Practice Prize Paper—BRAN*EQT: A Multicategory Brand Equity Model and Its Application at Allstate

References

• Aaker D. A.Building Strong Brands (1996) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Ailawadi K. L., Lehmann D. R., Neslin S. A. Revenue premium as an outcome measure of brand equity. J. Marketing (2003) 67(4):1–17Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angwin J., Vranica S. Marketer's tactic signals big shift in a TV ad ritual. Wall Street J. (2006) January 4):A1Google Scholar
• Balachander S., Ghose S. Reciprocal spillover effects: A strategic benefit of brand extensions. J. Marketing (2003) 67(1):4–13Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barth M. A., Clinch G. Revalued financial, tangible, and intangible assets: Associations with share prices and non-market-based value estimates. J. Accounting Res. (1998) 30(3):199–233(Supplement)Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barth M. A., Krasznik R., McNichols M. F. Analyst coverage and intangible assets. J. Accounting Res. (2001) 39(1):1–35Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barth M. A., Clement M., Foster G., Krasznik R. Brand values and capital market valuation. Rev. Accounting Stud. (1998) 3(1–2):41–68Crossref, Google Scholar
• Broadbent S. One way TV advertisements work. J. Market Res. Soc. (1979) 21(3):139–165Google Scholar
• Cabral L. M. B. Stretching firm and brand reputation. RAND J. Econom. (2000) 31(4):658–673Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carhart M. On persistence in mutual fund performance. J. Finance (1997) 52(1):57–82Crossref, Google Scholar
• Celemi Annual Report 2002 Celemi Group. (2003) (Celemi Group, Malmo, Sweden) Google Scholar
• Choi J. P. Brand extension as informational leverage. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1998) 65(4):655–669Crossref, Google Scholar
• Copeland T. K., Koller T., Murrin J.Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies (2000) 3rd ed.(John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Copeland T. E., Weston J. F.Financial Theory and Corporate Policy (1988) 3rd ed.(Addison-Wesley, Reading, PA) Google Scholar
• CoreBrand Analysis Modeling the corporate brand's financial impacts. (2004) . Presentation, Corporate Branding, LLC, Stamford, CTGoogle Scholar
• Damodaran A. Dealing with intangibles: Valuing brand names, flexibility and patents. (2006) . Working paper, New York University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Davidson R., MacKinnon J. G. Several tests for model specification in the presence of alternative hypotheses. Econometrica (1981) 49(3):781–793Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dillon W. R., Madden T. J., Kirmani A., Mukherjee S. Understanding what's in a brand rating: A model for assessing brand and attribute effects and their relationship to brand equity. J. Marketing Res. (2001) 38(4):415–429Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubin J. A. The demand for branded and unbranded products: An econometric method for valuing intangible assets. Studies in Consumer Demand: Econometric Methods Applied to Market Data (1998) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA) 77–127Chapter 4Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdem T. An empirical analysis of umbrella branding. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35(3):339–351Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdem T., Sun B. An empirical investigation of spillover effects of advertising and sales promotion in umbrella branding. J. Marketing Res. (2002) 39(4):408–420Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdem T., Swait J. Brand equity as a signaling phenomenon. J. Consumer Pysch. (1998) 7(2):131–157Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdem T., Swait J. Brand credibility and its role in brand choice and consideration. J. Consumer Res. (2004) 31(1):191–199Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdem T., Swait J., Valenzuela A. Brands as signals: A cross-country validation study. J. Marketing (2006) 70(1):34–49Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdem T., Swait J., Broniarczyk S., Chakravarti D., Kapferer J.-N., Keane M., Roberts J., Steenkamp J.-B. E. M., Zettelmeyer F. Brand equity, consumer learning and choice. Marketing Lett. (1999) 10(3):301–318Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama E., French K. Common risk factors in returns on stocks and bonds. J. Financial Econom. (1993) 33(1):3–56Crossref, Google Scholar
• Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142: Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (2001a) (FASB, Stamford, CT) Google Scholar
• Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)Proposal for a New Agenda Project: Disclosure of Information About Intangible Assets Not Recognized in Financial Statements (2001b) (FASB, Stamford, CT) Google Scholar
• Fischer M. Valuing brand assets in financial reports: A model proposition. (2004) . Working paper, University of Kiel, Kiel, GermanyGoogle Scholar
• Greene W. H.Econometric Analysis (2000) 4th ed.(Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall, NJ) Google Scholar
• Guadagni P. M., Little J. D. C. A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(3):203–238Link, Google Scholar
• Gupta S., Zeithaml V. Customer metrics and their impact on financial performance. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(6):718–739Link, Google Scholar
• Hanssens D. M., Parsons L. J., Schultz R. L.Market Response Models, Econometric and Time Series Analysis (2001) 2nd ed.(Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Hausman J. A. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica (1978) 46(6):1251–1271Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hensher D. A., Greene W. H. The mixed logit model: The state of the practice. Transportation (2003) 30(May):133–176Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hjorth-Anderson C. The concept of quality and the efficiency of markets for consumer products. J. Consumer Res. (1984) 11(3):719–727Google Scholar
• Holbrook M. B. Product quality, attributes, and brand name as determinants of price: The case of consumer electronics. Marketing Lett. (1992) 3(1):71–83Crossref, Google Scholar
• Interbrand Best global brands. (2006) . www.interbrand.comGoogle Scholar
• Joshi A., Hanssens D. M. Advertising spending and market capitalization. (2004) . MSI Report 04-110. Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Kalaignanam K., Shankar V., Varadarajan R. P. Asymmetric new product development alliance: Win-win or win-lose partnership? Management Sci. (2007) 53(3):357–374Link, Google Scholar
• Kallapur S., Kwan S. Y. S. The value relevance and reliability of brand assets recognized by U.K. firms. Accounting Rev. (2004) 79(1):151–172Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kamakura W. A., Russell G. J. Measuring brand value with scanner data. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1993) 10(1):9–22Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keller K. L. Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. J. Marketing (1993) 57(1):1–22Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keller K. L.Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity (2003) 2nd ed.(Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Keller K. L., Lehmann D. R. Brands and branding: Research findings and future priorities. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(6):740–759Link, Google Scholar
• Kothari S. P., Warner G., Echo B. E. The econometrics of event studies. Handbook in Empirical Corporate Finance (2005) (Elsevier-North Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) . Chapter 1Google Scholar
• Lam S. Y., Shankar V., Erramilli M. K., Murthy B. Customer value, satisfaction, loyalty, and switching costs: An illustration from a business-business service context. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (2004) 32(3):293–311Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lilien G. L., Rangaswamy A.Marketing Engineering (2002) 2nd ed.(Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• McAlister L., Srinivasan R., Kim M. Advertising, research and development of systematic risk of the firm. J. Marketing (2007) 71(1):35–48Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFadden D., Zarembka P. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Frontiers in Econometrics (1974) (Academic Press, New York) 105–142Google Scholar
• Naik P. A., Raman K., Winer R. S. Planning marketing-mix strategies in the presence of interaction effects. Marketing Sci. (2006) 24(1):25–34Link, Google Scholar
• Park C. S., Srinivasan V. A survey-based method for measuring and understanding brand equity and its extendibility. J. Marketing Res. (1994) 31(2):271–288Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pollack R. A., Wales T. J. The likelihood dominance criterion: A new approach to model selection. J. Econometrics (1991) 47(2–3):227–242Crossref, Google Scholar
• Proprietary Report Brand asset valuator. (2006) (Young and Rubicam, New York) Google Scholar
• Rao V., Agarwal M. K., Dahloff D. How is manifest branding strategy related to the intangible value of a corporation? J. Marketing (2004) 68(4):126–141Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rizzo J. Advertising and competition in the ethical pharmaceutical industry: The case of antihypertensive drugs. J. Law Econom. (1999) 42(1):89–116Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts J. H., Lilien G. L., Eliashberg J., Lilien G. L. Explanatory and predictive models of consumer behavior. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Marketing (1993) (Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 27–82Google Scholar
• Roberts J. H., Nedungadi P. Studying consideration in the consumer decision process: Progress and challenges. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1995) 12(1):3–7Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts J. H., Urban G. L. Modelling multiattribute utility, risk, and belief dynamics for new consumer durable brand choice. Management Sci. (1988) 34(2):167–185Link, Google Scholar
• Roberts J. H., Morrison P., Chandrasekharan M., Gordon A. Measuring sources and outcomes of brand equity. Marketing Accountabilities and Responsibilities: Conf. Proc. (2004) (Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand, ANZMAC) Google Scholar
• Shocker A., Weitz B., Leuthesser L. A perspective on brand equity: Principles and issue. Defining, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity: Conf. Summary (1988) . MSI Report 88-104, 2. Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Shugan S. M. The cost of thinking. J. Consumer Res. (1980) 7(4):99–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon C. J., Sullivan M. W. The measurement and determination of brand equity: A financial approach. Marketing Sci. (1993) 12(1):28–52Link, Google Scholar
• Sorescu A. B., Shankar V., Kushwaha T. L. New product preannouncement and shareholder value: Don't make promises you can't keep. J. Marketing Res. (2007) 44(3):468–489Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srinivasan V. Network models for estimating brand-specific effects in multi-attribute marketing models. Management Sci. (1979) 25(1):11–21Link, Google Scholar
• Srinivasan V., Park C. S. Surprising robustness of the self-explicated approach of customer preference structure measurement. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 34(2):286–291Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srinivasan V., Park C. S., Chang D. R. An approach to the measurement, analysis, and prediction of brand equity and its sources. Management Sci. (2005) 51(9):1433–1448Link, Google Scholar
• Swait J., Erdem T., Louvière J., Dubelaar C. The equalization price: A measure of consumer-perceived brand equity. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1993) 10(1):23–45Crossref, Google Scholar
• Train K.Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (2003) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar