Smoking Cessation: A Model of Planned vs. Actual Behavior for Time-Inconsistent Consumers

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1070.0298

References

  • Ainslie G., Haslam N., Loewenstein G., Elster J. Hyperbolic discounting. Choice Over Time (1992) (Russell Sage Foundation, New York) 57–92Google Scholar
  • Akerlof G. Procrastination and obedience. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1991) 8:1–19Google Scholar
  • Ariely D., Wertenbroch K. Procrastination, deadlines, and performance: Self-control by precommitment. Psych. Sci. (2002) 13:219–224CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Assunção J. L., Meyer R. The rational effect of price promotions on sales and consumption. Management Sci. (1993) 39:517–535LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Becker G. S., Murphy K. M. A theory of rational addiction. J. Political Econom. (1988) 96:675–700CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burns J., Burns J. Looking to the future. Special Report: Business and Health (1992) (Medical Economics Publishing, Washington, D.C.) 21–22Google Scholar
  • Chaloupka F. Rational addictive behavior and cigarette smoking. J. Political Econom. (1991) 99(4):722–742CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chaloupka F., Warner K. The economics of smoking. Handbook of Health Economics (2000) (North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 1539–1627Chapter 29Google Scholar
  • Chaloupka F., Taurus J., Grossman M., Jha P., Chaloupka F. The economics of addiction. Tobacco Control in Developing Countries (2000) (Oxford University Press, New York) 107–129Google Scholar
  • Chesson H., Viscusi W. K. The heterogeneity of time-risk tradeoffs. J. Behavioral Decision Making (2000) 13:251–258CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cropper M., Aydede S., Portney P. Discounting human lives. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. (1991) 73(1991):1410–1415CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cropper M., Aydede S., Portney P. Rates of time preference for saving lives. Amer. Econom. Rev. (Papers and Proceedings) (1992) 82(2):469–472Google Scholar
  • Dholakia U. M., Simonson I. The effect of explicit reference points on consumer choice and online bidding behavior. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(2):206–217LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Douglas S. The duration of the smoking habit. Econom. Inquiry (1998) 36(1):49–64CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Douglas S., Hariharan G. The hazard of starting smoking: Estimates from a split population duration model. J. Health Econom. (1994) 13:213–230CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frederick S., Loewenstein G., O'Donoghue T. Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. J. Econom. Literature (2002) XL:351–401CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene W. H.Econometric Analysis (2000) 4th ed.(Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Gruber J. Smoking's internalities. Regulation (2002) Winter):52–57Google Scholar
  • Gruber J. The new economics of smoking. NBER Reporter (2003) Summer):19–22Google Scholar
  • Gruber J., Koszegi B. Is addiction rational? Theory and evidence. Quart. J. Econom. (2001) 116(4):1261–1303CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gruber J., Koszegi B. Tax incidence when individuals are time-inconsistent: The case of cigarette excise taxes. J. Public Econom. (2004) 88:1959–1987CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hanemann W. M., Loomis J., Kanninen B. Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. (1991) 73:1255–1262CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helsen K., Schmittlein D. C. Analyzing duration times in marketing: Evidence for the effectiveness of hazard rate models. Marketing Sci. (1993) 12(Fall):395–414LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hoch S. J., Loewenstein G. F. Time-inconsistent preferences and consumer self-control. J. Consumer Res. (1991) 17:492–507CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D., Kahneman D., Diener E., Schwarz N. Objective happiness. Well-Being: Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (1999) (Russell Sage Foundation Press, New York) 3–27Google Scholar
  • Kilbourne J.Deadly Persuasion: Why Women and Girls Must Fight the Addictive Power of Advertising (1999) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Kivetz R., Simonson I. Self-control for the righteous: Toward a theory of pre-commitment to indulgence. J. Consumer Res. (2002) 29:199–217CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laibson D. Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quart. J. Econom. (1997) 112:443–477CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laibson D. Intertemporal decision making. Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science (2003) (Nature Publishing Group, London, UK) Google Scholar
  • Loewenstein G., Prelec D. Anomalies in intertemporal choice: Evidence and an interpretation. Quart. J. Econom. (1992) 107:573–598CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loewenstein G., Thaler R. Anomalies: Intertemporal choice. J. Econom. Perspect. (1989) 3:181–193CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacKinnon D. P., Lapin A. Effects of alcohol warnings and advertisements: A test of the boomerang hypothesis. Psych. Marketing (1998) 15(October):707–726CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McFadden D. Contingent valuation and social choice. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. (1994) 76:689–708CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miilunpalo S., Vuori I., Oja P., Pasanen M., Urponen H. Self-rated health status as a health measure: The predictive value of self-reported health status on the use of physician services and on mortality in the working-age population. J. Clinical Epidemiology (1997) 50(5):517–528CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mitchell R. C., Carson R. T.Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method (1989) (Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.) Google Scholar
  • O'Donoghue T., Rabin M. Doing it now or later. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1999) 89:103–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O'Donoghue T., Rabin M. The economics of immediate gratification. J. Behavioral Decision Making (2000) 13:233–250CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Olekalns N., Bardsley P. Rational addiction to caffeine: An analysis of coffee consumption. J. Political Econom. (1995) 104(5):1100–1104CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pearce J., Choi W. S., Gilpin E. A., Farkas A. J., Berry C. C. Tobacco industry promotion of cigarettes and adolescent smoking. J. Amer. Medical Assoc. (1998) 279(7):511–515CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pechmann C., Ratneshwar S. The effects of antismoking and cigarette advertising on young adolescents' perceptions of peers who smoke. J. Consumer Res. (1994) 21(September):236–251CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pechmann C., Shih C. Smoking scenes in movies and antismoking advertisements before movies: Effects on youth. J. Marketing (1999) 63(July):1–13CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pechmann C., Zhao G., Goldberg M., Reibling E. What to convey in antismoking advertisements for adolescents? The use of protection motivation theory to identify effective message themes. J. Marketing (2003) 67(April):1–18CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pollay R. W., Siddarth S., Siegel M., Haddix A., Merritt R., Giovino G., Eriksen M. The last straw? Cigarette advertising and realized market shares among youths and adults, 1979–1993. J. Marketing (1996) 60(April):1–16CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rabin M. Psychology and economics. J. Econom. Literature (1998) 36(1):11–46Google Scholar
  • Shaw M., Mitchell R., Darling D. Time for a smoke? One cigarette reduces your life by 11 minutes. British Medical J. (2000) 320(1):53CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shugan S. M. Are consumers rational? Experimental evidence? Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(1):1–7LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Strotz R. H. Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1955) 25(3):165–180CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sun B. Promotion effect on endogenous consumption. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(3):430–443LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Suranovic S., Goldfarb R., Leonerd T. An economic theory of cigarette addiction. J. Health Econom. (1999) 18:1–29CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thaler R. H. Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency. Econom. Lett. (1981) 8:201–207CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thaler R. H., Shefrin H. M. An economic theory of self-control. J. Political Econom. (1981) 89:392–406CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Waters T. M., Sloan F. A. Why do people drink? Tests of the rational addiction model. Appl. Econom. (1995) 27:727–736CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wertenbroch K. Consumption self-control via purchase quantity rationing of virtue and vice. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17:317–337LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wertenbroch K., Loewenstein G., Read D., Baumeister R. Self-rationing: Self-control in consumer choice. Time and Decision: Economic and Psychological Perspectives on Intertemporal Choice (2003) (Russell Sage Foundation, New York) 491–516Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.