The Role of Targeted Communication and Contagion in Product Adoption

References

• Bandiera O., Rasul I. Social networks and technology adoption in northern mozambique. Econom. J. (2006) 116(514):869–902Google Scholar
• Bass F. M. A new product growth model for consumer durables. Management Sci. (1969) 13(5):215–227Link, Google Scholar
• Bell D. R., Song S. Neighborhood effects and trial on the Internet: Evidence from online grocery retailing. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2007) 5(4):361–400Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berndt E. R., Pindyck R. S., Azoulay P. Consumption externalities and diffusion in pharmaceutical markets: Antiulcer drugs. J. Indust. Econom. (2003) 101(2, June):243–270Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bronnenberg B. J., Mela C. Market roll-out and retail adoption for new brands of repeat purchase goods. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):500–518Link, Google Scholar
• Bucklin R. E., Siddarth S., Silva-Risso J. M. Distribution intensity and new car choice. J. Marketing Res. (2008) 45(4):473–486Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt R. S. Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. Amer. J. Sociol. (1987) 92(6):1287–1335Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman J. S., Katz E., Menzel H.Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study (1966) (The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Indianapolis) Google Scholar
• Conley T. G., Topa G. Estimating dynamic local interactions models. J. Econometrics (2007) 140(1):282–303Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conley T. G., Udry C. R. Learning about a new technology: Pineapple in Ghana. (2007) . Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago. http://www.econ.yale.edu/∼cru2//pdf/conleyudry07rev.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Conley T. G., Flyer F., Tsiang G. R. Spillovers from local market human capital and the spatial distribution of productivity in Malaysia. Adv. Econom. Anal. Policy (2003) 3(1). Article 5Google Scholar
• Debruyne M., Reibstein D. J. Competitor see, competitor do: Incumbent entry in new market niches. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(1):55–66Link, Google Scholar
• Godes D., Mayzlin D. Using online conversation to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):545–560Link, Google Scholar
• Hauser J., Tellis G. J., Griffin A. Research on innovation: A review and agenda for marketing science. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(6):687–717Link, Google Scholar
• Kalnins A. An empirical analysis of territorial encroachment within franchised and company-owned branded chains. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):476–489Link, Google Scholar
• Li X. Cheep talk and bogus network externalities in the emerging technology market. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(4):531–543Link, Google Scholar
• Manchanda P., Rossi P. E., Chintagunta P. K. Response modeling with non-random marketing mix variables. J. Marketing Res. (2004) 41(November):464–478Google Scholar
• Manski C. Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1993) 60:531–542Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manski C. Economic analysis of social interactions. J. Econom. Perspectives (2000) 14(3):115–136Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nair H., Manchanda P., Bhatia T. Asymmetric effects in physician prescription behavior: The role of opinion leaders. (2006) . Working paper, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CAGoogle Scholar
• Narayanan S., Manchanda P. Heterogeneous learning and the targeting of marketing communication for new products. Marketing Sci. (2009) . ForthcomingLink, Google Scholar
• Narayanan S., Manchanda P., Chintagunta P. K. Temporal differences in the role of marketing communication in new product categories. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(August):278–290Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nerlove M., Arrow K. J. Optimal advertising policy under dynamic conditions. Economica (1962) 29(May):129–142Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers E. M.Diffusion of Innovations (2003) 5th ed.(The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Sorensen A. T. Social learning and health plan choice. RAND J. Econom. (2006) 37(4):929–945Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stern S., Trajtenberg M. Empirical implications of physician authority in pharmaceutical decision making. J. Health Econom. (1998) . Submitted. http://www.tau.ac.il/∼manuel/pdfs/Empirical%20Implications%20of%20Physician%20Authority.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Strang D., Tuma N. B. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in diffusion. Amer. J. Sociol. (1993) 99(3):614–639Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C., Lilien G. L. Medical innovation revisited: Social contagion versus marketing effort. Amer. J. Sociol. (2001a) 106(5):1409–1435Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau 2000 Census summary file 1 and 3. (2000) . http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/2001/sumfile1.html, http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/2002/sumfile3.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Van den Bulte C., Lilien G. L. Two-stage partial observability models of innovation adoption. (2001b) . Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, University Park, PA. (available at http://marketing.wharton.upenn.edu/ideas/pdf/VandenBulte/2stage03edited.pdf)Google Scholar
• Wheat R. D., Morrison D. G. Assessing purchase timing models: Whether or not is preferable to when. Marketing Sci. (1990) 9(2, Spring):162–170Link, Google Scholar