Commentary—Antibusiness Movies and Folk Marketing

References

• Ainslie Andrew, Drèze Xavier, Zufryden Fred. Modeling movie life cycles and market share. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(3):508–517Link, Google Scholar
• Arsenault Raymond. Wall Street (1987): The stockbroker’s son and the decade of greed. Film Hist. (1998) 28(1–2):1–2Google Scholar
• Bauer Raymond A., Greyser Stephen A.Advertising in America: The Consumer View (1968) (Harvard University Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Bayles Martha. TV: Big bad businessmen. Wall Street Journal (1987) Eastern Edition, March 23):A.20Google Scholar
• Berry Waldron. Overcoming public distrust of business. Bus. Forum (1984) 9(1):15–19Google Scholar
• Billingsley Lloyd. Writers guild in need of revision. Wall Street Journal (1987) Eastern Edition, January 12):A.24Google Scholar
• Eliashberg Jehoshua, Elberse Anita, Leenders Mark. The motion picture industry: Critical issues in practice, current research and new research directions. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(6):638–661Link, Google Scholar
• Fumento Michael. Why Hollywood hates business: Executives are usually heavies, rarely heroes. Investor’s Bus. Daily (1992) January 3Google Scholar
• Gilchrist Jim. Sinking the myths. The Scotsman (2002) April 8):9Google Scholar
• Godes David, Mayzlin Dina. Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):545–560Link, Google Scholar
• Goldwyn Samuel. On hollow praise: Producer warns against ads that mislead. New York Times (1951) April 1):100Google Scholar
• Gomes Lee. Too-clever ad against Digital yanked by H-P. Wall Street Journal (1998) Eastern Edition, February 17):B.1Google Scholar
• Hennig-Thurau Thorsten, Houston Mark B., Sridhar Shrihari. Can good marketing carry a bad product? Evidence from the motion picture industry. Marketing Lett.17(3):205–219Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hustad Thomas P., Pessemier Edgar A. Will the real consumer activist please stand up: An examination of consumers’ opinions about marketing practices. J. Marketing Res. (1973) 10(3):319–324Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ives Nat. The U.S. plans to see if there is misleading marketing of movies. New York Times (2003) Late Edition, East Coast, January 14):C.12Google Scholar
• Kehr Dave. Seeing business through Hollywood’s lens. New York Times (2002) Late Edition, East Coast, July 14, Section 4):5Google Scholar
• Krider Robert E., Li Tieshan, Liu Yong, Weinberg Charles B. The lead-lag puzzle of demand and distribution: A graphical method applied to movies. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(4):635–645Link, Google Scholar
• Lichter S. Robert, Lichter Linda S., Amundson Daniel. Does Hollywood hate business or money? J. Comm. (1997) 47(1):68–84Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lippman John. Warner Brothers hopes shift in ads can give lift to “The Postman”. Wall Street Journal (1997) Eastern Edition, December 24):1Google Scholar
• Lyman Rick, Elliott Stuart. Sony admits it used employees as bogus fans. New York Times (2001) Late Edition, East Coast, June 16):B.11Google Scholar
• Medved Michael. In the fray: My “Million Dollar” answer. Wall Street Journal (2005) Eastern Edition, February 17):D.8Google Scholar
• Morris John, Pollard Arthur. Mid-late twentieth century: “An Unprecedented Moral Quagmire”. The Representation of Business in English Literature (2000) (The Institute of Economic Affairs, London, UK) Google Scholar
• Moul Charles C., Shugan Steven M. Theatrical release and the launching of motion pictures in a concise handbook of movie industry economics. (2005) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Price Stuart. Television: The sinking of a myth. London Independent (2002) Sunday Edition, April 14):43Google Scholar
• Radas Sonja, Shugan Steven M. Seasonal marketing and timing new product introductions. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35(3):296–315Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rainer Peter. “Break-Up” should have been dumped. Christian Science Monitor (2006) June 2):12–15Google Scholar
• Ribstein Larry E. Wall Street and Vine: Hollywood’s view of business. (2005) . Working Paper LE05-010, University of Illinois Law and EconomicsGoogle Scholar
• Ross Chuck. ABC withholds ad info on controversial shows. Advertising Age (1997) 68(39):1–2Google Scholar
• Ross Chuck. GM’s Guarascio galled by uninformed ad buys. Advertising Age (1998) 69(7):6Google Scholar
• Rubin Paul H. Folk economics. Southern Econom. J. (2003) 70(1):157–171Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubin Paul H. Oil prices and folk economics. Regulation (2006) 29(2):8–9Google Scholar
• Sanderson Alan. Titanic injustice. London Independent (1998) February 26):18Google Scholar
• Seligman Dan. Tom Cruise versus corporate evil. Forbes (2000) September 4):P.082Google Scholar
• Senter Al, Overell Stephen. Straying out of character. Director (2001) 55(4):50–53Google Scholar
• Serwer Andy. Does Hollywood really get big business? Fortune (2004) 150(4):45Google Scholar
• Shermer Michael. Folk Science. Sci. Amer. (2006) 295(2):34Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonoff Jeffrey S. Logistic regression, categorical predictors, and goodness-of-fit: It depends on who you ask. Amer. Statistician (1998) 52(1):10–14Google Scholar
• Stein Benjamin J.The View from Sunset Boulevard: America as Brought to You by the People Who Make Television (1979) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Stein Benjamin J. How to fix Hollywood. Amer. Enterprise (1997) 8(5):72–73Google Scholar
• Sun Baohong, Xie Jinhong, Cao H. Henry. Product strategy for innovators in markets with network effects. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(2):243–254Link, Google Scholar
• Theberge Leonard J.Crooks, Conmen and Clowns: Business Men in TV Entertainment (1981) (Media Institute, Washington, D.C.) Google Scholar
• Thomas Sari, LeShay Steven V. Bad business? A reexamination of television’s portrayal of businesspersons. J. Comm. (1992) 42(1):95–105Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tyagi Rajeev K. Technological advances, transaction costs, and consumer welfare. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(3):335–344Link, Google Scholar
• van Munching Philip. The Devil’s adman. Brandweek (2001) 42(27):26Google Scholar