Research Note—A Theoretical Investigation of the Effects of Similarity on Brand Choice Using the Elimination-by-Tree Model

References

• Allenby G. M., Ginter J. L. The effects of in-store displays and feature advertising on consideration sets. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1995) 12:67–80Crossref, Google Scholar
• Batsell R. R., Polking J. C. A new class of market share models. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4(Summer):177–198Link, Google Scholar
• Bhat C. R. A heteroscedastic extreme value model of intercity travel mode choice. Transportation Res. (1995) 29(6):471–483Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter G. S., Nakamoto K. Consumer preference formation and pioneering advantage. J. Marketing Res. (1989) 26(August):285–298Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chernev A. The effect of common features on brand choice: moderating role of attribute importance. J. Consumer Res. (1997) 23(4):304–311Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cui D., Curry D. Prediction in marketing using the support vector machine. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(4, Fall):595–615Link, Google Scholar
• Currim I. S. Predictive testing of consumer choice models not subject to independent of irrelevant alternatives. J. Marketing Res. (1982) 19(May):208–222Crossref, Google Scholar
• Debreu G. Review of R. D. Luce, individual choice behavior: a theoretical analysis. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1960) 50:186–188Google Scholar
• Dhar R. Consumer preference for a no-choice option. J. Consumer Res. (1997) 24(September):215–231Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dhar R., Simonson I. The effect of forced choice on choice. J. Marketing Res. (2003) 40(2):146–161Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dholakia U. M., Simonson I. The effect of explicit reference points on consumer choice and online bidding behavior. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(2, Spring):206–217Link, Google Scholar
• Domencich T., McFadden D.Urban Travel Demand: a Behavioral Analysis (1975) (North Holland, Amsterdam) Google Scholar
• Glazer R., Kahn B., Moore W. L. The influence of external constraints on brand choice: the lone-alternative effect. J. Consumer Res. (1991) 18(June):119–127Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gourville J. T., Soman D. Overchoice and assortment type: when and why variety backfires. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(3):382–395Link, Google Scholar
• Hsee C. K., Leclerc F. Will product look more attractive when presented separately or together. J. Consumer Res. (1998) 25(September):175–186Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber J., Sewall M. A. Covariance bias of Thurstone V Scaling as applied to consumer preferences and purchase intentions. Advances in Consumer Research (1978) VI(Association for Consumer Research, Chicago, IL) 578–581Google Scholar
• Huber J., Payne J. W., Puto C. Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: violation of regularity and similarity hypothesis. J. Consumer Res. (1982) 9(June):90–98Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahn B., Moore W. L., Glazer R. Experiments in constrained choice. J. Consumer Res. (1987) 14(June):96–114Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47(March):263–291Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leclerc F., Hsee C., Nunes J. C. Narrow focusing: why the relative position of a good in its category matters more than it should. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(2):194–205Link, Google Scholar
• Luce R. D.Individual Choice Behavior: a Theoretical Analysis (1959) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• MacCrimmon K. R., Cochrane J. L., Zeleny M. An overview of multiple objective decision making. Multiple Criteria Decision Making (1973) (University of South Carolina Press, Columbia) Google Scholar
• McFadden D., Zarembka P. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Frontiers in Econometrics Applications (1973) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• McFadden D., Karlgvist A., et al.Modeling the Choice of Residential Location in Spatial Interaction Theory and Residential Location (1978) (North Holland, Amsterdam) 75–96Google Scholar
• Simonson I. Choice based on reasons: the case of attraction and compromise effects. J. Consumer Res. (1989) 16(2):158–174Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A. Elimination by aspects: a theory of choice. Psych. Rev. (1972) 79(4):281–299Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A. Features of similarity. Psych. Rev. (1977) 84(4, July):327–352Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Russo J. Substitutability and similarity in binary choice. J. Math. Psych. (1969) 6:1–12Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Sattath S. Preference trees. Psych. Rev. (1979) 86(6):542–573Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Simonson I. Context-dependent preferences. Management Sci. (1993) 39(10):1179–1189Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang J. An integrated choice model incorporating alternative mechanisms for consumers' reactions to in-store display and feature advertising. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(3):278–290Link, Google Scholar