Editorial: Errors in the Variables, Unobserved Heterogeneity, and Other Ways of Hiding Statistical Error

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1060.0215

References

  • Allenby Greg M., Rossi Peter E. Marketing models of consumer heterogeneity. J. Econometrics (1998) 89(1 & 2):57–78CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allenby Greg M., Lenk Peter J. Reassessing brand loyalty, price sensitivity, and merchandising effects on consumer brand choice. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. (1995) 13(3):281–289CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arora Neeraj, Allenby Greg M. Measuring the influence of individual preference structures in group decision making. J. Marketing Res. (1999) 36(4):476–487CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baker Michael, Melino Angelo. Duration dependence and nonparametric heterogeneity: A Monte Carlo study. J. Econometrics (2000) 96(2):357–393CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blattberg Robert, Buesing Thomas, Peacock Peter, Sen Subrata. Identifying the deal prone segment. J. Marketing Res. (1978) 15(3):369–377CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blaug Mark. The Methodology of Economics (1980) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Bradlow Eric T. Negative information and the three-parameter logistic model. J. Educational Behavioral Statist. (1996) 21(2):179–185Google Scholar
  • Bradlow Eric T., Rao Vithala R. A hierarchical Bayes model for assortment choice. J. Marketing Res. (2000) 37(2):259–268CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chang Kwang, Siddarth S., Weinberg Charles B. The impact of heterogeneity in purchase timing and price responsiveness on estimates of sticker shock effects. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(2):178–192LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chintagunta Pradeep K. Inertia and variety seeking in a model of brand purchase timing. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(3):253–270LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chintagunta Pradeep K., Prasad Alok R. An empirical investigation of the “dynamic McFadden” model of purchase timing and brand choice: Implications for market structure. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. (1998) 16(1):2–12CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chintagunta Pradeep K., Jain Dipak C., Vilcassim Naufel J. Investigating heterogeneity in brand preferences in logit models for panel data. J. Marketing Res. (1991) 28(4):417–428CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cochran William G., Cox Gertrude M.Experimental Designs (1957) 2nd ed.(Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Dubé Jean-Pierre, Manchanda Puneet. Differences in dynamic brand competition across markets: An empirical analysis. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(1):81–95LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Efron Bradley. Bayesians, frequentists, and scientists. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (2005) 100(469):1–5CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elbers Chris, Ridder Geert. True and spurious duration dependence: The identifiability of the proportional hazard model. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1982) 49(3):403–409CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Evgeniou Theodoros, Boussios Constantinos, Zacharia Giorgos. Generalized robust conjoint estimation. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(3):415–429LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fornell Claes, Larcker David F. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. J. Marketing Res. (1981) 18(3):382–388CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Friedman Milton, Friedman Milton. The methodology of positive economics. Essays in Positive Economics (1953) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
  • Gillies Donald A. A falsifying rule for probability statements. British J. Philos. Sci. (1971) 22(3):231–261CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Golder Peter N., Tellis Gerard J. Growing, growing, gone: Cascades, diffusion, and turning points in the product life cycle. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(2):207–218LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hauser John R. Comments on “Econometric models for probabilistic choice among products”. J. Bus. (1980) 53(3, Part 2):S31–S34CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hauser John R., Shugan Steven M. Intensity measures of consumer preference. Oper. Res. (1980) 28(2):278–320LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hausman Jerry A., Wise David A. A conditional probit model for qualitative choice: Discrete decisions recognizing interdependence and heterogeneous preferences. Econometrica (1978) 46(2):403–426CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hausman Jerry, McFadden Daniel. Specification tests for the multinomial logit model. Econometrica (1984) 52(5):1219–1240CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Healy Michael J. R. Is statistics a science? J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. A (General) (1978) 141(3):385–393CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heckman James J. Identifying the hand of past: Distinguishing state dependence from heterogeneity. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1991) 81(2):75–79Google Scholar
  • Heckman James J., Singer Burton. The identifiability of the proportional hazard model. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1984) 51(2):231–241CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hutchinson J. Wesley, Kamakura Wagner A., Lynch John G. Unobserved heterogeneity as an alternative explanation for “reversal” effects in behavioral research. J. Consumer Res. (2000) 27(3):324–344CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jain Dipak C., Vilcassim Naufel J. Investigating household purchase timing decisions: A conditional hazard function approach. Marketing Sci. (1991) 10(1):1–23LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kalnins Arturs. An empirical analysis of territorial encroachment with franchised and company-owned branded chains. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):476–489LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kamakura Wagner A., Russell Gary J. Probabilistic choice model for market segmentation and elasticity structure. J. Marketing Res. (1989) 26(4):379–390CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keuzenkamp Hugo A., Barten Anton P. Rejection without falsification—On the history of testing the homogeneity condition in the theory of consumer demand. J. Econometrics (1995) 67(1):103–127CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kleindorfer George B., O’Neill Liam, Ganeshan Ram. Validation in simulation: Various positions in the philosophy of science. Management Sci. (1998) 44(8):1087–1099LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kluge Arnold G. Philosophical conjectures and their refutation. Systematic Biol. (2001) 50(3):322–330CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lancaster Tony. Econometric methods for the duration of unemployment. Econometrica (1979) 47(4):939–956CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Little John D. C. Aggregate advertising models: The state of the art. Oper. Res. (1979) 27(4):629–667LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Liu Yunchuan, Zhang Z. John. The benefits of personalized pricing in a channel. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(1):97–105LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mahajan Vijay, Muller Eitan. Advertising pulsing policies for generating awareness for new products. Marketing Sci. (1986) 5(2):89–106LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Montgomery Alan L., Bradlow Eric T. Why analyst overconfidence about the functional form of demand models can lead to overpricing. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(4):569–583LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nickell Stephen. Estimating the probability of leaving unemployment. Econometrica (1979) 47(5):1249–1266CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nievergelt Yves. Total least squares: State-of-the-art regression in numerical analysis. SIAM Rev. (1994) 36(2):258–264CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pearl Judea. Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference (2000) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
  • Popkowski Leszczyc Peter T. L., Bass Frank M. Determining the effects of observed and unobserved heterogeneity on consumer brand choice. Appl. Stochastic Models Data Anal. (1998) 14(2):95–115CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Popper Karl R.Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge (1965) 2nd ed.(Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, UK) Google Scholar
  • Popper Karl R.The Logic of Scientific Discovery (1968) rev. ed.(Hutchinson, London, UK) Google Scholar
  • Popper Karl R.Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach (1972) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Redman Deborah A. Karl Popper’s theory of science and econometrics: The rise and decline of social engineering. J. Econom. Issues (1994) 28(1):67–99CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shugan Steven M. In search of data: An editorial. Marketing Sci. (2002) 21(4):369–377LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shugan Steven M. Editorial: Are consumers rational? Experimental evidence? Marketing Sci. (2005) 25(1):1–7LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stanley Tom D. Empirical economics? An econometric. J. Econom. Issues (1998) 32(1):191–218CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sun Baohong, Xie Jinhong, Cao H. Henry. Product strategy for innovators in markets with network effects. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(2):243–254LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Syam Niladri B., Ruan Ranran, Hess James D. Customized products: A competitive analysis. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(4):569–584LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Vakratsas Demetrios, Feinberg Fred M., Bass Frank M., Kalyanaram Gurumurthy. The shape of advertising response functions revisited: A model of dynamic probabilistic thresholds. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(1):109–119LinkGoogle Scholar
  • van Helden Albert. The telescope in the seventeenth century. Isis (1974) 65(1):38–58CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Huffel Sabine, Vanderwalle Joos. The Total Least Squares Problem: Computational Aspects and Analysis. Frontiers in Applied Mathematics (1991) Vol. 9(Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Nierop Erjen, Paap Richard, Bronnenberg Bart, Franses Philip Hans, Wedel Michel. Retrieving unobserved consideration sets from household panel data. (2005) . Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
  • Vaupel James W., Manton Kenneth G., Stallard Eric. The impact of heterogeneity in individual frailty on the dynamics of mortality demography. Demography (1979) 16(3):439–454CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Villas-Boas M. J. Predicting advertising pulsing policies in an oligopoly: A model and empirical test. Marketing Sci. (1993) 12(1):88–102LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weintraub E. Roy. How should we write the history of twentieth-century economics? Oxford Rev. Econom. Policy (1999) 15(4):139–152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wisan Winifred Lovell. Galileo and the process of scientific creation. Isis (1984) 75(2):269–286CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wu Dazhong, Ray Gautam, Geng Xianjun, Whinston Andrew. Implications of reduced search cost and free riding in e-commerce. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(2):255–262LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zellner Arnold. An Introduction to Bayesian Inference in Econometrics (1971) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Zoltners Andris A., Sinha Prabhakant. Sales territory design: Thirty years of modeling and implementation. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(3):313–331LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.