staw Barry M. Knee-deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organ. Behavior Human Performance (1976) 16(1):27–44Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steenkamp Jan-Benedict E. M., Gielens Katrijn. Consumer and market drivers of the trial probability of new consumer packaged goods. J. Consumer Res. (2003) 30(December):368–384Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steenkamp Jan-Benedict E. M., ter Hofstede Frenkel, Wedel Michel. A cross-national investigation into the individual and national cultural antecedents of consumer innovativeness. J. Marketing (1999) 63(April):55–69Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stremersch Stefan, Tellis Gerard J. Managing international growth of new products. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2004) 21(4):421–438Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sultan Fareena, Farley John U., Lehmann Donald R. A meta-analysis of applications of diffusion models. J. Marketing Res. (1990) 27(February):70–77Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun Baohong, Xie Jinhong, Cao H. Henry. Product strategy for innovators in markets with network effects. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(2):243–254Link, Google Scholar
• Swait Joffre. A non-compensatory choice model incorporating cutoffs. Transportation Res. (2001) 35(Part B):903–928Crossref, Google Scholar
• Takada Hirokazu, Jain Dipak C. Cross-national analysis of diffusion of consumer durable goods in Pacific rim countries. J. Marketing (1991) 55(April):48–54Crossref, Google Scholar
• Talukdar Debabrata, Sudhir K., Ainslie Andrew. Investigating new product diffusion across products and countries. Marketing Sci. (2002) 21(1):97–116Link, Google Scholar
• Teece David J. Capturing value from technological innovation: Integration, strategic partnering, and licensing decisions. Interfaces (1988) 18(3):46–61Link, Google Scholar
• Tellis Gerard J., Golder Peter N. First to market, first to fail? Real causes of enduring market leadership. Sloan Management Rev. (1996) 37(2):65–75Google Scholar
• Tellis Gerard J., Golder Peter N.Will and Vision: How Latecomers Grow to Dominate Markets (2001) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Tellis Gerard J., Stremersch Stefan, Yin Eden. The international takeoff of new products: Economics, culture, and country innovativeness. Marketing Sci. (2003) 20(2):188–208Link, Google Scholar
• Tellis Gerard J., Yin Eden, Bell Simon. Global consumer innovativeness: Country differences and individual commonalities. (2004) . Working paper, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
• Tellis Gerard J., Yin Eden, Niraj Rakesh. Network effects versus quality in the success of new high-tech products. (2005) . Working paper, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
• Thaler Richard. Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4(3):199–214Link, Google Scholar
• Thomke Stefan, von Hippel Eric. Customers as innovators: A new way to create value. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2002) 80(4):74–81Google Scholar
• Toubia Olivier. Idea generation, creativity, and incentives. Marketing Sci. (2006) . ForthcomingLink, Google Scholar
• Toubia Olivier, Hauser John R., Simester Duncan. Polyhedral methods for adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis. J. Marketing Res. (2004) 41(1):116–131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toubia Olivier, Simester Duncan I., Hauser John R., Dahan Ely. Fast polyhedral adaptive conjoint estimation. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(3):273–303Link, Google Scholar
• Tripsas Mary. Unraveling the process of creative destruction: Complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(Summer):119–142Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ulrich Karl. The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Res. Policy (1995) 24(3):419–440Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ulrich Karl, Eppinger Steven D.Product Design and Development (2000) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Urban Glen L., Hauser John R. “Listening in” to find and explore new combinations of customer needs. J. Marketing (2004) 68(April):72–85Crossref, Google Scholar
• Urban Glen L., Weinberg Bruce, Hauser John R. Remarket forecasting of really-new products. J. Marketing (1996) 60(January):47–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Urban Glen L., Carter Theresa, Gaskin Steven, Mucha Zofia. Market share rewards to pioneering brands: An empirical analysis and strategic implications. Management Sci. (1986) 32(June):645–659Link, Google Scholar
• Urban Glen L., Hauser John R., Qualls William J., Weinberg Bruce D., Bohlmann Jonathan D., Chicos Roberta A. Validation and lessons from the field: Applications of information acceleration. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 34(February):143–153Crossref, Google Scholar
• Utterback James M.Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation (1994) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte Christophe. New product diffusion acceleration: Measurement and analysis. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19(4):366–380Link, Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte Christophe, Lilien Gary L. Medical innovation revisited: Social contagion versus marketing effort. Amer. J. Sociology (2001) 106(March):1409–1435Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte Christophe, Stremersch Stefan. Social contagion and income heterogeneity in new product diffusion: A meta-analytic test. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):530–544Link, Google Scholar
• VanderWerf Pieter A., Mahon John F. Meta-analysis of the impact of research methods on findings of first-mover advantage. Management Sci. (1997) 43(11):1510–1519Link, Google Scholar
• Venkatesan Rajkumar, Trichy V. Krishnan, Kumar V. Evolutionary estimation of macro-level diffusion models using genetic algorithms: An alternative to nonlinear least squares. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(3):451–464Link, Google Scholar
• Venkatraman Meera P. The impact of innovativeness and innovation type on adoption. J. Retailing (1991) 67(1):51–67Google Scholar
• Veryzer Robert W. Discontinuous innovation and the new product development process. J. Product Innovation Management (1998) 15(July):304–321Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vincent Leslie H., Bharadwaj S. G., Challagalla G. N. Does innovation mediate firm performance? A meta-analysis of determinants and consequences of organizational innovation. (2004) . Working paper, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
• von Hippel Eric. Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Sci. (1986) 32(7):791–805Link, Google Scholar
• von Hippel Eric. The Sources of Innovation (1988) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• von Hippel Eric. User toolkits for innovation. J. Product Innovation Management (2001) 18(4):247–257Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wallace David, Abrahamson Shaun, Senin Nicola, Sferro Peter. Integrated design in a service marketplace. Comput.-Aided Design (2000) 32(2):97–107Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wenger Etienne. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity (1998) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wheelwright Steven C., Clark Kim B.Revolutionizing Product Development (1992) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Wierenga Berend, van Bruggen Gerrit. Marketing Management Support Systems: Principles, Tools and Implementation (2000) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu Jianan, Rangaswamy Arvind. A fuzzy set model of search and consideration with an application to an online market. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(3):411–434Link, Google Scholar
• Wuyts Stefan, Dutta Shantanu, Stremersch Stefan. Portfolios of inter-firm agreements in technology-intensive markets: Consequences for innovation and profitability. J. Marketing (2005) 68(2):88–100Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xie Jinhong, Sirbu Marvin. Price competition and compatibility in the presence of positive demand externalities. Management Sci. (1995) 41(May):909–926Link, Google Scholar
• Xie Jinhong, Song X. Michael, Sirbu Marvin, Wang Qiong. Kalman filter estimation of new product diffusion models. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 34(August):378–393Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yee Michael, Dahan Ely, Hauser John, Orlin James. Greedoid-based non-compensatory two-stage consideration-then-choice inference. Marketing Sci. (2006) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Zahay Debra, Griffin Abbie, Fredericks Elisa. Sources, uses and forms of data in the new product development process. Indust. Marketing Management (2004) 33(7):657–670Crossref, Google Scholar