New Product Diffusion with Influentials and Imitators

References

• Bass Frank M. A new product growth model for consumer durables. Management Sci. (1969) 15:215–227Link, Google Scholar
• Beck Jonathan. The sales effect of word of mouth: A model for creative goods and estimates for novels. J. Cultural Econom. (2007) 31ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Becker Marshall H. Sociometric location and innovativeness: Reformulation and extension of the diffusion model. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1970) 35:267–283Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bemmaor Albert C., Laurent Gilles, Lilien Gary L., Pras Bernard. Modeling the diffusion of new durable goods: Word-of-mouth effect versus consumer heterogeneity. Research Traditions in Marketing (1994) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) 201–223Google Scholar
• Bemmaor Albert C., Lee Yanghyuk. The impact of heterogeneity and ill-conditioning on diffusion model parameter estimates. Marketing Sci. (2002) 21:209–220Link, Google Scholar
• Bourdieu Pierre.Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste (1984) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Bronnenberg Bart J., Mela Carl F. Market roll-out and retailer adoption for new brands. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23:500–518Link, Google Scholar
• Burt Ronald S. Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. Amer. J. Sociol. (1987) 92:1287–1335Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cancian Frank.The Innovator’s Situation: Upper-Middle-Class Conservatism in Agricultural Communities (1979) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) Google Scholar
• Case Anne C., Rosen Harvey S., Hines James R. Budget spillovers and fiscal policy interdependence. J. Public Econom. (1993) 52:285–307Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman James S.Introduction to Mathematical Sociology (1964) (The Free Press of Glencoe, London, UK) Google Scholar
• Coleman James S., Katz Elihu, Menzel Herbert. Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study (1966) (Bobbs-Merrill Company, Indianapolis, IN) Google Scholar
• Coulter Robin A., Feick Lawrence, Price Linda L. Changing faces: Cosmetics opinion leadership among women in the new Hungary. Eur. J. Marketing (2002) 36:1287–1308Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cox D. R. The analysis of exponentially distributed life-times with two types of failure. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B (1959) 21:411–421Google Scholar
• Daley D. J. Concerning the spread of news in a population of individuals who never forget. Bull. Math. Biophys. (1967) 29:373–376Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davidson Russell, MacKinnon James G.Estimation and Inference in Econometrics (1993) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Davies Stephen.The Diffusion of Process Innovations (1979) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• Dixon Robert. Hybrid corn revisited. Econometrica (1980) 46:1451–1461Crossref, Google Scholar
• Esteban-Bravo Mercedes, Lehmann Donald R. When giving some away makes sense to jump-start the diffusion process. Marketing Lett. (2006) 17:243–254Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fader Peter S., Hardie Bruce G. S., Lee Ka Lok. “Counting your customers” the easy way: An alternative to the Pareto/NBD model. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24:275–284Link, Google Scholar
• Farrell Winslow.How Hits Happen (1998) (HarperCollins, New York) Google Scholar
• Fornerino Marianela. Internet adoption in France. Services Indust. J. (2003) 23(1):119–135Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franses Philip Hans. Testing for residual autocorrelation in growth curve models. Tech. Forecasting Soc. Change (2002) 69:195–204Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frenzen Jonathan K., Nakamoto Kent. Structure, cooperation, and the flow of market information. J. Consumer Res. (1993) 20:360–375Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garber Tal, Goldenberg Jacob, Libai Barak, Muller Eitan. From density to destiny: Using spatial dimension of sales data for early prediction of new product success. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23:419–428Link, Google Scholar
• Gladwell Malcolm.The Tipping Point (2000) (Little, Brown and Company, New York) Google Scholar
• Godes David, Mayzlin Dina. Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23:545–560Link, Google Scholar
• Goldenberg Jacob, Libai Barak, Muller Eitan. Riding the saddle: How cross-market communications can create a major slump in sales. J. Marketing (2002) 66(2):1–16Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griliches Zvi. Profitability versus interaction: Another false dichotomy. Rural Sociology (1962) 27:327–330Google Scholar
• Hahn Minhi, Park Sehoon, Krishnamurthi Lakshman, Zoltners Andris A. Analysis of new product diffusion using a four-segment trial-repeat model. Marketing Sci. (1994) 13:224–247Link, Google Scholar
• Hardie Bruce G. S., Fader Peter S., Wisniewski Michael. An empirical comparison of new product trial forecasting models. J. Forecasting (1998) 17:209–229Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hernes Gudmund. Diffusion and growth—The non-homogenous case. Scand. J. Econom. (1976) 78:427–436Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homans George C.Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms (1961) (Harcourt, Brace, and World, New York) Google Scholar
• Jeuland Abel P. Parsimonious models of diffusion of innovation. Part A: Derivations and comparisons. (1981) . Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
• Karmeshu Debasree Goswami. Stochastic evolution of innovation diffusion in heterogeneous groups: Study of life cycle patterns. IMA J. Management Math. (2001) 12:107–126Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz Elihu. The two-step flow of communication: An up-to-date report on an hypothesis. Public Opinion Quart. (1957) 21:61–78Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz Elihu, Lazarsfeld Paul F.Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communication (1955) (The Free Press, Glencoe, IL) Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld Paul F., Berelson Bernard, Gaudet Hazel. The People’s Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign (1944) (Duell, Sloan and Pearce, New York) Google Scholar
• Lekvall Per, Wahlbin Clas. A study of some assumptions underlying innovation diffusion functions. Swedish J. Econom. (1973) 75:362–377Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lilien Gary L., Rao Ambar, Kalish Shlomo. Bayesian estimation and control of detailing effort in a repeat purchase diffusion environment. Management Sci. (1981) 27:493–506Link, Google Scholar
• Mahajan Vijay, Muller Eitan. When is it worthwhile targeting the majority instead of the innovators in a new product launch? J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35:488–495Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahajan Vijay, Peterson Robert A.Models for Innovation Adoption (1985) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
• Mahajan Vijay, Muller Eitan, Bass Frank M., Eliashberg J., Lilien G. L. New-product diffusion models. Marketing (Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, Vol. 5) (1993) (North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 349–408Google Scholar
• Mahajan Vijay, Muller Eitan, Srivastava Rajendra K. Determination of adopter categories by using innovation diffusion models. J. Marketing Res. (1990) 27:37–50Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manfredi Piero, Bonaccorsi Andrea, Secchi Angelo. Social heterogeneities in classical new product diffusion models. I: “External” and “internal” models. (1998) . Technical report 174, Dipartimento Statistica e Matematica Applicata all’Economia, Università di Pisa, Pisa, ItalyGoogle Scholar
• Mansfield Edwin. Technical change and the rate of imitation. Econometrica (1961) 29:741–766Crossref, Google Scholar
• Massy William F., Montgomery David B., Morrison Donald G.Stochastic Models of Buying Behavior (1970) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Merton Robert K., Lazarsfeld Paul F., Stanton Frank N. Patterns of influence: A study of interpersonal influence and communications behavior in a local community. Communications Research, 1948–1949 (1949) (Harper & Brothers, New York) 180–219Google Scholar
• Midgley David F., Dowling Grahame R. Innovativeness: The concept and its measurement. J. Consumer Res. (1978) 4:229–242Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moe Wendy W., Fader Peter S. Modeling hedonic portfolio products: A joint segmentation analysis of music compact disc sales. J. Marketing Res. (2001) 38:376–385Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moe Wendy W., Fader Peter S. Using advance purchase orders to forecast new product sales. Marketing Sci. (2002) 21:347–364Link, Google Scholar
• Moore Geoffrey A.Crossing the Chasm (1991) (HarperBusiness, New York) Google Scholar
• Moore Geoffrey A.Inside the Tornado (1995) (HarperBusiness, New York) Google Scholar
• Myers James H., Robertson Thomas S. Dimensions of opinion leadership. J. Marketing Res. (1972) 9:41–46Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narayanan Sunder. Incorporating heterogeneous adoption rates in new product diffusion models: A model and empirical investigations. Marketing Lett. (1992) 3:395–406Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perrin Meyer. Bi-logistic growth. Tech. Forecasting Soc. Change (1994) 47 :89–102Crossref, Google Scholar
• Philips Damon J., Zuckerman Ezra W. Middle-status conformity: Theoretical restatement and empirical demonstration in two markets. Amer. J. Sociol. (2001) 107:379–429Crossref, Google Scholar
• Putsis William P., Balasubramaniam Sridhar, Kaplan Edward H., Sen Subrata K. Mixing behavior in cross-country diffusion. Marketing Sci. (1997) 16:354–369Link, Google Scholar
• Pyatt F. Graham. Priority Patterns and the Demand for Household Durable Goods (1964) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• Raftery Adrian E., Marsden Peter V. Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology 1995 (1995) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) 111–163Google Scholar
• Riesman David.The Lonely Crowd: A Study of the Changing American Character (1950) (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT) Google Scholar
• Rogers Everett M.Diffusion of Innovations (2003) 5th ed.(Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Rosen Emanuel.The Anatomy of Buzz (2000) (Doubleday, New York) Google Scholar
• Schor Juliet B.The Overspent American: Upscaling, Downshifting, and the New Consumer (1998) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Seber G. A. F., Wild C. J.Nonlinear Regression (1989) (John Wiley, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Silk Alvin J. Overlap among self-designated opinion leaders: A study of selected dental products and services. J. Marketing Res. (1966) 3:255–259Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simmel Georg., Levine Donald N. Fashion. Georg Simmel on Individuality and Social Forms (1971) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) 294–323Google Scholar
• Slywotzky Adrian J., Shapiro Benson P. Leveraging to beat the odds: The new marketing mind-set. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1993) 71(5):97–107Google Scholar
• Srinivasan V., Mason Charlotte H. Nonlinear least squares estimation of new product diffusion models. Marketing Sci. (1986) 5:169–178Link, Google Scholar
• Steffens P. R., Murthy D. N. P. A mathematical model for new product diffusion: The influence of innovators and imitators. Math. Comput. Model. (1992) 16(4):11–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taga Yasushi, Isii Keiiti. On a stochastic model concerning the pattern of communication: Diffusion of news in a social group. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. (1959) 11:25–43Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tanny S. M., Derzko N. A. Innovators and imitators in innovation diffusion modeling. J. Forecasting (1988) 7:225–234Crossref, Google Scholar
• Valente Thomas W., Hoffman Beth R., Ritt-Olson Annamara, Lichtman Kara, Johnson C. Anderson. Effects of a social-network method for group assignment strategies on peer-led tobacco prevention programs in schools. Amer. J. Public Health (2003) 93:1837–1843Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte Christophe, Lilien Gary L. Bias and systematic change in the parameter estimates of macro-level diffusion models. Marketing Sci. (1997) 16:338–353Link, Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte Christophe, Lilien Gary L. Medical Innovation revisited: Social contagion versus marketing effort. Amer. J. Sociol. (2001) 106:1409–1435Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte Christophe, Lilien Gary L. Two-stage partial observability models of innovation adoption. (2003) . Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
• Van den Bulte Christophe, Stremersch Stefan. Social contagion and income heterogeneity in new product diffusion: A meta-analytic test. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23:530–544Link, Google Scholar
• Venkatesan Rajkumar, Krishnan Trichy V., Kumar V. Evolutionary estimation of macro-level diffusion models using genetic algorithms: An alternative to nonlinear least squares. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23:451–464Link, Google Scholar
• Weimann Gabriel.The Influentials: People Who Influence People (1994) (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY) Google Scholar
• Williams Ross A. Growth in ownership of consumer durables in the United Kingdom. Economica (New Series) (1972) 39:60–69Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yamada Masataka, Kato Hiroshi. A structural analysis of sales patterns of music CDs. (2002) . Presentation at the 2002 INFORMS Marketing Science Conference, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, June 27–30Google Scholar