A Convex Optimization Approach to Modeling Consumer Heterogeneity in Conjoint Estimation

References

• Allenby G. M., Rossi P. E. Marketing models of consumer heterogeneity. J. Econometrics (1999) 89(March/April):57–78Google Scholar
• Ando R. K., Zhang T. A framework for learning predictive structures from multiple tasks and unlabeled data. J. Machine Learn. Res. (2005) 6:1817–1853Google Scholar
• Arora N., Huber J. Improving parameter estimates and model prediction by aggregate customization in choice experiments. J. Consumer Res. (2001) 28(SeptemberGoogle Scholar
• Baxter J. A Bayesian/information theoretic model of learning to learn via multiple task sampling. Machine Learn. (1997) 28:7–39Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyd S., Vandenberghe L.Convex Optimization (2004) (Cambridge University Press, Oxford, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradlow E., Hu Y., Ho T.-H. A learning-based model for imputing missing levels in partial conjoint profiles. J. Marketing Res. (2004) 41(4):369–381Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bunch D. S., Louviere J. J., Anderson D. A comparison of experimental design strategies for multinominal logit models: The case of generic attributes. (1994) . Working paper, Graduate School of Management, University of California at DavisGoogle Scholar
• Carson R. T., Louviere J. J., Anderson D. A., Arabie P., Bunch D. S., Hensher D. A., Johnson R. M., Kuhfeld W. F., Steinberg D., Swait J., Timmermans H., Wiley J. B. Experimental analysis of choice. Marketing Lett. (1994) 5(4):351–367Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caruana R. Multi-task learning. Machine Learn. (1997) 28:41–75Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chaloner K., Verdinelli I. Bayesian experimental design: A review. Statistical Sci. (1995) 10(3):273–304Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cucker F., Smale S. On the mathematical foundations of learning. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (2002) 39(1):1–49Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cui D., Curry D. Prediction in marketing using the support vector machine. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(4):595–615Link, Google Scholar
• Efron B., Tibshirani R.An Introduction to the Bootstrap (1993) (Chapman and Hall, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evgeniou T., Boussios C., Zacharia G. Generalized robust conjoint estimation. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(3):415–429Link, Google Scholar
• Evgeniou T., Micchelli C., Pontil M. Learning multiple tasks with kernel methods. J. Machine Learn. Res. (2005b) 6:615–637Google Scholar
• Fisher R. A. On the mathematical foundations of theoretical statistics. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., Ser. A (1922) 222–326Google Scholar
• Gilbride T., Allenby G. M. A choice model with conjunctive, disjunctive, and compensatory screening rules. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(3):391–406Link, Google Scholar
• Gilbride T., Allenby G. M. Estimating heterogenous EBA and economic screening rule choice models. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(5):494–509Link, Google Scholar
• Girosi F., Jones M., Poggio T. Regularization theory and neural networks architectures. Neural Comput. (1995) 7:219–269Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hastie T., Tibshirani R., Friedman J. H.The Elements of Statistical Learning (2003) Springer Series in StatisticsGoogle Scholar
• Hauser J., Toubia O. The impact of utility balance and endogeneity in conjoint analysis. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(3):498–507Link, Google Scholar
• Hauser J., Tellis G. J., Griffin A. Research on innovation: A review and agenda for marketing science. Marketing Sci. (2005) 25(6):687–717Link, Google Scholar
• Huber J., Zwerina K. The importance of utility balance in efficient choice designs. J. Marketing Res. (1996) 32(August):308–317Google Scholar
• Jebara T. Multi-task feature and kernel selection for SVMs. Proc. Twenty-First Internat. Conf. Machine Learning (2004) Banff, Alberta, Canada:55–63Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaakkola T., Haussler D. Probabilistic kernel regression models. Proc. Seventh Internat. Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statist (1999) (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
• Jedidi K., Kohli R. Probabilistic subset-conjunctive models for heterogenous consumers. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42:483–494Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keerthi S., Duan K., Shevade S., Poo A. A fast dual algorithm for kernel logistic regression. Machine Learn. (2005) 61(1–3, November):151–165Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lenk P. J., DeSarbo W. S., Green P. E., Young M. R. Hierarchical Bayes conjoint analysis: Recovery of partworth heterogeneity from reduced experimental designs. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15(2):173–91Link, Google Scholar
• Liechty J. C., Fong D. K. H., DeSarbo W. S. Dynamic models incorporating individual heterogeneity: Utility evolution in conjoint analysis. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(2):285–293Link, Google Scholar
• Liu Q., Otter T., Allenby G. M. Investigating endogeneity bias in marketing. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(5):642–650Link, Google Scholar
• Louviere J. J., Hensher D. A., Swait J. D.Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications (2000) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Micchelli C., Pontil M. On learning vector–valued functions. Neural Comput. (2005) 17:177–204Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mika S., Schölkopf B., Smola A. J., Müller K.-R., Scholz M., Rätsch G., Kearns M. S., Solla S. A., Cohn D. A. Kernel PCA and de-noising in feature spaces. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (1999) 11(MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 536–542Google Scholar
• Minka T. A comparison of numerical optimizers for logistic regression. (2003) . Microsoft research tech reportGoogle Scholar
• Rossi P. E., Allenby G. M. A Bayesian approach to estimating household parameters. J. Marketing Res. (1993) 30(2):171–182Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rossi P. E., Allenby G. M. Bayesian statistics and marketing. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(3):304–328Link, Google Scholar
• Rossi P. E., Allenby G. M., McCulloch R.Bayesian Statistics and Marketing (2005) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shao J. Linear model selection via cross-validation. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1993) 88(422):486–494Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srinivasan V., Aronson J. E., Zionts S. A strict paired comparison linear programming approach to nonmetric conjoint analysis. Operations Research: Methods, Models and Applications (1998) (Quorum Books, Westport, CT) 97–111Google Scholar
• Srinivasan V., Shocker A. D. Linear programming techniques for multidimensional analysis of preferences. Psychometrica (1973) 38(3):337–369Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thrun S., Pratt L.Learning to Learn (1997) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
• Tikhonov A. N., Arsenin V. Y.Solutions of Ill-Posed Problems (1977) (W. H. Winston, Washington, D.C.) Google Scholar
• Toubia O., Hauser J. R., Simester D. I. Polyhedral methods for adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis. J. Marketing Res. (2004) 46(February):116–131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toubia O., Simester D. I., Hauser J. R., Dahan E. Fast polyhedral adaptive conjoint estimation. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(3):273–303Link, Google Scholar
• Vapnik V.Statistical Learning Theory (1998) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Wahba G.Splines Models for Observational Data, Vol. 59. Series in Applied Mathematics (1990) (SIAM, Philadelphia, PA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu J., Hastie T. Kernel logistic regression and the import vector machine. J. Computational Graphical Statist. (2005) 14(1):185–205Crossref, Google Scholar