Mean-Centering Does Not Alleviate Collinearity Problems in Moderated Multiple Regression Models

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1060.0263

References

  • Aiken L. S., West S. G.Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (1991) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
  • Belsley D. A. Demeaning conditioning diagnostics through centering. Amer. Statistician (1984) 38(2):73–77Google Scholar
  • Belsley D. A.Conditioning Diagnostics: Collinearity and Weak Data in Regression (1991) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Bottomley P., Holden S. Do we really know how consumers evaluate brand extensions? Empirical generalizations based on secondary analysis of eight studies. J. Marketing Res. (2001) 38(4):494–500CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coenders G., Saez M., Ferligoj A., Mrvar A. Collinearity, heteroscedasticity and outlier diagnostics in regression. Do they always offer what they claim? New Approaches in Applied Statistics, Metodološki Zvezki (2000) 16(Faculty of Social Sciences, Ljubljana, Slovenia) 79–94Google Scholar
  • Cohen J., Cohen P.Applied Multiple Regression: Correlation Analysis for Behavioral Sciences (1983) 2nd ed.(Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Cronbach L. J. Statistical tests for moderator variables: flaws in analyses recently proposed. Psych. Bull. (1987) 102(3):414–417CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Echambadi R., Arroniz I., Reinartz W., Lee J. Empirical generalizations from brand extension research: how sure are we? Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2006) 23(3):253–261CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grewal R., Cote J. A., Baumgartner H. Multicollinearity and measurement error in structural equation models: implications for theory testing. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):519–529LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Irwin J. R., McClelland G. H. Misleading heuristics and moderated multiple regression models. J. Marketing Res. (2001) 38(1):100–109CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jaccard J. R., Turrisi R., Wan C. K.Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression (1990) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
  • Judge G. G., Griffiths W. E., Hill R. C., Lutkepohl H., Lee T.-C.Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Econometrics (1988) 2nd ed.(John Wiley & Sons, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kam C. D., Franzese R. J.Modeling and Interpreting Interactive Hypotheses in Regression Analysis: A Refresher and Some Practical Advice (2005) (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI) Google Scholar
  • Kopalle P. K., Lehmann D. R. Setting quality expectations when entering a market: what should the promise be? Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(1):8–24LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kromrey J. D., Foster-Johnson L. Mean centering in moderated multiple regression: much ado about nothing. Ed. Psych. Measurement (1998) 58(1):42–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lance C. E. Residual centering, exploratory and confirmatory moderator analysis, and decomposition of effects in path models containing interactions. Appl. Psych. Measurement (1988) 12(June):163–175CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McCullough B. D. Assessing the reliability of statistical software: Part II. Amer. Statistician (1999) 53(2):149–159Google Scholar
  • Morris J. H., Sherman J. D., Mansfield E. R. Failures to detect moderating effects with ordinary least squares-moderated multiple regression: some reasons and a remedy. Psych. Bull. (1986) 99:282–288CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sharma S., Durand R. M., Gur-Arie O. Identification and analysis of moderator variables. J. Marketing Res. (1981) 18(3):291–300CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Woolridge J. M.Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (2001) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.