The Motion Picture Industry: Critical Issues in Practice, Current Research, and New Research Directions

References

• Albert S. Movie stars and the distribution of financially successful films in the motion picture industry. J. Cultural Econom. (1998) 22:249–270Crossref, Google Scholar
• American Marketing AssociationDictionary of marketing terms (2004) (American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL) . www.marketingpower.comGoogle Scholar
• Austin B. A. Motivations for movie attendance. Comm. Quart. (1986) 34(2):115–126Crossref, Google Scholar
• Austin B. A.Immediate Seating: A Look at Movie Audiences (1989) (Wadsworth, Belmont, CA) Google Scholar
• Bajaj A., Kekre S., Srinivasan K. Managing NPD: Cost and schedule performance in design and manufacturing. Management Sci. (2004) 50(4):527–536Link, Google Scholar
• Bayus B. Speed-to-market and new product development tradeoffs. J. Product Innovation Management (1997) 14:485–497Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bayus B., Jain S., Rao A. Too little, too early: Introduction timing and new product performance in the personal digital assistant industry. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 34:50–63Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker B. W., Brewer B., Dickerson B., Magee R., Austin B. A. The influence of personal values on movie preferences. Current Research in Film: Audiences, Economics, and Law (1985) 1(Ablex, Norwood, NJ) 37–50Google Scholar
• Bellizi J. A., Robert E. H. Environmental color, consumer feelings, and purchase likelihood. Psych. and Marketing (1992) 9(5):347–363Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belson David. IEs and the Movies (1996) (IIE Solutions)26–31Google Scholar
• Blowers G. H., Austin B. A. Psychological approaches to film audience research: A critique. Current Research in Film: Audiences, Economics, and Law (1991) 5(Ablex, Norwood, NJ) 56–67Google Scholar
• Boston Consulting GroupDigital Cinema Primer (2002) (Boston Consulting Group, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Burke R. R., Rangaswamy A., Wind J., Eliashberg J. A knowledge-based system for advertising design. Marketing Sci. (1990) 9(3):212–229Link, Google Scholar
• Caves R. E.Creative Industries: Contracts Between Art and Commerce (2001) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Chevalier J. A., Mayzlin D. The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J. Marketing Res. (2003) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Chipty T. Vertical integration, market foreclosure, and consumer welfare in the cable television industry. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2001) 91(3):428–453Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chisholm D. C. Profit-sharing versus fixed-payment contracts: Evidence from the motion pictures industry. J. Law, Econom. Organ. (1997) 13(1):169–201Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chisholm D. C. The war of attrition and optimal timing of motion-picture releases. (2000) . Working paper, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PAGoogle Scholar
• Cleeren K., Dekimpe M. G., Verboven F. Intra- and inter-channel competition in local service sectors. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2005) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Cohen M. A., Eliashberg J., Ho T. H. New product development: The performance and time-to-market tradeoff. Management Sci. (1996) 42(2):173–186Link, Google Scholar
• Collins A., Hand C., Snell M. C. What makes a blockbuster? Economic analysis of film success in the United Kingdom. Managerial Decision Econom. (2002) 23(6):343–354Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crawford M., Di Benedetto A.New Products Management (2003) (McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Cuadrado M., Frasquet M. Segmentation of cinema audiences: An exploratory study applied to young consumers. J. Cultural Econom. (1999) 23(4):257–267Google Scholar
• D’Astous A., Touil N. Consumer evaluations of movies on the basis of critics’ judgments. Psych. and Marketing (1999) 16(8):677–694Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahan E., Hauser J. R. The virtual customer. J. Product Innovation Management (2002) 19(5):332–353Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daniels B., Leedy D., Sills S. D.Movie Money: Understanding Hollywood’s (Creative) Accounting Practices (1998) (Silman-James Press, Los Angeles, CA) Google Scholar
• Davis P. Spatial competition in retail markets: Movie theaters. (2001) . Working paper, London School of Economics, London, UKGoogle Scholar
• Davis P. Entry, cannibalization and bankruptcy in the U.S. motion picture exhibition market. (2003) . Working paper, London School of Economics, London, UKGoogle Scholar
• Davis P. The effect of local competition on retail prices: The U.S. motion picture exhibition market. J. Law Econom. (2005) 48(2):677Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C. N. The digitization of word-of-mouth: Promise and challenges of online reputation systems. Management Sci. (2003) 49(10):1407Link, Google Scholar
• Deloitte Pirates: Digital theft in the film industry. (2004) . Deloitte & Touche LLP, London, UK. www.deloitte.co.ukGoogle Scholar
• DeMaday A. An enquiry respecting the cinematograph made in the schools of Neuchatel, Lausanne, and Geneva. Internat. Rev. Ed. Cinematography (1929) November/December):531–522Google Scholar
• Desai M. A., Loeb G. J., Veblen M. F. The strategy and sources of motion picture finance. (2002) . Harvard Business School Note 9-203-007, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• De Silva I., Litman B. R. Consumer selection of motion pictures. The Motion Picture Mega-Industry (1998) (Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights, MA) Google Scholar
• De Vany A., Walls W. D. Bose-Einstein dynamics and adaptive contracting in the motion picture industry. Econom. J. (1996) 106(November):1493–1514Google Scholar
• De Vany A., Walls W. D. Uncertainty in the movie industry: Does star power reduce the terror of the box office? J. Cultural Econom. (1999) 23(4):285–318Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Vany A., Walls W. D. Private information, demand cascades, and the blockbuster strategy. (2000) . Working paper, Department of Economics, University of California, Irvine, CAGoogle Scholar
• De Vany A., Walls W. D. Does Hollywood make too many R-rated movies? J. Bus. (2002) 75(3):425–451Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ding M., Eliashberg J. Structuring the new product development pipeline. Management Sci. (2002) 48(3):343–363Link, Google Scholar
• Dodds J. C., Holbrook M. B., Austin B. A. What’s an Oscar worth? An empirical estimation of the effects of nominations and awards on movie distribution and revenues. Current Research in Film: Audiences, Economics, and Law (1988) 4(Ablex, Norwood, NJ) 72–88Google Scholar
• Doyle B. Return of the super cinema. Hist. Today (1998) 48(2):2–5Google Scholar
• Big trouble for big pharmaEconomist (2003) December 6):55Google Scholar
• Einav L. Gross seasonality and underlying seasonality: Evidence from the U.S. motion picture industry. (2003a) . SIEPR Discussion Paper 02-36, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Einav L. Not all rivals look alike: Estimating an equilibrium model of the release date timing game. (2003b) . Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Elberse A. Demand and supply dynamics for sequentially released products in international markets: An empirical application to motion pictures. (2002) . Ph.D. dissertation, London Business School, London, UKGoogle Scholar
• Elberse A. Marvel enterprises. (2004) . Harvard Business School Case, N9-505-001, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Elberse A., Anand B. The effectiveness of pre-release advertising for motion pictures. (2005) . Working paper, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Elberse A., Eliashberg J. Demand and supply dynamics for sequentially released products in international markets: The case of motion pictures. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(3):329–354Link, Google Scholar
• Eliashberg J., Moul C. C. The film exhibition business: Critical issues, practice and research. A Concise Handbook of Movie Industry Economics (2005) (Cambridge University Press, New York) 138–162Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eliashberg J., Sawhney M. S. Modeling goes to Hollywood: Predicting individual differences in movie enjoyment. Management Sci. (1994) 40(9):1151–1173Link, Google Scholar
• Eliashberg J., Shugan S. M. Film critics: Influencers or predictors? J. Marketing (1997) 61(April):68–78Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eliashberg J., Jonker J.-J., Sawhney M. S., Wierenga B. MOVIEMOD: An implementable decision-support system for prerelease market evaluation of motion pictures. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19(3):226–243Link, Google Scholar
• Eliashberg J., Swami S., Weinberg C. B., Wierenga B. Implementing and evaluating SILVERSCREENER: A marketing management support system for movie exhibitors. Interfaces (2001) 31(3, Part 2):S108–S127Link, Google Scholar
• Eliashberg J., Swami S., Weinberg C. B., Wierenga B. Operations research in the movies: Scheduling the multiplexes. (2005) . Working paper, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
• Eliashberg J., Miller S. J., Swami S., Weinberg C. B., Wierenga B. Marketing models for movie managers: Model development and implementation experience. (2003) Marketing Sci. Conf.University of Maryland, College Park, MDGoogle Scholar
• European Audiovisual Observatory Focus 2003: World market film trends. (2003) . www.obs.coe.intGoogle Scholar
• Filson D., Switzer D., Besocke P. At the movies: The economics of exhibition contracts. Econom. Inquiry (2005) 43(2):354–369Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frank B. Optimal timing of movie releases in ancillary markets: The case of video releases. J. Cultural Econom. (1994) 18:125–133Google Scholar
• Frank R. H., Cook P. J.The Winner-Take-All Society (1995) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Gambaro M. The relationship between different distribution channels for movies: Some lessons from the case of free television. (2004) 15th International Telecommunications Society Conf.Berlin, GermanyCrossref, Google Scholar
• Godes D., Mayzlin D. Using online conversations to study word of mouth communication. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):545–560Link, Google Scholar
• Goettler Ronald L., Leslie Phillip. Co-financing to manage risk in the motion picture industry. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2004) 14(2):231Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gruca T. The IEM movie box office market integrating marketing and finance using electronic markets. J. Marketing Ed. (2000) 22:5–14Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanssen A. F. The block-booking of films: A re-examination. J. Law Econom. (2000) 43(October):395–426Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauser J. R. Metrics thermostat. J. Product Innovation Management (2001) 18:134–153Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hennig-Thurau T., Walsh G., Wruck O. An investigation into the factors determining the success of service innovations: The case of motion pictures. Acad. Marketing Sci. Rev. (2001) 6:1–23Google Scholar
• Bronfman: Event films need event ticket pricesHollywood Reporter (1998) April 1Google Scholar
• If you spend it they will comeHollywood Reporter (2004) May 18):S-3Google Scholar
• Husted B. W. The impact of national culture on software piracy. J. Bus. Ethics (2000) 26:197–211Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jedidi K., Krider R. E., Weinberg C. B. Clustering at the movies. Marketing Lett. (1998) 9(4):393–405Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones J. M., Ritz C. J. Incorporating distribution into new product diffusion models. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1991) 8(June):91–112Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jowett G. S., Austin B. A. Giving them what they want: Movie audience research before 1950. Current Research in Film: Audiences, Economics, and Law (1985) 1(Ablex, Norwood, NJ) 19–36Google Scholar
• Katz E., Lazarsfeld P. F.Personal Influence (1955) (Free Press, Glencoe, IL) Google Scholar
• Kotler Phillip. Atmospherics as a marketing tool. J. Retailing (1973–1974) 49(4):48–63Google Scholar
• Krider R. E., Weinberg C. B. Competitive dynamics and the introduction of new products: The motion picture timing game. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35(February):1–15Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazersfeld P. Audience research in the movie field. Ann. Amer. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. (1947) 254(November):160–168Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leenders M. A. A. M., Eliashberg J. Antecedents and consequences of third-party products evaluation systems: Lessons from the international motion picture industry. (2004) . Working paper, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
• Lehmann D. R., Weinberg C. B. Sales through sequential distribution channels: An application to movies and videos. J. Marketing (2000) 64(3):18–33Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levy M., Weitz B. A.Retailing Management (2001) 4th ed.(McGraw-Hill Irwin, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Lewis H. T.The Motion Picture Industry (1933) (D. Van Nostrand, New York) Google Scholar
• Lewison D. M.Retailing (1994) 5th ed.(Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
• Litman B. R. Predicting success of theatrical movies: An empirical study. J. Popular Culture (1983) 16:159–175Crossref, Google Scholar
• Litman B. R., Ahn H., Litman B. R. Predicting financial success of motion pictures. The Motion Picture Mega-Industry (1998) (Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights, MA) Google Scholar
• Litman B. R., Kohl L. S. Predicting financial success of motion pictures: The ’80s experience. J. Media Econom. (1989) 2:35–50Crossref, Google Scholar
• Little J. D. C. A model of adaptive control of promotional spending. Oper. Res. (1966) 14(6):1075–1098Link, Google Scholar
• Showtime for theater owners; More Americans went to movies this year than anytime since 1959Los Angeles Times (2002) December 26):C1Google Scholar
• McQuail D.Mass Communication Theory: An Introduction (1994) 3rd ed.(Sage, London, UK) Google Scholar
• Miller D. Strategic responses to the three kinds of uncertainty: Product line simplicity at the Hollywood film studios. J. Management (1999) 25(1):97–116Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D., Shamsie J. The resource based view of the firm in two environments: The Hollywood film studios from 1936 to 1965. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39:519–543Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D., Shamsie J. Learning across the life cycle: Experimentation and performance among the Hollywood studio heads. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22:725–745Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moller K., Karppinen P. Role of motives and attributes in consumer motion picture choice. J. Econom. Psych. (1983) 4(3):239–262Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mortimer J. Vertical contracts in the video rental industry. (2004) . Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Motion Picture Association of America MPAA economic review. (2004) . www.mpaa.orgGoogle Scholar
• Moul C. C. Word-of-mouth versus market saturation: Explaining demand dynamics for movies and music. (2006) . Working paper, Department of Economics, Washington University, St. Louis, MOGoogle Scholar
• Neelamegham R., Chintagunta P. A Bayesian model to forecast new product performance in domestic and international markets. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(2):115–136Link, Google Scholar
• Neelamegham R., Jain D. Consumer choice process for experience goods: An econometric model and analysis. J. Marketing Res. (1999) 36(3):373–386Crossref, Google Scholar
• Now on the PC screen: Scent of a kitchenNew York Times (2000) September 13Google Scholar
• Norton J. A., Bass F. M. A diffusion theory of adoption and substitution for successive generations of high-technology products. Management Sci. (1987) 33(9):1069–1086Link, Google Scholar
• Oberholzer F., Strumpf K. The effect of file sharing on record sales: An empirical analysis. J. Political Econom. (2004) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Orbach B. Y. Antitrust and pricing in the motion picture industry. Yale J. Regulation (2004) 21(2):317–367Google Scholar
• Orbach B. Y., Einav L. Uniform prices for differentiated goods: The case of the movie-theater industry. (2001) . Working paper, Harvard Law & Economics Center, Olin Discussion Paper 337, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Palmgreen P., Lawrence P. A., Austin B. A. Avoidances, gratifications, and consumption of theatrical films: The rest of the story. Current Research in Film: Audiences, Economics, and Law (1991) 5(Ablex, Norwood, NJ) 39–55Google Scholar
• Palmgreen P., Cook P. L., Harvill J. G., Helm D. M., Austin B. A. The motivational framework of moviegoing: Uses and avoidances of theatrical films. Current Research in Film: Audiences, Economics, and Law (1988) Vol 4(Ablex, Norwood, NJ) 1–23Google Scholar
• Peitz M., Waelbroeck P. Piracy of digital products: A critical review of the economics literature. (2003) . CESifo Working Paper Series 1071, Munich, GermanyGoogle Scholar
• Peitz M., Waelbroeck P. The effect of internet piracy on CD sales: Cross-section evidence. (2004) . Center for Economic Studies, CESifo Working Paper Series 1122, Munich, GermanyGoogle Scholar
• TV ads play on the big screenPhiladelphia Inquirer (2003) February 2):B1Google Scholar
• Prag J., Casavant J. An empirical study of the determinants of revenues and marketing expenditures in the motion picture industry. J. Cultural Econom. (1994) 18:217–235Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quelch J., Elberse A., Harrington A. The passion of the Christ (A). (2004) . Harvard Business School Case 9-505-020, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Radas S., Shugan S. M. Seasonal marketing and timing new product introductions. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35(3):296–315Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rangaswamy A., Eliashberg J., Burke R. R., Wind J. Developing marketing expert systems: An application to international negotiations. J. Marketing (1989) 53(4):24–49Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raut S., Swami S., Lee E., Weinberg C. B. Contract design in complex supply chains using genetic algorithm and game theoretic approaches. Proc. 9th Internat. Sympos. Logist. (2004) Institute of Management, Bangalore, IndiaGoogle Scholar
• Ravid S. A. Information, blockbusters, and stars: A study of the film industry. J. Bus. (1999) 72(4):463–492Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sawhney M. S., Eliashberg J. A parsimonious model for forecasting gross box-office revenues of motion pictures. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15(2):113–131Link, Google Scholar
• Schmitt B. H.Experiential Marketing (1999) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Scott A. J.On Hollywood: The Place, The Industry (2005) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Report on the implications of digital technology for the film industryScreen Digest (2002) . Department for Culture, Media and Sport, Creative Industries Division, London, UKGoogle Scholar
• ProductionShowbiz Data (2004) . Retrieved January 2004 from www.showbizdata.comGoogle Scholar
• Shugan S. M. Forecasting the box office of new films before they are made. (2000a) . Working paper, University of Florida, Gainesville, FLGoogle Scholar
• Shugan S. M., Eliashberg J., Mallen B. Recent research on the motion picture industry. Proc. Inaugural Bus. Econom. Scholars Workshop in Motion Picture Indust. Stud. (2000b) Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL:65–86Google Scholar
• Shugan S. M. Editorial: Endogeneity in marketing decisions models. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(1):1–3Link, Google Scholar
• Shugan S. M., Swait J. Enabling movie design and cumulative box office predictions. American Research Foundation Entertainment Conf. Proc. (2000) Beverly Hills, CAGoogle Scholar
• Simonoff J. S., Sparrow I. R. Predicting movie grosses: Winners and losers, blockbusters and sleepers. Chance (2000) 13(3):15–24Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith S. P., Smith V. K. Successful movies: A preliminary empirical analysis. Appl. Econom. (1986) 18:501–507Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sochay S. Predicting the performance of motion pictures. J. Media Econom. (1994) 7(4):1–20Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sood S., Dreze X. Brand extensions of hedonic goods: Movie sequel evaluations. J. Consumer Res. (2004) Google Scholar
• Sorenson O., Waguespack D. Social networks and exchange: Self-confirming dynamics in Hollywood. (2003) . Working paper, Anderson School of Management, UCLA, Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
• Spann M., Skiera B. Internet-based virtual stock markets for business forecasting. Management Sci. (2003) 49(10):1310–1326Link, Google Scholar
• Squire J. E.The Movie Business Book (2004) 3rd ed.(Fireside, Simon & Schuster, New York) Google Scholar
• Industry surveys: Movies and home entertainmentStandard & Poor’s (2004) February 12Google Scholar
• Swami S., Eliashberg J., Weinberg C. B. SilverScreener: A modeling approach to movie screens management. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(3):352–372Link, Google Scholar
• Swami S., Puterman M. L., Weinberg C. B. Play it again Sam? Optimal replacement policies for motion picture exhibitors. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2001) 3(4):369–386Link, Google Scholar
• Tyagi R. K. Technological advances, transaction costs and consumer welfare. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(3):335–344Link, Google Scholar
• Urban G. L., Hauser J. R.Design and Marketing of New Products (1980) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• U.K. Film Council The Indian media and entertainment industry. (2002) . Report by P. Vir, J. Woodward, N. Watson. Retrieved January 2003 from http://www.ukfilmcouncil.org.uk/filmindustry/india/Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Labor 2001 national industry-specific occupational employment and wage estimates: SIC 78 - motion pictures. (2004) . Retrieved May 2004 from http://www.bls.gov/oes/2001/oesi2_78.htmGoogle Scholar
• Is H’wood’s biz model outdated?Variety (2002) December 10Google Scholar
• Bring your own moneyVariety (2003a) April 27Google Scholar
• Rough cuts on movie moneyVariety (2003b) April 27Google Scholar
• How great is day-and-date?Variety (2003c) May 11Google Scholar
• How’d: A sequel opportunity townVariety (2003d) June 15Google Scholar
• Falling off the brand wagon: Studios cope with ad-versity in lining up promo partnersVariety (2003e) October 20Google Scholar
• The incredible shrinking audVariety (2004a) January 4Google Scholar
• Movie sequels click with consumersVariety (2004b) January 11Google Scholar
• Net heads finally get some respectVariety (2004c) April 18Google Scholar
• Vogel H. L.Entertainment Industry Economics (2001) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York) Google Scholar
• Handicapping “SeabiscuitWall Street Journal (2003) July 28Google Scholar
• Merger could alter Hollywood balance of powerWall Street Journal (2004a) February 13):B1Google Scholar
• Summer film fightWall Street Journal (2004c) April 26):B1Google Scholar
• Boss talk: Q-and-A with NBC Universal’s Bob WrightWall Street Journal (2004d) December 22Google Scholar
• Themed megaplexes entice shoppers to mallsWall Street Journal (2005) June 16Google Scholar
• Wallace W. T., Seigerman A., Holbrook M. B. The role of actors and actresses in the success of films: How much is a movie star worth? J. Cultural Econom. (1993) 17(1):1–27Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weinberg C. B., Moul C. C. Profits out of the picture: Research issues and revenue sources beyond the North American box office. A Concise Handbook of Movie Industry Economics (2005) (Cambridge University Press, New York) 163–203Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weinstein M. Profit-sharing contracts in Hollywood: Evolution and analysis. J. Legal Stud. (1998) 27(1):67–112Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams W., Shapiro M. E., Austin B. A. A study of the effects in-home entertainment alternatives have on film attendance. Current Research in Film: Audiences, Economics, and Law (1985) 1(Ablex, Norwood, NJ) 93–100Google Scholar
• Wind J., Mahajan V. Issues and opportunities in new product development: An introduction to the special issue. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 34(February):1–12Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wolf M. J.The Entertainment Economy (1999) (Times Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Zuckerman E. W., Kim T. Y. The critical trade-off: Identity assignment and box office success in the feature film industry. Indust. Corporate Change (2003) 12(1):27–67Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zufryden F. S. Linking advertising to box office performance of new film releases: A marketing planning model. J. Advertising Res. (1996) 36(4):29–41Google Scholar
• Zufryden F. S. New film website promotion and box-office performance. J. Advertising Res. (2000) 40(1/2):55–64Crossref, Google Scholar