Adaptive Idea Screening Using Consumers

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1070.0273

References

  • Bäck T., Schutz M. Intelligent mutation rate control in canonical genetic algorithms. Proc. Internat. Sympos. Methodologies for Intelligent Systems (1996) (Springer-Verlag)158–167Google Scholar
  • Bertsekas D.Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control (1995) (Athena Scientific, Belmont, MA) Google Scholar
  • Bradlow E., Wainer H. Some statistical and logical considerations when rescoring tests. Statistica Sinica (1998) 8:713–728Google Scholar
  • Cook R. D., Nachtsheim C. J. A comparison of algorithms for constructing exact D-optimal designs. Technometrics (1980) 22(August):315–324CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cui D., Curry D. Prediction in marketing using the support vector machine. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(4):595–615LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dahan E., Hauser J. R., Weitz B., Wensley R. Product development—Managing a dispersed process. Handbook of Marketing (2001a) (Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Dahan E., Hauser J. R. The virtual customer. J. Product Innovation Management (2001b) 19(5):332–354CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Danaher P. J., Hardie B. G. S. Bacon with your eggs? Applications of a new bivariate beta-binomial distribution. Amer. Statistician (2005) 59(November):4Google Scholar
  • De Bono E.Lateral Thinking: A Textbook of Creativity (1970) (Ward Lock Educational, London, UK) Google Scholar
  • De Bono E.Six Thinking Hats (1985) (Little, Brown, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Dennis A. R., Valacich J. S. Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one. J. Appl. Psych. (1993) 78(4):531–537CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Evgeniou T., Boussios C., Zacharia G. Generalized robust conjoint estimation. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(3):415–429LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Federov V. V., Studden W. J., Klimko E. M.Theory of Optimal Experiments (1972) (Academic Press, New York) . Translated and edited by W. J. Studden and E. M. KlimkoGoogle Scholar
  • Fogarty T., Kaufmann M. Varying the probability of mutation in the genetic algorithm. Proc. 3rd Internat. Conf. Genetic Algorithms (1989) (Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA) 104–109Google Scholar
  • Forbes Why companies need your ideas—How they’re tapping customers to develop new products. (2005) February 14):78–86Google Scholar
  • Gallupe B. R., Bastianutti L. M., Cooper W. H. Unblocking Brainstorms. J. Appl. Psych. (1991) 76(1):137–142CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gallupe B. R., Dennis A. R., Cooper W. H., Valacich J. S., Bastianutti L. M., Nunamaker J. F. Electronic brainstorming and group size. Acad. Management J. (1992) 35(2):350–369CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gelman A. B., Carlin J. S., Stern H. S., Rubin D. B.Bayesian Data Analysis (1995) (Chapman & Hall/CRC, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldberg D. E.Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning (1989) (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Goldenberg J., Mazursky D.Creativity in Product Innovation (2002) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldenberg J., Lehmann D. R., Mazursky D. The idea itself and the circumstances of its emergence as predictors of new product success. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):69–84LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goldenberg J., Mazursky D., Solomon S. Toward identifying the inventive templates of new products: A channeled ideation approach. J. Marketing Res. (1999a) 36(May):200–210CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldenberg J., Mazursky D., Solomon S. Creativity templates: Towards identifying the fundamental schemes of quality advertisements. Marketing Sci. (1999b) 18(3):333–351LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gordon W. J. J.Synectics: The Development of Creative Capacity (1969) (Collier-Macmillan, London, UK) Google Scholar
  • Hauser J. R., Toubia O. The impact of utility balance and endogeneity in conjoint analysis. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(3):498–507LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hauser J. R., Tellis G., Griffin A. Research on innovation: A review and agenda for Marketing Science. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(6Google Scholar
  • Hesser J., Männer R. Towards an optimal mutation probability in genetic algorithms. Proc. 1st Parrallel Problem Solving from Nature (1991) (Springer, London, UK) 23–32Google Scholar
  • Hesser J., Männer R. Investigation of the m-heuristic for optimal mutation probabilities. Proc. 2nd Parrallel Problem Solving from Nature (1992) (Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 115–124Google Scholar
  • Kuhfeld W. F., Tobias R. D., Garratt M. Efficient experimental design with marketing research applications. J. Marketing Res. (1994) s31(November):545–557CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mitchell M.An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms (1996) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Nunamaker J. F., Applegate L. M., Konsynski B. R. Facilitating group creativity: Experience with a group decision support system. J. Management Inform. Systems (1987) 3(4):5–19CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Osborn A. F.Applied Imagination (1957) rev. ed.(Scribner, New York) Google Scholar
  • Ozer M. What do we know about new product idea selection. (2005) . Working paper, Center for Innovation in Management Studies, City University of Hong Kong, Hong KongGoogle Scholar
  • Prince G. M.The Practice of Creativity; A Manual for Dynamic Group Problem Solving (1970) (Harper & Row, New York) Google Scholar
  • Randall T., Terwiesch C., Ulrich K. T. User design of customized products. Marketing Sci. (2006) 26(2):268–280LinkGoogle Scholar
  • The Economist The rise of the creative consumer—The future of innovation. (2005) March 12Google Scholar
  • Toubia O. Idea generation, creativity, and incentives. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(5):411–425LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Urban G. L., Hauser J. R.Design and Marketing of New Products (1993) (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Valacich J. S., Dennis A. R., Connolly T. Idea generation in computer-based groups: A new ending to an old story. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1994) 57:448–467CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Von Hippel E. “Sticky information” and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Sci. (1994) 40(4):429–439LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Von Hippel E. Economics of product development by users: The impact of “sticky” local information. Management Sci. (1998) 44(5):629–644LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.