A Comparison of Buyer-Determined and Price-Based Multiattribute Mechanisms

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1070.0281

References

  • Amaldoss W., Rapoport A. Collaborative product and market development: Theoretical implications and experimental evidence. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(3):396–414LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson J., Frohlich M. FreeMarkets and online auctions. Bus. Strategy Rev. (2001) 12(2):59–68CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bichler M. An experimental analysis of multi-attribute auctions. Decision Support Systems (2000) 29:249–268CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bolton G. E., Katok E., Ockenfels A. How effective are online reputation mechanisms? An experimental study. Management Sci. (2004) 50(11):1587–1602LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Branco F. The design of multi-dimensional auctions. RAND J. Econom. (1997) 28(1):63–81CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bushnell J., Oren S. Bidder cost revelation in electric power auctions. J. Regulatory Econom. (1994) 6(1):5–26CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chakravarti D., Greenleaf E. A., Sinha A. R., Cheema A., Cox J. C., Friedman D., Ho T. H., Isaac R. M., Mitchell A. A., Rapoport A., Rothkopf M. H., Srivastava J., Zwick R. Auctions: Research opportunities in marketing. Marketing Lett. (2002) 13(3):281–296CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Che Y.-K. Design competition through multi-dimensional auctions. RAND J. Econom. (1993) 24(4):668–680CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen-Ritzo C.-H., Harrison T. P., Kwasnica A. M., Thomas D. J. Better, faster, cheaper: An experimental analysis of a multiattribute reverse auction mechanism with restricted information feedback. Management Sci. (2005) 51(12):1753–1762LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dholakia U. M., Simonson I. The effect of explicit reference points on consumer choice and online bidding behavior. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(2):206–217LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Emiliani M. L., Stec D. J. Online reverse auction purchasing contracts. Supply Chain Management (2001) 6(3):101–105CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Engelbrecht-Wiggans R. Optimal auctions revisited. Games Econom. Behav. (1993) 5(2):227–239CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Engelbrecht-Wiggans R., Katok E. Regret in auctions: Theory and evidence. Econom. Theory (2007) 33(1):81–101CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fay S. Partial repeat bidding in the name-your-own-price channel. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(3):407–418LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fischbacher U. z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. (2007) 10(2):171–178CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fox J. R.Arming America: How the U.S. Buys Weapons (1974) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Gneezy Uri. Step-level reasoning and bidding in auctions. Management Sci. (2005) 51(11):1633–1642LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison G. W. Theory and misbehavior in first-price auctions. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1989) 79:542–546Google Scholar
  • Herbsman Z. J., Chen W. T., Epstein W. C. Time is money: Innovative contracting methods in highway construction. J. Construction Engrg. Management (1995) 121(3):273–281CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jap S. D. Online reverse auctions: Issues, themes and prospects for the future. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (2002) 30(4):506–525CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jap S. D. An exploratory study of the introduction of online reverse auctions. J. Marketing (2003) 67:96–107CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kagel J. H., Kagel J. H., Roth A. E. Auctions: A survey of experimental research. The Handbook of Experimental Economics (1995) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 501–585CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morgan J., Steiglitz K., Reis G. The spite motive and equilibrium behavior in auctions. Contributions Econom. Anal. Policy (2003) 2(1):5Google Scholar
  • Neugebauer T., Selten R. R. Individual behavior of first-price auctions: The importance of information feedback in computerized experimental markets. Games Econom. Behav. (2006) 54(1):183–204CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ockenfels A., Selten R. Impulse balance equilibrium and feedback in first price auctions. Games Econom. Behav. (2005) 51(1):155–170CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rothkopf M. H. On auctions with withdrawable bids. Marketing Sci. (1991) 10(1):40–57LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rothkopf M. H., Teisberg T. J., Kahn E. P. Why are Vickrey auctions rare? J. Political Econom. (1990) 98(1):94–109CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seshadri S., Chatterjee K., Lilien G. L. Multiple source procurement competitions. Marketing Sci. (1991) 10(3):246–263LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shugan S. M. Marketing and designing transaction games. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(4):525–530LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sinha A. R., Greenleaf E. A. The impact of discrete bidding and bidder aggressiveness on sellers' strategies in open English auctions: Reserves and covert shilling. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19(3):244–265LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wilson R. The architecture of power markets. Econometrica (2002) 70(4):1299–1341CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.