Structural Modeling in Marketing: Review and Assessment

References

• Ackerberg D. Advertising, learning, and consumer choice in experience good markets: A structural empirical examination. Internat. Econom. Rev. (2003) 44:1007–1040Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allenby G., Rossi P. Marketing models of heterogeneity. J. Econometrics (1999) 89:57–78Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amman H., Rust J., Amman H., Kendrick D., Rust J. Numerical dynamic programming. Handbook of Computational Economics (1995) 1(North Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
• Anand B., Shachar R. Risk aversion and apparently persuasive advertising. (2002) . Working paper, Series 02-099, Harvard Business School, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
• Anderson E., Vilcassim N. J. Structural demand models for retail category pricing. (2001) . Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
• Bajari P., Benkard C. L. Discrete choice models as structural models of demand: Economic implications of common approaches. (2003) . Working paper, Department of Economics, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Bajari P., Benkard C. L., Levin J. Estimating dynamic models of imperfect competiton. (2004) . Working paper, Department of Economics, Duke University, Chapel Hill, NCGoogle Scholar
• Berry S. Estimating discrete-choice models of product differentiation. RAND J. Econom. (1994) 25(2):242–262Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry S., Levinsohn J., Pakes A. Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica (1995) 63:841–890Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besanko D., Dubé J., Gupta S. Competitive price discrimination strategies in a vertical channel using aggregate retail data. Management Sci. (2003) 49(9):1121–1138Link, Google Scholar
• Bound J., Jaeger D. A., Baker R. M. Problems with instrumental variables estimation when the correlation between the instrument and the endogeneous explanatory variable is weak. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1995) 90:443–450Google Scholar
• Bowden R. J., Turkington D. A.Instrumental Variables (1984) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Chiang J. A simultaneous approach to the whether, what, and how much to buy questions. Marketing Sci. (1991) 10(Fall):297–315Link, Google Scholar
• Ching A. Consumer learning and heterogeneity: Dynamics of demand for prescription drugs after patent expiration. (2002) . Working paper, Ohio State UniversityGoogle Scholar
• Chintagunta P. K. Investigating purchase incidence, brand choice and purchase quantity decisions of households. Marketing Sci. (1993) 2(Spring):184–208Link, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta P. K., Dubé J., Singh V. Balancing profitability and customer welfare in a supermarket chain. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2003) 1(1):111–147Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta P. K., Kadyali V., Vilcassim N., Moormans C., Lehmann D. Structural models of competition: A marketing strategy perspective. Assessing Marketing Startegy Performance (2004) (The Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Crawford G. S., Shum M. Uncertainty and learning in pharmaceutical demand: Anti-ulcer drugs. (2003) . Working paper, University of ArizonaGoogle Scholar
• Deaton A., Muelbauer J. An almost ideal demand system. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1980) 70(3):312–326Google Scholar
• Doraszelski U., Judd K. Avoiding the curse of dimensionality in dynamic stochastic games. (2004) . Working paper, Department of Economics, Harvard University, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
• Dubé J. Multiple discreteness and product differentiation: Demand for carbonated soft drinks. Marketing Sci. (2006) 23:66–81Link, Google Scholar
• Dubé J., Hitsch G., Manchanda P. An empirical model of advertising dynamics. (2006) . Working paper, The University of Chicago, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
• Dubé J., Chintagunta P., Petrin A., Bronnenberg B., Goettler R., Seetharaman P. B., Sudhir K., Thomadsen R., Zhao Y. Structural applications of the discrete choice model. Marketing Lett. (2002) 13(3):207Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ebbes P., Wedel M., Bockenholt U., Steerneman T. G. M. New evidence for the effect of education on income: Selling and testing for regressor error in dependence when no instrumental variables are available: With new evidence of the effect of education on income. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2005) 3:365–392Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckstein Z., Horsky D., Raban Y. An empirical dynamic model of brand choice. (1988) . Working Paper 88, University of RochesterGoogle Scholar
• El-Gamal M. A., Grether D. M. Are people Bayesian? Uncovering behavioral strategies. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1995) 90:1137–1145Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdem T. An empirical analysis of umbrella branding. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35(3):339–351Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdem T., Keane M. P. Decision-making under uncertainty: Capturing dynamic brand choice processes in turbulent consumer goods markets. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15:1–20Link, Google Scholar
• Erdem T., Imai S., Keane M. P. Brand and quantity choice dynamics under price uncertainty. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2003) 1:15–64Google Scholar
• Erdem T., Keane M., Strebel J. Learning about computers: An analysis of information search and technology choice. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2005) 3(3):207–247Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdem T., Srinivasan K., Amaldoss W., Bajari P., Che H., Ho T., Hutchinson W., Katz M., Keane M., Meyer B., Reiss P. Theory driven choice models. Marketing Lett. (2005) 16(3–6):225–237Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gasmi F., Laffont J., Vuong Q. Econometric analysis of collusive behavior in a soft-drink market. J. Econom. Management Strategy (1992) 1(2):277–311Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbride T., Allenby G. M. A choice model with conjunctive, disjunctive, and compensatory screening rules. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(3):391–406Link, Google Scholar
• Gönül F., Srinivasan K. Estimating the impact of consumer expectations of coupons on purchase behavior: A dynamic structural model. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15:262–279Link, Google Scholar
• Green E., Porter R. Noncooperative collusion under imperfect price information. Econometrica (1984) 52:87–100Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haavelmo T. The probability approach in econometrics. Econometrika Supplement (1944) 12:1–115Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hahn J., Hausman J. A new specification test for instrumental variables. Econometrica (2002) 70:163–189Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanemann W. M. Discrete continuous models of consumer demand. Econometrica (1984) 52:541–561Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman J., Rosen S. Heterogeneity and state dependence. Studies in Labor Markets (1981) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Hendel I., Nevo A. Measuring the implications of sales and consumer stockpiling behavior. (2002) . Working paper, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
• Hitsch G. An empirical model of optimal dynamic product launch and exit under demand uncertainty. (2004) . Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
• Hogan V., Rigobon R. Using unobserved supply shocks to estimate the returns to education. (2003) . NBER Working Paper 9145, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
• Horsky D., Nelson P. New brand positioning and pricing in an oligopolistic market. Marketing Sci. (1992) 11(2):133–153Link, Google Scholar
• Kadiyali V., Sudhir K., Rao V. R. Structural analysis of competitive behavior. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2000) 18(1–2):161–185Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kadiyali V., Vilcassim N., Chintagunta P. Empirical analysis of competitive product line pricing decisions: Lead, follow or move together? J. Bus. (1996) 9(4):459–487Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalyanaram G., Winer F. S. Empirical generalizations from reference price and asymmetric price response research. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(3, Part 2 of 2):G161–G169Link, Google Scholar
• Kim J., Allenby G. M., Rossi P. E. Modeling consumer demand for variety. Marketing Sci. (2002) 21(3):229–251Link, Google Scholar
• Krishna A. The normative impact of consumer price expectations for multiple brands on consumer purchase behavior. Marketing Sci. (1992) 11(Summer):266–286Link, Google Scholar
• Lewbel A. Exact aggregation and a representative consumer. Econometrica (1989) 104(3):621–633Google Scholar
• Lucas R. E., Brunner K., Meltzer A. H. Econometric policy evaluation: A critique. The Phillips Curve and Labor Markets, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy (1976) 1:19–46Reprinted in R. E. Lucas, Jr. Studies in Modern Business Cycle Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge, MACrossref, Google Scholar
• Lucas R. E.Models of Business Cycles (1987) (Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Manchanda P., Rossi P. E., Chintagunta P. K. Response modeling with non-random marketing mix variables. J. Marketing Res. (2004) 41:467–478Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFadden D., Zarembka P. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Frontiers of Econometrics (1974) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Mehta N., Rajiv S., Srinivasan K. Price uncertainty and consumer search: A structural model of consideration set formation. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(1):58–84Link, Google Scholar
• Mehta N., Rajiv S., Srinivasan K. Role of forgetting in memory-based choice decisions. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2004) 2(2):107–140Crossref, Google Scholar
• Melnikov O. Demand for differentiated durable products: The case of the U.S. computer printer market. (2000) . Working paper, Yale University, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
• Moshkin N., Shachar R. The asymmetric information model of state dependence. Marketing Sci. (2002) 21(4):435–454Link, Google Scholar
• Nair H., Dubé J.-P., Chintagunta P. K. Accounting for primary and secondary demand effects with aggregate data. Marketing Sci. (2003) 24(3):444–460Link, Google Scholar
• Nevo A. Mergers with differentiated products: The case of ready-to-eat cereal industry. RAND J. Econom. (2000) 31(3):395–421Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pakes A., Sims Christopher A. Dynamic structural models, problems and prospects: Mixed continuous discrete controls and market interactions. Advances in Econometrics Sixth World Congress (1994) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pakes A., Ostrovsky M., Berry S. Computationally simple estimators for entry games. (2003) . Working paper, Department of Economics, Harvard University, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
• Pesendorfer M., Schmidt-Dengler P. Identification and estimation of dynamic games. (2004) . Working paper, London School of Economics and Political Science, University of London, London, UKGoogle Scholar
• Reiss P. C., Wolak F. A. Structural econometric modelling: Rationales and examples from industrial organisation. Handbook Econometrics (2002) . Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Rotemberg J., Saloner G. A super-game theoretic model of business cycles and price wars during booms. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76(3):390–407Google Scholar
• Roy R., Chintagunta P. K., Haldar S. A framework for analyzing habits, “hand-of-past” and heterogeneity in dynamic brand choice. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15(3):280–299Link, Google Scholar
• Rust J., Sims Christopher A. Estimation of dynamic structural models, problems and prospects: Discrete decision processes. Advances in Econometrics Sixth World Congress (1994) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaffer G., Zhang J. Competitive coupon targeting. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(4):395–416Link, Google Scholar
• Shugan S. Editorial: Endogeneity in marketing decision models. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(1):1–3Link, Google Scholar
• Song I., Chintagunta P. A micromodel of new product adoption with heterogeneous and forward-looking consumers: Application to the digital camera category. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2003) 1(4):371–407Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staiger D., Stock J. H. Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica (1997) 65:557–586Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stoker T. Empirical approaches to the problem of aggregation over individuals. J. Econom. Literature (1993) 31(December):1827–1874Google Scholar
• Sudhir K. Competitive pricing behavior in the auto market: A structural analysis. Marketing Sci. (2001) 20(1):42–60Link, Google Scholar
• Sudhir K., Chintagunta P. K., Kadiyali V. Time-varying competition. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(1):96–109Link, Google Scholar
• Sun B. Promotion effect on endogenous consumption. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(3):430–443Link, Google Scholar
• Sun B., Neslin S., Srinivasan K. Measuring the impact of promotions on brand switching under rational consumer behavior. J. Marketing Res. (2003) 40(4):389–405Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomadsen R. The effects of ownership structure on prices in geographically differentiated industries. (2004) . Working paper, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Vilcassim N. J., Kadiyali V., Chintagunta P. Investigating dynamic multifirm interactions in price and advertising. Management Sci. (1999) 45(4):499–518Link, Google Scholar
• Wedel M., Kamakura W. A.Market Segmentation: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations (2000) (Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winer Russell S. A reference price model of brand choice for frequently purchased products. J. Consumer Res. (1986) 13(2):250–256Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang S., Chen Y., Allenby G. Bayesian analysis of simultaneous demand and supply. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2003) 1:251–275Crossref, Google Scholar