BidAnalyzer: A Method for Estimation and Selection of Dynamic Bidding Models

References

• Ariely D., Simonson I. Buying, bidding, playing or competing? Value assessment and decision dynamics in online auctions. J. Consumer Psych. (2003) 13(1–2):113–123Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bapna R., Jank W., Shmueli G. Price formation and its dynamics in online auctions. (2004) . Working paper, University of Maryland, College ParkCrossref, Google Scholar
• Bass F. M., Bruce N., Majumdar S., Murthi B. P. S. Wearout effects of different advertising themes: A dynamic Bayesian model of the advertising-sales relationship. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(2):179–195Link, Google Scholar
• Beall S., Carter C., Carter P. L., Germer T., Hendrick T., Jap S., Kaufmann L., Maciejewski D., Monczka R., Petersen K. The role of reverse auctions in strategic sourcing. (2003) . Research paper, Center for Advanced Purchasing Studies (CAPS), Tempe, AZGoogle Scholar
• Bikhchandani S., Hirshleifer D., Welch I. A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. J. Political Econom. (1992) 100(5):992–1026Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradlow E. T., Park Y.-H. Bayesian estimation of bid sequences in Internet auctions using a generalized record-breaking model. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(2):218–229Link, Google Scholar
• Burnham K. P., Anderson D. R.Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach (2002) 2nd ed.(Springer-Verlag, New York) Google Scholar
• Dekimpe M. G., Franses P. H., Hanssens D. M., Naik P. A., Wierenga B. Time series models in marketing. Handbook of Marketing Decisions-Making Models (2008) (Springer, New York) 373–398Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durbin J., Koopman S. J.Time Series Analysis by State Space Methods (2001) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Emiliani M. L. Business-to-business online auctions: Key issues for purchasing process improvement. Supply Chain Management (2000) 5(4):176–186Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frühwirth-Schnatter S.Finite Mixture and Markov Switching Models (2006) (Springer, New York) Google Scholar
• Häubl G., Popkowski-Leszczyc P. T. L. Bidding frenzy: How the speed of competitor reaction influences product valuations in auctions. (2006) . Working paper, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaGoogle Scholar
• Heyman J., Orhun Y., Ariely D. Auction fever: The effect of opponents and quasi endowment on product valuations. J. Interactive Marketing (2004) 18(4):7–21Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hohner G., Rich J., Ng E., Reid G., Davenport A. J., Kalagnanam J. R., Lee H. S., An C. Combinatorial and quantity-discount procurement auctions benefit Mars, Incorporated and its suppliers. Interfaces (2003) 33(1):23–35Link, Google Scholar
• Hurvich C. M., Tsai C.-L. Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika (1989) 76(2):297–307Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jap S. D. Online reverse auctions: Issues, themes, and prospects for the future. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (2002) 30(4):506–525Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katok E., Kwasnica A. M. Time is money: The effect of clock speed on seller's revenue in Dutch auctions. (2002) . ISBM Report 11-2002, The Pennsylvania State University, University ParkGoogle Scholar
• Klemperer P. Auction theory: A guide to the literature. J. Econom. Surveys (1999) 13(3):227–286Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ku G., Malhotra D., Murnighan J. K. Towards a competitive arousal model of decision making: A study of auction fever in live and Internet auctions. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2005) 96:89–103Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mabert V. A., Skeels J. A. Internet reverse auctions: Valuable tools in experienced hands. Business Horizons (2002) 70–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAfee R. P., McMillan J. Auctions and bidding. J. Econom. Literature (1987) 25(2):699–738Google Scholar
• Metty T., Harlan R., Samelson Q., Moore T., Morris T., Sorenson R., Schneur A., Schneur O. R. R., Kanner J., Potts K., Robbins J. Reinventing the supplier negotiation process at Motorola. Interfaces (2005) 35(1):7–23Link, Google Scholar
• Naik P. A., Raman K. Understanding the impact of synergy in multimedia communications. J. Marketing Res. (2003) 40(4):375–388Crossref, Google Scholar
• Naik P. A., Mantrala M., Sawyer A. Planning media schedules in the presence of dynamic advertising quality. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(3):214–235Link, Google Scholar
• Naik P. A., Raman K., Winer R. Planning marketing-mix strategies in the presence of interactions. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(1):25–34Link, Google Scholar
• Naik P. A., Shi P., Tsai C.-L. Extending the Akaike information criterion to mixture regression models. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (2007) 102(477):244–254Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oren S. S., Rothkopf M. H. Optimal bidding in sequential auctions. Oper. Res. (1975) 23:1080–1090Link, Google Scholar
• Park Y.-H., Rhee S. B., Bradlow E. An integrated model for who, when and how much in Internet auctions. (2003) . Working paper, Wharton Business School, University of Pennsylvania, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
• Pinker E., Seidmann A., Vakrat Y. Managing online auctions: Current business and research issues. Management Sci. (2003) 49(11):1457–1484Link, Google Scholar
• Sandholm T., Levine D., Concordia M., Martyn P., Hughes R., Jacobs J., Begg D. Changing the game in strategic sourcing at Procter & Gamble: Expressive competition enabled by optimization. Interfaces (2006) 36(1):55–72Link, Google Scholar
• Seshadri S., Chatterjee K., Lilien G. L. Multiple source procurement competitions. Marketing Sci. (1991) 10(3):246–263Link, Google Scholar
• Sheffi Y. Combinatorial auctions in the procurement of transportation services. Interfaces (2004) 34(4):245–252Link, Google Scholar
• Shugan S. M. Marketing and designing transaction games. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(4):525–530Link, Google Scholar
• Shumway R. H., Stoffer D. S. An approach to time series smoothing and forecasting using the EM algorithm. J. Time Ser. Anal. (1982) 3:253–264Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stein A., Hawking P., Wyld D. C. The 20% solution?: A case study on the efficacy of reverse auctions. Management Res. News (2003) 26(5):1–20Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tuunainen V. K., van Heck E., Koppius O. Auction speed as a design variable for Internet auctions. (2001) . Working paper, Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
• Wilcox R. T. Experts and amateurs: The role of experience in Internet auctions. Marketing Lett. (2000) 11(4):363–374Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zeithammer R. Forward-looking bidding in online auctions. J. Marketing Res. (2006) 43(3):462–476Crossref, Google Scholar