The Effect of Group Interactions on Satisfaction Judgments: Satisfaction Escalation

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1050.0182

References

  • Abrams Dominic, Wetherell Margaret, Cochrane Sandra, Hogg Michael, Turner John. Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. British J. Soc. Psych. (1990) 29:97–119CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson Eugene W., Sullivan Mary W. The antecedents and consequences of customer satisfaction for firms. Marketing Sci. (1993) 12(Spring):125–143LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bearden William O., Netemeyer Richard G., Teel Jesse E. Measurement of consumer susceptibility to interpersonal influence. J. Consumer Res. (1989) 15(March):473–481CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bohlmann Jonathan D., Qualls William J. Household preference revisions and decision making: The role of disconfirmation. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2001) 18:319–339CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bolton Ruth N. A dynamic model of the duration of the customer’s relationship with a continuous service provider: The role of satisfaction. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(1):45–65LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bolton Ruth N., Drew James H. A multistage model of customers’ assessments of service quality and value. J. Consumer Res. (1991) 17(March):375–384CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bolton Ruth N., Lemon Katherine N. A dynamic model of customers’ usage of services: Usage as an antecedent and consequence of satisfaction. J. Marketing Res. (1999) 36(May):171–186CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boulding William, Kalra Ajay, Staelin Richard, Zeithaml Valarie A. A dynamic process model of service quality: From expectations to behavioral intention. J. Marketing Res. (1993) 30(February):7–27CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bowman Douglas, Narayandas Das. Linking customer management effort to customer profitability in business markets. J. Marketing Res. (2004) 41(4):433–447CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brauer Markus, Judd Charles, Gliner Melissa. The effects of repeated expressions on attitude polarization during group discussions. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1995) 68(6):1014–1029CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis Harry L. Decision making within the household. J. Consumer Res. (1976) 2:241–260CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis Harry L., Hoch Stephen J., Ragsdale E. K. Easton. An anchoring and adjustment model of spousal predictions. J. Consumer Res. (1986) 13(June):25–37CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edwards Kari, Smith Edward E. A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1996) 71(1):5–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glazer Rashi, Steckel Joel H., Winer Russell S. Group process and decision performance in a simulated marketing environment. J. Bus. Res. (1987) 15:545–557CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Godes David, Mayzlin Dina. Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):545–560LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Greene William H.Econometric Analysis (1990) (Macmillan Publishing, New York) Google Scholar
  • Grewal Rajdeep, Mehta Raj, Kardes Frank R. The timing of repeat purchases of consumer durable goods: The role of functional bases of consumer attitudes. J. Marketing Res. (2004) 41(February):101–115CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hair Joseph H., Anderson Rolph E., Tatham Ronald L., Black William C.Multivariate Data Analysis (1995) 4th ed.(Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Hedeker Donald, Gibbons Robert, Flay Brian. Random-effects regression models for clustered data with an example from smoking prevention research. J. Consulting Clinical Psych. (1994) 62(4):757–765CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hogarth Robin M., Einhorn Hillel J. Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model. Cognitive Psych. (1992) 24(6):1–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hogg Michael, Vaughan Graham. Social Psychology (2002) 3rd ed.(Prentice Hall, London, UK) Google Scholar
  • Irwin Julie R., McClelland Gary H. Misleading heuristics and moderated multiple regression models. J. Marketing Res. (2001) 38(February):100–109CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson Michael D., Anderson Eugene W., Fornell Claes. Rational and adaptive performance expectations in a customer satisfaction framework. J. Consumer Res. (1995) 21(March):695–707CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman Daniel, Tversky Amos. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47(2):263–291CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan Martin F., Miller Charles E. Group decision making and normative versus informational influence: Effects of type of issue and assigned decision rule. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1987) 53(2):306–313CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kelman Herbert C. Processes of opinion change. Public Opinion Quart. (1961) 25(1):57–78CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kumar Nirmalya A., Stern Louis W., Anderson James C. Conducting interorganizational research using key informants. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(6):1633–1651CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mackie Diane M. Social identification effects in group polarization. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1986) 50(4):720–728CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Menon Geeta, Bickart Barbara, Sudman Seymour, Blair Johnny. How well do you know your partner? Strategies for formulating proxy-reports and their effects on convergence to self-reports. J. Marketing Res. (1995) 32(February):75–84CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mittal Vikas, Kumar Pankaj, Tsiros Michael. Attribute-level performance, satisfaction, and behavioral intentions over time: A consumption-system approach. J. Marketing (1999) 63(April):88–101CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mittal Vikas, Ross William T., Baldasare Patrick M. The asymmetric impact on negative and positive attribute-level performance on overall satisfaction and repurchase intentions. J. Marketing (1998) 62(January):33–47CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Norris Dwight R., Niebuhr Robert E. Group variables and gaming success. Simulation Games (1980) 11(3):301–312CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oliver Richard L. A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. J. Marketing Res. (1980) 17(November):460–469CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oliver Richard L.Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer (1997) (McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Oliver Richard L., Burke Raymond R. Expectation processes in satisfaction formation: A field study. J. Service Res. (1999) 1(3):196–214CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oliver Richard L., Winer Russell S. A framework for the formation and structure of consumer expectations: Review and propositions. J. Econom. Psych. (1987) 8:469–499CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parasuraman A., Zeithaml Valarie A., Berry Leonard L. SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. J. Retailing (1988) 64(1):12–40Google Scholar
  • Patterson Paul G., Johnson Lester W., Spreng Richard A. Modeling the determinants of customer satisfaction for business-to-business professional services. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (1997) 25(1):4–17CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peter J. Paul, Churchill Gilbert A., Brown Tom J. Caution in the use of difference scores in consumer research. J. Consumer Res. (1993) 19(March):655–662CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Qualls William J., Rosa José Antonio. Assessing industrial buyers’ perceptions of quality and their effects on satisfaction. Indust. Marketing Management (1995) 24:359–368CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rabin Matthew, Schrag Joel L. First impressions matter: A model of confirmation bias. Quart. J. Econom. (1999) 65(February):37–82CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Russo J. Edward, Medvec Victoria Husted, Meloy Margaret G. The distortion of information during decisions. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1996) 66(1):102–110CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rust Roland T., Inman J. Jeffrey, Jia Jianmin, Zahorik Anthony J. What you don’t know about customer-perceived quality: The role of customer expectation distributions. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(1):77–92LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schlosser Ann E., Shavitt Sharon. Anticipating discussion about a product: Rehearsing what to say can affect your judgments. J. Consumer Res. (2002) 29(June):101–115CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seashore S.Group Cohesiveness in the Industrial Work Group (1954) (Survey Research Center Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI) Google Scholar
  • Slotegraaf Rebecca J., Inman J. Jeffrey. Longitudinal shifts in the drivers of satisfaction with product quality: The role of attribute resolvability. J. Marketing Res. (2004) 41(3):269–280CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tajfel Henri, Turner John C., Austin W., Worchel S. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (1979) (Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA) Google Scholar
  • Tse David K., Wilton Peter C. Models of consumer satisfaction formation: An extension. J. Marketing Res. (1988) 25(May):204–212CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Turner John C., Wetherell Margaret S., Hogg Michael A. Referent informational influence and group polarization. British J. Soc. Psych. (1989) 28:135–147CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Bruggen Gerrit H., Lilien Gary L., Kacker Manish. Informants in organizational marketing research: Why use multiple informants and how to aggregate responses. J. Marketing Res. (2002) 39(November):469–478CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van den Bulte Christophe, Stremersch Stefan. Social contagion and income heterogeneity in new product diffusion: A meta-analytic test. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):530–544LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Vorhies Douglas W., Morgan Neil A. Benchmarking marketing capabilities for sustainable competitive advantage. J. Marketing (2005) 69(January):80–94CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wilson Elizabeth J., Lilien Gary L., Wilson David T. Developing and testing a contingency paradigm of group choice in organizational buying. J. Marketing Res. (1991) 28(November):452–466CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zeithaml Valarie A. Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. J. Marketing (1988) 52(July):2–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.