An Integrated Choice Model Incorporating Alternative Mechanisms for Consumers’ Reactions to In-Store Display and Feature Advertising
Published Online:1 May 2006https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1050.0170
References
- Heterogeneity and purchase event feedback in choice models: An empirical analysis with implications for model building. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1999) 16:177–198Crossref, Google Scholar
- The effects of in-store display and feature advertising on consideration sets. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1995) 12:67–80Crossref, Google Scholar
- Studying consideration effects in empirical choice models using scanner panel data. J. Marketing Res. (1995) 32(1):30–41Crossref, Google Scholar
- Limited choice sets, local price response, and implied measures of price competition. J. Marketing Res. (1996) 33(May):163–173Crossref, Google Scholar
- Estimating a multinomial probit model of brand choice using the method of simulated moments. Marketing Sci. (1992) 11(4):386–407Link, Google Scholar
- . An elimination by aspects model of consumer response to promotion calibrated on UPC scanner data. J. Marketing Res. (1990) 27(August):322–332Crossref, Google Scholar
- A choice model with conjunctive, disjunctive, and compensatory screening rules. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(3):391–406Link, Google Scholar
- Evaluating the multiple effects of retail promotions on brand loyal and brand switching segment. J. Marketing Res. (1992) 29(February):76–89Crossref, Google Scholar
- . Impact of sales promotions on when, what, and how much to buy. J. Marketing Res. (1988) 25(November):342–355Crossref, Google Scholar
- . An evaluation cost model of consideration sets. J. Consumer Res. (1990) 16(March):393–408Crossref, Google Scholar
- Promotion signal: Proxy for a price cut? J. Consumer Res. (1990) 17(June):74–81Crossref, Google Scholar
- Compensatory choice models of noncompensatory processes: The effect of varying context. J. Consumer Res. (1984) 11(June):528–541Crossref, Google Scholar
- . When choice models fails: Compensatory models in negatively correlated environments. J. Marketing Res. (1989) 24(August):255–270Crossref, Google Scholar
- A probabilistic choice model for market segmentation and elasticity structure. J. Marketing Res. (1989) 26(November):379–390Crossref, Google Scholar
- Narrow focusing: Why the relative position of a good in its category matters more than it should. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(2):194–205Link, Google Scholar
- Developing synergies between promotions and brands in different price-quality tiers. J. Marketing Res. (2002) 39(May):379–390Google Scholar
- Task complexity and contingent processing in brand choice. J. Consumer Res. (1979) 6(September):154–165Crossref, Google Scholar
- . Price uncertainty and consumer search: A structural model of consideration set formation. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(1):58–84Link, Google Scholar
- . A multiplicative fixed-effects model of consumer choice. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15(3):243–261Link, Google Scholar
- . Measuring the dynamic effects of promotions on brand choice. J. Marketing Res. (1996) 33(February):20–35Crossref, Google Scholar
- Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis. Organ. Behav. Human Performance (1976) 16(August):366–387Crossref, Google Scholar
- Development and testing of a model of consideration set composition. J. Marketing Res. (1991) 28(November):429–441Crossref, Google Scholar
- Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Statist. (1978) 6:461–464Crossref, Google Scholar
- Making the cut: Modeling and analyzing choice set restriction in scanner panel data. J. Marketing Res. (1995) 32(August):255–266Crossref, Google Scholar
- Semiparametric analysis to estimate the deal effect curve. J. Marketing Res. (2001) 38(May):197–215Crossref, Google Scholar
- Decomposing the sales promotion bump with store data. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(3):317–334Link, Google Scholar
- . Customizing promotions in online stores. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):561–578Link, Google Scholar

