Research Note—A Comparison of Within-Household Price Sensitivity Across Online and Offline Channels

References

• Ainslie A., Rossi P. E. Similarities in choice behavior across product categories. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(2):91–106Link, Google Scholar
• Alba J., Lynch J., Weitz B., Janiszewski C., Lutz R., Sawyer A., Wood S. Interactive home shopping: Consumer, retailer, and manufacturer incentives to participate in electronic marketplaces. J. Marketing (1997) 67:38–53Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andrews R. L., Currim I. S. Behavioral differences between consumers attracted to shopping online versus traditional supermarkets: Implications for enterprise design and marketing strategy. Internat. J. Internet Marketing Advertising (2004) 1(1):38–61Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bailey J. P. Intermediation and electronic markets: Aggregation and pricing in Internet commerce. (1998) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Bakos J. Y. Reducing buyer search costs: Implications for electronic marketplaces. Management Sci. (1997) 43(12):1676–1692Link, Google Scholar
• Becker G. A theory of the allocation of time. Econom. J. (1965) 75(August):369–377Google Scholar
• Berry S. Estimating discrete-choice models of product differentiation. RAND J. Econom. (1994) 25:242–262Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown J. R., Goolsbee A. Does the Internet make markets more competitive? Evidence from the life insurance industry. J. Political Econom. (2002) 110:481–507Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E., Smith M. D. Frictionless commerce? A comparison of Internet and conventional retailers. Management Sci. (2000) 46(4):563–585Link, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta P., Dubé J.-P., Goh K. Y. Beyond the endogeneity bias: The effect of unmeasured brand characteristics on household-level brand choice models. Management Sci. (2005) 51(5):832–849Link, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta P., Dubé J.-P., Singh V. Balancing profitability and customer welfare in a supermarket chain. Quantitative Marketing Econom. (2003) 1(1):111–147Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clemons E. K., Hann I.-H., Hitt L. M. Price dispersion and differentiation in online travel: An empirical investigation. Management Sci. (2002) 48(4):534–549Link, Google Scholar
• Cooper J. C. Prices and price dispersion in online and offline markets for contact lenses. (2006) . Working paper 283, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, D.C.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danaher P. J., Wilson I. W., Davis R. A. A comparison of online and offline consumer brand loyalty. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(4):461–476Link, Google Scholar
• Degeratu A. M., Rangaswamy A., Wu J. Consumer choice behavior in online and traditional supermarkets: The effects of brand name, price and other search attributes. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2001) 17:55–78Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elrod T., Keane M. P. A factor-analytic probit model for representing the market structure in panel data. J. Marketing Res. (1995) 32:1–16Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox E. J., Hoch S. J. Cherry picking. J. Marketing (2005) 69(1):46–62Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goolsbee A., Petrin A. The consumer gains from direct broadcast satellites and the competition with cable television. Econometrica (2004) 72(2):351–381Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hajivassiliou V., McFadden D. The method of simulated scores for the estimation of LDV models with an application to external debt crises. (1993) . Unpublished manuscript, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
• He C., Chen Y. Managing e-marketplace: A strategic analysis of nonprice advertising. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(2):175–187Link, Google Scholar
• Howard J. A., Sheth J. N.The Theory of Buying Behavior (1969) (John Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Johnson R. A., Wichern D. W.Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis (2002) (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Keane M., Rao C. R., Maddala G. S., Vinod D. Simulation estimation for panel data models with limited dependent variables. The Handbook of Statistics II Econometrics (1993) (Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam) 545–572Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lal R., Sarvary M. When and how is the Internet likely to decrease price competition? Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(4):485–503Link, Google Scholar
• Lewis M., Singh V., Fay S. An empirical study of the impact of nonlinear shipping and handling fees on purchase incidence and expenditure decisions. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(1):51–64Link, Google Scholar
• Lynch J. G., Ariely D. Wine online: Search costs affect competition on price, quality and distribution. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19(1):83–103Link, Google Scholar
• Morganosky M., Cude B. Consumer response to online grocery shopping. Internat. J. Retail Distribution Management (2000) 28(1):17–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Putrevu S., Ratchford B. T. A model of search behavior with an application to grocery shopping. J. Retailing (1997) 73(4):463–486Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shankar V., Rangaswamy A., Pusateri M. The online medium and customer price sensitivity. (2001) . Working paper, University of Maryland, College Park, MDGoogle Scholar
• Smith M. D., Brynjolfsson E. Consumer decision-making at an Internet shopbot: Brand still matters. J. Indust. Econom. (2001) 49(4):541–558Crossref, Google Scholar
• Urbany J. E., Dickson P. R., Kalapurakal R. Price search in the retail grocery market. J. Marketing (1996) 60(April):91–104Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang J., Krishnamurthi L. Customizing promotions in online stores. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):561–578Link, Google Scholar