Estimating Willingness to Pay with Exaggeration Bias-Corrected Contingent Valuation Method

References

• Blackburn M., Harrison G. W., Rutström E. E. Statistical bias function and informative hypothetical surveys. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. (1994) 76:1084–1088Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blumenschein K., Johannesson M., Yokoyama K., Freeman P. R. Hypothetical versus real willingness to pay in the health care sector: Results from a field experiment. J. Health Econom. (2001) 20:441–457Crossref, Google Scholar
• Box G. E. P., Cox D. R. An analysis of transformations. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B (1964) 24:187–220Google Scholar
• Cameron T. A., James M. D. Estimating willingness to pay from survey data: An alternative pretest-market evaluation procedure. J. Marketing Res. (1987) 24:389–395Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carson R. T., Mitchell R. C. A bibliography of contingent valuation studies and papers. (1994) (Natural Resource Damage Assessment, Inc., La Jolla, CA) Google Scholar
• Champ P. A., Bishop R. C., Brown T. C., McCollum D. W. Using donation mechanisms to value nonuse benefits from public goods. J. Environ. Econom. Management (1997) 33:151–162Crossref, Google Scholar
• Churchill G. A., Iacobucci D.Marketing Research: Methodological Foundations (2005) 9th ed.(South-Western College Publications, Cincinnati, OH) Google Scholar
• Cummings R. G., Brookshire D. S., Schulze W. D.Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method (1986) (Rowman and Allanheld, Totowa, NJ) Google Scholar
• Cummings R. G., Harrison G. W., Rutström E. E. Homegrown values and hypothetical surveys: Is the dichotomous choice approach incentive-compatible? Amer. Econom. Rev. (1995) 85:260–266Google Scholar
• Hanemann M. W. Valuing the environment through contingent valuation. J. Econom. Perspect. (1994) 8:19–43Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horowitz J. L. Semiparametric estimation of a regression model with an unknown transformation of the dependent variable. Econometrica (1996) 64:103–137Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsiao C., Sun B.-H. Modeling survey response bias-with an analysis of the demand for an advanced electronic device. J. Econometrics (1998) 89:15–39Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johannesson M., Liljas B., Johansson P. O. An experimental comparison of dichotomous choice contingent valuation questions and real purchase decisions. Appl. Econom. (1998) 30:643–647Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johannesson M., Blomquist G. C., Blumenschen K., Johansson P. O., Liljas B., O'Connor R. M. Calibrating hypothetical willingness to pay responses. J. Risk Uncertainty (1999) 18:21–32Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein R., Sherman R. Estimating new product demand from biased survey data. J. Econometrics (1997) 76:53–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell R. C., Carson R. T.Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method (1989) (Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.) Google Scholar
• Voelckner F. An empirical comparison of methods for measuring consumers' willingness to pay. Marketing Lett. (2006) 17:137–149Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wertenbroch K., Skiera B. Measuring consumers' willingness to pay at the point of purchase. J. Marketing Res. (2002) 39:228–241Crossref, Google Scholar