Invited Commentary—Removing the Boundary Between Structural and Reduced-Form Models

References

• Bell D. R., Lattin J. M. Shopping behavior and consumer preference for store price format: Why “large basket” shoppers prefer EDLP. Marketing Sci. (2000) 17(1):66–88Link, Google Scholar
• Bronnenberg B. J., Rossi P. E., Vilcassim N. J. Structural modeling and policy simulation. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(1):22–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y., Yang S., Zhao Y. A structural approach to modeling negotiated prices of automobiles. (2004) . Working paper, Hong Kong University of Science and TechnologyGoogle Scholar
• Chiang J. A simultaneous approach to the whether, what, and how much to buy questions. Marketing Sci. (1991) 10(4):297–315Link, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta P. K. Investigating purchase incidence, brand choice, and purchase quantity decisions of households. Marketing Sci. (1993) 12(2):184–208Link, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta P. K., Dube J. P. Estimating a SKU-level brand choice model combining household panel data and store data. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(3):368–380Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta P. K., Erdem T., Rossi P. E., Wedel M. Structural modeling in marketing: Review and assessment. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(6):604–616Link, Google Scholar
• Dube J. P. Multiple discreteness and product differentiation: Strategy and demand for carbonated soft drinks. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(1):66–81Link, Google Scholar
• Erdem T., Keane M. Decision-making under uncertainty: Capturing dynamic brand choice processes in turbulent consumer goods markets. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15(1):1–20Link, Google Scholar
• Erdem T., Imai S., Keane M. Brand and quantity choice dynamics under price uncertainty. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2003) 1(1):5–64Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guadagni P. M., Little J. A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(2):203–238Link, Google Scholar
• Guo L. A model of temporal and horizontal variety choice. (2006) . Working paper, Hong Kong University of Science and TechnologyGoogle Scholar
• Guo L., Erdem T. Measuring usage flexibility in wireless tariff choice. (2006) . Working paper, Hong Kong University of Science and TechnologyGoogle Scholar
• Gupta S. Impact of sales promotions on when, what, and how much to buy. J. Marketing Res. (1988) 25(3):342–355Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendel I. Estimating multiple-discrete choice models: An application to computerization returns. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1999) 66(2):423–446Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyengar R. A structural demand analysis for wireless services under nonlinear pricing schemes. (2004) . Working paper, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Kim J., Allenby G. M., Rossi P. E. Modeling consumer demand for variety. Marketing Sci. (2002) 21(3):229–250Link, Google Scholar
• Kreps D. M. A representation theorem for “preference for flexibility”. Econometrica (1979) 47(3):565–577Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuksov D., Villas-Boas J. M. Endogeneity and individual consumer choice. (2005) . Working paper, University of California, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
• Li S., Sun B., Wilcox R. T. Cross-selling sequentially ordered products: An application to consumer banking services. J. Consumer Res. (2005) 42(2):233–240Google Scholar
• Lucas R. E., Brunner K., Meltzer A. H. Econometric policy evaluation: A critique. The Phillips Curve and Labor Markets. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy (1976) 1(North Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 19–46Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAlister L. A dynamic attribute satiation model of variety-seeking behavior. J. Consumer Res. (1982) 9(2):141–150Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFadden D., Zarembka P. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Frontiers of Econometrics (1974) (Academic Press, New York) 105–142Google Scholar
• McFadden D. Rationality for economists. J. Risk Uncertainty (1999) 19(1):73–105Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehta N., Rajiv S., Srinivasan K. Price uncertainty and consumer search: A structural model of consideration set formation. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(1):58–84Link, Google Scholar
• Misra S., Mohanty S. K. Estimating bargaining games in distribution channels. (2005) . Working paper, University of Rochester, Rochester, NYGoogle Scholar
• Nair H., Dube J. P., Chintagunta P. K. Accounting for primary and secondary demand effects with aggregate data. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(3):444–460Link, Google Scholar
• Narayanan S., Chintagunta P. K., Miravete E. The role of self selection and usage uncertainty in the demand for local telephone service. (2004) . Working paper, Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
• Pauwels K. How dynamic consumer response, competitor response, company support, and company inertia shape long-term marketing effectiveness. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):596–610Link, Google Scholar
• Shugan S. M. In search of data: An editorial. Marketing Sci. (2002) 21(4):369–377Link, Google Scholar
• Sudhir K. Structural analysis of competitive pricing in the presence of a strategic retailer. Marketing Sci. (2001) 20(1):244–264Link, Google Scholar
• Sun B. Promotion effect on endogenous consumption. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(3):430–443Link, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas J. M. A note on limited vs. full information estimation in non-linear models. (2005) . Working paper, University of California, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
• Villas-Boas S. B. Vertical relationships between manufacturers and retailers: Inference with limited data. (2006) . Working paper, University of California, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
• Villas-Boas J. M., Winer R. Endogeneity in brand choice models. Management Sci. (1999) 45(10):1324–1338Link, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas J. M., Zhao Y. Retailer, manufacturers, and individual consumers: Modeling the supply side in the ketchup marketplace. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(1):83–95Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh J. W. Flexibility in consumer purchasing for uncertain future tastes. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(2):148–165Link, Google Scholar
• Yang S., Chen Y., Allenby G. M. Bayesian analysis of simultaneous demand and supply. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2003) 1(3):251–275Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang J. The sound of silence. (2005) . Working paper, University of California, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar