Defensive Marketing Strategies

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1070.0334

References

  • Aaker D., Myers J.Advertising Management (1975) (Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Bass F. The theory of stochastic preference and brand switching. J. Marketing Res. (1974) 11(February):1–20CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beshel J. J. Defensive marketing strategy in the prescription analgesic market. (1982) . Master's thesis, M.I.T., Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Bettman J. R.An Information Processing Theory of Consumer Choice (1979) (Reading, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.) Google Scholar
  • Blackorby C., Primont D., Russell R. R. Budgeting, decentralization, and aggregation. Ann. Econom. Soc. Measurement (1975) 4(1):23–34Google Scholar
  • Blattberg R., Golanty J. An early test market forecasting and diagnostic model for new product planning. J. Marketing (1978) 15(2):192–202CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blattberg R., Eppen G., Lieberman J. A theoretical and empirical evaluation of price deals for consumer nondurables. J. Marketing (1981) 45(1):116–129CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blin J. M., Dodson J. The relationship between attributes, brand preference and choice. Management Sci. (1980) 26(6):606–619LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Drake A. W.Fundamentals of Applied Probability Theory (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Debreu G.Theory of Value: An Axiomatic Analysis of Economic Equilibrium (1959) (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York) Google Scholar
  • Einhorn H. The use of nonlinear noncompensatory models in decision making. Psych. Bull. (1970) 73(3):221–230CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Einhorn H., Kleinmuntz D., Kleinmuntz B. Linear regression and process-tracing models of judgment. Psych. Rev. (1979) 86(5):465–485CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Givon M., Horsky D. Market share models as approximators of aggregated heterogeneous brand choice behavior. Management Sci. (1978) 24(13):1404–1416LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Green P., Devita M. T. The robustness of linear models under correlated attribute conditions. Proc. 1975 Educator's Conf. (1975) (American Marketing Association, Chicago) 108–111Google Scholar
  • Green P., Rao B.Applied Multidimensional Scaling (1972) (Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc., New York) Google Scholar
  • Green P., Srinivasan V. Conjoint analysis in consumer research: Issues and outlook. J. Consumer Res. (1978) 5(2):103–123CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Green P., Wind Y. New way to measure consumer's judgments. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1975) July–August):107–117Google Scholar
  • Hauser J. R., Simmie P. Profit maximizing perceptual positions: An integrated theory for the selection of product features and price. Management Sci. (1981) 27(1):33–56LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hauser J. R., Shugan S. M. Intensity measures of consumers' preference. Oper. Res. (1980) 28(2):278–320LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hauser J. R., Urban G. L., Srivastava R. K., Shocker A. D. Prelaunch forecasting of new consumer durables: Ideas on a consumer value-priority model. Analytical Approaches to Product and Market Planning: The Second Conf. (1982) (Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA) 276–296Google Scholar
  • Hise R. T., McGinnis M. A. Product elimination: Practices, policies, and ethics. Bus. Horizons (1975) June):25–32CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jain A. K., Acito F., Malhotra N. K., Mahajan V. A comparison of the internal validity of alternative parameter estimation methods in decompositional multi-attribute preference models. J. Marketing Res. (1979) 16(August):313–322CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson R. M. Marketing segmentation: A strategic management tool. J. Marketing Res. (1971) 8(February):13–18CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keon J. W. The bargain value model and a comparison of managerial implications with the linear learning model. Management Sci. (1980) 26(11):1117–1130LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kotler P.Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning and Control (1980) 4th ed.(Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Lancaster K. J.Consumer Demand: A New Approach (1971) (Columbia University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Lancaster K. J. Competition and product variety. J. Bus. (1980) 53(3, part 2):S79–S104CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lane W. J. Product differentiation in a market with endogenous sequential entry. Bell J. Econom. (1980) 11(1):237–260CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Little J. D. C. A model of adaptive control of promotional spending. Oper. Res. (1966) 14(6):1075–1098LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Little J. D. C. Decision support systems for marketing managers. J. Marketing (1979) 43(3):9–27CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Massy W. F., Montgomery D. B., Morrison D. G.Stochastic Models of Buying Behavior (1970) (Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • McFadden D., Zarembka P. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Frontiers in Econometrics (1973) (Academy Press, New York) 105–142Google Scholar
  • Pekelman D., Sen S. Stochastic weights in multiattribute decision making. Adv. Consumer Res. (1975) 81–87Google Scholar
  • Pekelman D., Sen S. Improving prediction in conjoint measurement. J. Marketing Res. (1979) 16(May):211–220CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pessemier E. A.Product Management: Strategy and Organization (1982) (Wiley/Hamilton, New York) Google Scholar
  • Ratchford B. T. The new economic theory of consumer behavior: An interpretive essay. J. Consumer Res. (1975) 2(September):65–75CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ratchford B. T. Operationalizing economic models of demand for product characteristics. J. Consumer Res. (1979) 6(1):76–84CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scherer F. M.Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance (1980) 2nd ed.(Rand McNally College Publishing Co., Chicago) Google Scholar
  • Schmalensee R. Economies of scale and barriers to entry. J. Political Econom. (1981) 89(December):1228–1238CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schmalensee R., Hildenbrand W. The new industrial organization and the economic analysis of modern markets. Advances in Economic Theory (1982) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA) 253–285Google Scholar
  • Shocker A. D., Srinivasan V. Multiattribute approaches for product concept evaluation and generation: A critical review. J. Marketing Res. (1979) 16(May):159–180CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shugan S. M. The cost of thinking. J. Consumer Res. (1980) 7(2):99–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Silk A. J., Urban G. L. Pretest market evaluation of new package goods: A model and measurement methodology. J. Marketing Res. (1978) 15(May):171–191CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Srinivasan V. A general procedure for estimating consumer preference distributions. J. Marketing Res. (1975) 12(November):377–389CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Srinivasan V., McAlister L. Comments on the role of price in individual utility judgments. Research in Marketing (1982) Supplement 1(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 81–90Google Scholar
  • Stern L. W., El-Ansary A. I.Marketing Channels (1982) 2nd ed.(Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Stigler G. J. A theory of oligopoly. J. Political Econom. (1964) 72(February):44–61CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strotz R. H. The empirical implications of a utility tree. Econometrica (1957) 27(3):269–280CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Urban G. L. PERCEPTOR: A model for product positioning. Management Sci. (1975) 21(8):858–871LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Urban G. L., Hauser J. R.Design and Marketing of New Products (1980) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Wind Y.Product Policy: Concepts, Methods, and Strategy (1982) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Wind Y., Spitz L. K. Analytical approach to marketing decisions in health-care organizations. Oper. Res. (1976) 24(5):973–990LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wittink D., Montgomery D. Predictive validity of tradeoff analysis for alternative segmentation schemes. Proc. Amer. Marketing Association's Educator's Conf. (1979) Minneapolis:68–73Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.