Editorial: Who Is Afraid to Give Freedom of Speech to Marketing Folks?

References

• Akçura M. Tolga, Gönül Füsun F., Petrova Elina. Consumer learning and brand valuation: An application on over-the-counter drugs. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(1):156–169Link, Google Scholar
• Anast David G. FDA may bring relief for OC biomed firms. Orange County Bus. J. (1995) 18(38, sec. 1):23Google Scholar
• Barron James. Media executives hesitant to run explicit aids ads. New York Times (1987) Late ed.(May 12):B.3Google Scholar
• Bass Frank M., Krishnamoorthy Anand, Prasad Ashutosh, Sethi Suresh P. Generic and brand advertising strategies in a dynamic duopoly. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(4):556–568Link, Google Scholar
• Becker Gary S., Murphy Kevin M. A simple theory of advertising as a good or bad. Quart. J. Econom. (1993) 108(4):941–964Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergen Mark, Dutta Shantanu, Shugan Steven M. Branded variants: A retail perspective. J. Marketing Res. (1996) 33(1):9–19Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger Peter L. The market, morals and manners. Wall Street J. (1988) Jul. 14):1Google Scholar
• Bock Linda. Knott loses court ruling; Riverdale Mills owner to appeal. Telegram Gazette (2004) Nov. 2):E-1Google Scholar
• Boedecker Karl A., Morgan Fred W., Wright Linda Berns. The evolution of First Amendment protection for commercial speech. J. Marketing (1995) 59(1):38–47Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bush George W. Securing democracy. Vital Speeches Day (2005) 71(15):450–454Google Scholar
• Caretto Matt. Selective enforcement of the immigration laws: Is there any possible external constraint on the exercise of prosecutorial discretion? The Georgetown J. Legal Ethics (2005) 18(3):639–650Google Scholar
• Chamlin Mitchell B., Cochran John K. Race riots and robbery arrests: Toward a direct test of the threat hypothesis. Soc. Pathology (2000) 6(2):83–101Google Scholar
• Chen Yubo, Xie Jinhong. Third-party product review and firm marketing strategy. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(2):218–240Link, Google Scholar
• Christian Patrick. The great ad turn-on? Telecomm. Internat. (2006) 40(6):50–51Google Scholar
• Chu Wujin, Gerstner Eitan, Hess James D. Costs and benefits of hard-sell. J. Marketing Res. (1995) 32(1):97–102Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clinton William J. A bridge to the future. Vital Speeches Day (1996) 62(23):706–712Google Scholar
• Crawford Charles. Race and pretextual stops: Noise enforcement in Midwest City. Soc. Pathology (2000) 6(3):213–227Google Scholar
• Dubé Jean-Pierre, Manchanda Puneet. Differences in dynamic brand competition across markets: An empirical analysis. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(1):81–95Link, Google Scholar
• Eliashberg Jehoshua, Shugan Steven. Film critics: Influencers or predictors? J. Marketing (1997) 61(April):68–78Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elsner Ralf, Krafft Manfred, Huchzermeier Arnd. Optimizing rhenania’s direct marketing business through dynamic multilevel modeling in multicatalog-brand environment. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(2):192–206Link, Google Scholar
• Erickson Patricia G. A persistent paradox: Drug law and policy in Canada. Canadian J. Criminology (1999) 41(2):275–284Google Scholar
• Evgeniou Theodoros, Boussios Constantinos, Zacharia Giorgos. Generalized robust conjoint estimation. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(3):415–429Link, Google Scholar
• Feary Vaughana Macy. Taking the right of freedom of commercial communication seriously. J. Bus. Ethics (1992) 11(1):47–59Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman Milton, Friedman Rose. Free to Choose: A Personal Statement (1980) (Harcourt, Brace and World of New York, New York) Google Scholar
• Galloway Chester S. Misplaced marketing: Misplaced fears of off label prescription drug marketing. J. Consumer Marketing (2003) 20(6):513–515Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glantz Craig M. “Could” this be the end of Fourth Amendment protections for motorists? J. Criminal Law Criminology (1997) 87(3):864–894Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godes David, Mayzlin Dina. Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):545–560Link, Google Scholar
• Gore Albert Arnold. Restoring the rule of law. Vital Speeches Day (2006) 72(7):199–207Google Scholar
• Gorney Carole. One “strike suit” and you’re out. Public Relations Quart. (2003) 48(3):36–38Google Scholar
• Graham-Walker Ann. Foreign MDs are “so off the island”: Licensing red tape a deterrent for foreign doctors. Medical Post (2001) 37(2):1Google Scholar
• Grant James. First-class fiasco. Barron’s Nat. Bus. Financial Weekly (1976) 56(29):7Google Scholar
• Greenhouse Linda. Free speech for companies on justices’ agenda. New York Times (2003) Late ed.(Apr. 20):A.17Google Scholar
• Greenspan Alan. Market capitalism: The role of free markets. Vital Speeches Day (1998) 64(14):418–421Google Scholar
• Haman John. Polling without pressure. Arkansas Bus. (1994) 11(2, sec. 1):17Google Scholar
• Hanke Steve H., Walters Stephen J. K. Economic freedom, properity, and equality: A survey. Cato J. (1997) 17(2):117–146Google Scholar
• Hauser John R. Marketing makes a difference. Marketing Management (2002) 11(1):46–47Google Scholar
• Hauser John R., Klein Robert L. Without good research quality is shot in dark. Marketing News (1988) 22(1):1–2Google Scholar
• Hauser John R., Toubia Olivier. The impact of utility balance and endogeneity in conjoint analysis. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(3):498–507Link, Google Scholar
• Iyer Ganesh, Soberman David, Villas-Boas J. Miguel. The targeting of advertising. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(3):461–476Link, Google Scholar
• Kozinski Alex, Banner Stuart. Who’s afraid of commercial speech? Virginia Law Rev. (1990) 76(4):627–653Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuhne Cecil C. Testing the outer limits of commercial speech: Its First Amendment implications. Rev. Litigation (2004) 23(3):607–627Google Scholar
• LaFave Wayne R. The “routine traffic stop” from start to finish: Too much “routine,” not enough fourth amendment. Michigan Law Rev. (2004) 102(8):1843–1905Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lasky Michael C. Gag order. Adweek (2002) 43Eastern ed.(25):12Google Scholar
• Liechty John C., Fong Duncan K. H., DeSarbo Wayne S. Dynamic models incorporating individual heterogeneity: Utility evolution in conjoint analysis. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(2):285–293Link, Google Scholar
• McAllister Bill. Must it get there overnight? Agencies improperly bypassing postal service, inspectors report. The Washington Post (1994) Jan. 12):a.17Google Scholar
• Middleton Kent R. Advocacy advertising, the first amendment, and competitive advantage: A comment on Cutler & Muehling. J. Advertising (1991) 20(2):77–81Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milewicz John, Herbig Paul. Evaluating the brand extension decision using a model of reputation building. J. Product Brand Management (1994) 3(1):39–47Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller John W. Europe’s “outdated” job rules; Some say certification requirements hinder EU productivity. Wall Street J. (2004) Aug. 16):A.11Google Scholar
• Miller Yawu. MBTA officials target “rogue cops,” critics question policies. Bay State Banner (2001) 36(35):1Google Scholar
• Mittal Vikas, Anderson Eugene W., Sayrak Akin, Tadikamalla Pandu. Dual emphasis and the long-term financial impact of customer satisfaction. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(4):544–555Link, Google Scholar
• Mizuno Takeya. Government suppression of the Japanese language in World War II assembly camps. Journalism Mass Comm. Quart. (2003) 80(4):849–865Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montgomery David B., Peters Anne H., Weinberg Charles B. The freedom of information act: Strategic opportunities and threats. Sloan Management Rev. (1978) 19(2):1–12Google Scholar
• Moorman Christine, Rust Roland T. The role of marketing. J. Marketing (1999) 63(Special Issue):180–197Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moorman Christine, Du Rex, Mela Carl F. The effect of standardized information on firm survival and marketing strategies. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(2):263–274Link, Google Scholar
• Moran Tim. Vintners’ label tiff goes to California Supreme Court. Knight Ridder Tribune Bus. News (2003) Apr. 19):1Google Scholar
• Moscou Jim. A real mixed bag. Editor Publisher (1999) 132(36):9Google Scholar
• Muskal Michael. U.S. high court refuses wine case. Los Angeles Times (2006) Jan. 24):C.6Google Scholar
• Napoli Philip M. The marketplace of ideas metaphor in communications regulation. J. Comm. (1999) 49(4):151–169Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nuechterlein James. The First Amendment and democracy. Public Interest (1997) 126(Winter):119–123Google Scholar
• Petty Ross D. Advertising and the first amendment: A practical test for distinguishing commercial speech from fully protected speech. J. Public Policy Marketing (1993) 12(2):170–177Crossref, Google Scholar
• Posch Robert. Attempts to censor speech through tariffs are neither legal nor logical. Direct Marketing (1996) 58(11):74–76Google Scholar
• Reed Lee. Is commercial speech really less valuable than political speech? On replacing values and categories in First Amendment jurisprudence. Amer. Bus. Law J. (1996) 34(1):1–34Crossref, Google Scholar
• Richards J. I., Preston Ivan L. Proving and disproving materiality of deceptive advertising claims. J. Public Policy Marketing (1992) 11(2):45–56Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rust Roland T., Verhoef Peter C. Optimizing the marketing interventions mix in intermediate-term CRM. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(3):477–489Link, Google Scholar
• Shugan Steven M. Branded variants. Research in Marketing. AMA Educators’ Proc. Ser. #55 (1989) American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL:33–38Google Scholar
• Shugan Steven M. Brand loyalty programs: Are they shams? Marketing Sci. (2005a) 24(2):185–193Link, Google Scholar
• Shugan Steven M. Marketing and designing transaction games. Marketing Sci. (2005b) 24(4):525–530Link, Google Scholar
• Smith Alan D. Controversial and emerging issues associated with cybergambling (e-casinos). Online Inform. Rev. (2004) 28(6):435–443Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snyder Lloyd B. Is attorney-client confidentiality necessary? The Georgetown J. Legal Ethics (2002) 15(3):477–525Google Scholar
• Sowell Thomas. A conflict of visions: Ideological origins of political struggles. (1987) (William Morrow, New York) Google Scholar
• Stidsen Bent, Schutte Thomas F. Marketing as a communication system: The marketing concept revisited. J. Marketing (1972) 36(4):22–27Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stone Brad. Those annoying ads that won’t go away. Newsweek (2002) 140(16):J38Google Scholar
• Stremersch Stefan, Verhoef Peter C. Globalization of authorship in the marketing discipline: Does it help or hinder the field? Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(4):585–594Link, Google Scholar
• Tushnet Mark. New meaning for First Amendment. ABA J. (1995) 81(Nov.):56–58Google Scholar
• Tylee John. Car ads annoy over-50-market, survey says. Campaign Teddington (2003) Jan. 24):4Google Scholar
• Watson Jamal E. Fields campaign says police favor Bloomberg’s posters. New York Amsterdam News (2005) 96(34):6Google Scholar
• Webster Richard A. Second permit sweep less chilling for biz owners in French Quarter. New Orleans City Bus. (2004) Aug. 2):1Google Scholar
• Weinstein Henry. Cochran’s libel suit against columnist rejected: Federal judge rules that a New York writer’s criticism of the former Simpson lawyer is opinion protected by the First Amendment. Los Angeles Times (1998) Home ed.(Aug. 4):3Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt Birger. Efficient marketing communication: Helping the customer learn. J. Marketing Res. (1996) 33(2):239–246Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zielinski Dave. The speech trap. Presentations (2005) 19(8):20–24Google Scholar