A Reply to “A Comment on ‘Is Having More Channels Really Better? A Model of Competition Among Commercial Television Broadcasters’ ”
Published Online:1 Sep 2006https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1060.0233
References
- Predicting competitive response to a major policy challenge: Combining game-theoretic and empirical analyses. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(1):12–24Link, Google Scholar
- Modeling movie life cycles and market share. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(3):508–517Link, Google Scholar
- Television and Its Audience (1988) (Sage, London, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
- Retail location theory: The legacy of Harold Hotelling. J. Retailing (1989) 65(Fall):450–470Google Scholar
- Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction (2003) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
- A comment on “Is having more channels really better? A model of competition among commercial television broadcasters”. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(5):541–545Link, Google Scholar
- Free entry in one dimensional models: Pure profits and multiple equilibria. J. Regional Sci. (1976) 16:21–33Crossref, Google Scholar
- The principle of minimum differentiation reconsidered: Some new developments in the theory of spatial competition. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1975) 42:27–49Crossref, Google Scholar
- Freedom of entry and the existence of pure profit. Econom. J. (1978) 88:455–469Google Scholar
- Spatial competition in the network television industry. Rand J. Econom. (2001) 32(4):624–656Crossref, Google Scholar
- Competitive price and positioning strategies. Marketing Sci. (1988) 7(1):76–91Link, Google Scholar
- The impact of altruism and envy on competitive behavior and satisfaction. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2001) 18:5–17Crossref, Google Scholar
- Network prime-time programming strategies in the 1980s. J. Broadcasting Electr. Media (1995) 39(Fall):482–495Crossref, Google Scholar
- The television networks, competition and program diversity. J. Broadcasting (1979) 23(4):393–409Crossref, Google Scholar
- Is having more channels really better? A model of competition among commercial television broadcasters. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(1):120–133Link, Google Scholar
- An industry equilibrium analysis of downstream vertical integration. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2:161–192Link, Google Scholar
- Undercut-proof equilibria. (2000) . Working paper. University of Haifa, Haifa, IsraelGoogle Scholar
- Equilibrium in simple spatial (or differentiated product) models. J. Econom. Theory (1980) 22:313–326Crossref, Google Scholar
- Television Economics (1974) (D. C. Heath, Lexington, MA) Google Scholar
- Oligopoly and consistent conjectural variations. Bell J. Econom. (1982) 13(1):197–205Crossref, Google Scholar
- Viewer preference segmentation and viewing choice models for network television. J. Advertising (1992) 21(1):1–18Crossref, Google Scholar
- Monopolistic competition with outside goods. Bell J. Econom. (1979) 10(1):141–156Crossref, Google Scholar
- Market Structure and Behavior (1980) (Harvard University Press, Boston, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
- Editorial: Marketing and designing transaction games. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(4):525–530Link, Google Scholar
- A theory of oligopoly. J. Political Econom. (1964) 72(1):44–61Crossref, Google Scholar
- . TV’s identity crisis. US News & World Report (1996) Aug. 26):37Google Scholar
- Counterprogramming primetime network television. J. Broadcasting & Electron. Media (1987) 31(1):41–55Crossref, Google Scholar
- Multiproduct firms in the representative consumer model of product differentiation. J. Math. Econom. (1993) 22:149–160Crossref, Google Scholar
- The choice of commercial breaks in television programmes: The number, length and timing. J. Indust. Econom. (2004) 52(3):315–326Crossref, Google Scholar

