Zero as a Special Price: The True Value of Free Products

References

• Allenby G. M., Rossi P. E. Quality perceptions and asymmetric switching between brands. Marketing Sci. (1991) 10(3):185–204Link, Google Scholar
• Ariely D., Prelec D. Arbitrariness in the construction of value: Utility or mapping. (2006) . Working paper, MIT, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
• Ariely D., Gneezy U., Haruvy E. Social norms and the price of zero. (2006) . Working paper, MIT, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
• Ariely D., Loewenstein G., Prelec D. Coherent arbitrariness: Stable demand curves without stable preferences. Quart. J. Econom. (2003) 118(1):73–105Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ariely D., Loewenstein G., Prelec D. Tom Sawyer and the construction of value. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2006) 60:1–10Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bem D. J. An experimental analysis of self-persuasion. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1965) 1(3):199–218Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benartzi S., Thaler R. H. How much is investor autonomy worth? J. Finance (2002) 57(4):1593–1616Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chapman G. B., Johnson E. J. Anchoring, activation, and the construction of values. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1999) 79:115–153Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deci E. L., Ryan R. M. The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. J. Res. Personality (1985) 19(2):109–134Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diederich A. Decision making under conflict: Decision time as a measure of conflict strength. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. (2003) 10(1):167–175Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dholakia U. M., Simonson I. The effect of explicit reference points on consumer choice and online bidding behavior. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(2):206–217Link, Google Scholar
• Festinger L., Carlsmith J. M. Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. (1959) 58:203–210Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finucane M. L., Alhakami A., Slovic P., Johnson S. M. The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. J. Behavioral Decision Making (2000) 13(1):1–17Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiske A. P. The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psych. Rev. (1992) 99:689–723Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U., Rustichini A. A fine is a price. J. Legal Stud. (2000a) 29(1):1–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U., Rustichini A. Pay enough or don't pay at all. Quart. J. Econom. (2000b) 15(3):791–810Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gourville J. T., Soman D. Overchoice and assortment type: When and why variety backfires. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(3):382–395Link, Google Scholar
• Heyman J., Ariely D. Effort for payment: A tale of two markets. Psych. Sci. (2004) 15(11):787–793Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsee C. K., Yu F., Zhang J., Zhang Y. Medium maximization. J. Consumer Res. (2003) 30(1):1–14Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber J., Payne J. W., Puto C. Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: Violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. J. Consumer Res. (1982) 9(1):90–98Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyengar S. S., Lepper M. R. When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2000) 79(6):995–1006Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) XVLII:263–291Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leclerc F., Hsee C. K., Nunes J. C. Narrow focusing: Why the relative position of a good in its category matters more than it should. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(2):194–205Link, Google Scholar
• Lepper M. R., Greene D., Nisbett R. E. Undermining children's intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the “overjustification” hypothesis. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1973) 28(1):129–137Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luce M. F. Choosing to avoid: Coping with negatively emotion-laden consumer decisions. J. Consumer Res. (1998) 24(4):409–433Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGraw A. P., Tetlock P. E. Taboo trade-offs, relational framing and the acceptability of exchanges. J. Consumer Psych. (2005) 15:2–15Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGraw A. P., Tetlock P. E., Kristel O. V. The limits of fungibility: Relational schemata and the value of things. J. Consumer Res. (2003) 30:219–229Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nunes J. C., Park C. W. Incommensurate resources: Not just more of the same. J. Marketing Res. (2003) 40(4):26–38Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prelec D., Loewenstein G. The red and the black: Mental accounting of savings and debt. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(1):4–28Link, Google Scholar
• Schwarz N., Gilovich T. Feelings as information: Mood influences judgments and processing strategies. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (2002) (Cambridge University Press, New York) 534–548Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seife C.Zero, the Biography of a Dangerous Idea (2000) (Penguin Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Simonsohn U., Lowenstein G. Mistake #37: The effect of previously faced prices on current housing demand. Econom. J. (2006) 116(1):175–199Google Scholar
• Simonson I., Carmon Z., O'Curry S. Experimental evidence on the negative effect of product features & sales promotions on brand choice. Marketing Sci. (1994) 13:23–40Link, Google Scholar
• Slovic P., Finucane M., Peters E., MacGregor D. G., Gilovich T. The affect heuristic. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (2002) (Cambridge University Press, New York) 397–420Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science (1974) 185:1124–1131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Shafir E. Choice under conflict: The dynamics of deferred decision. Psych. Sci. (1992) 3(6):358–361Crossref, Google Scholar