The Dissociation Between Monetary Assessment and Predicted Utility

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1080.0364

References

  • Ariely D., Loewenstein G., Prelec D. Coherent arbitrariness: Stable demand curves without stable preferences. Quart. J. Econom. (2003) 118(1):73–105CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carmon Z., Ariely D. Focusing on the forgone: Why value can appear so different to buyers and sellers. J. Consumer Res. (2000) 27(3):360–370CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dhar R., Nowlis S. M. To buy or not to buy: Response mode effects on consumer choice. J. Marketing Res. (2004) 41(4):423–432CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dholakia U. M., Simonson I. The effect of explicit reference points on consumer choice and online bidding behavior. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(3):206–217LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hsee C. K. Value seeking and prediction—Decision inconsistency: Why don't people take what they predict they'll like the most? Psychonomic Bull. Rev. (1999) 6(4):555–561CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D. D., Miller T. Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psych. Rev. (1986) 93(2):136–53CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D., Knetsch J., Thaler R. H. Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76:728–741Google Scholar
  • Khan U., Dhar R. Licensing effect in consumer choice. J. Marketing Res. (2006) 43(2):259–266CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kivetz R. The effects of effort and intrinsic motivation on risky choice. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(4):477–502LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kreps D.A Course in Microeconomic Theory (1990) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mayzlin D. Promotional chat on the Internet. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(2):155–163LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nowlis S. M., Shiv B. The influence of consumer distractions on the effectiveness of food sampling programs. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(2):157–168CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schkade D. A., Kahneman D. Does living in California make people happy? A focusing illusion in judgments of life satisfaction. Psych. Sci. (1998) 9:340–346CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shafir E., Diamond P., Tversky A. Money illusion. Quart. J. Econom. (1997) 112(2):341–374CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shiv B., Huber J. The impact of anticipating satisfaction on choice. J. Consumer Res. (2000) 27(2):202–216CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shiv B., Carmon Z., Ariely D. Placebo effects of marketing actions: Consumers may get what they paid for. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(4):383–393CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simonsohn U., Loewenstein G. Mistake #37: The effect of previously faced prices on current housing demand. Econom. J. (2006) 116(1):175–199Google Scholar
  • Simonson I., Carmon Z., O'Curry S. Experimental evidence on the negative effect of product features & promotions on brand choice. Marketing Sci. (1994) 13:23–40LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Strahilevitz M. A., Loewenstein G. The effect of ownership history on the valuation of objects. J. Consumer Res. (1998) 276–289CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sunstein C. R., Kahneman D., Schkade D., Ritov I. Predictably incoherent judgments. Stanford Law Rev. (2002) 54(6):1153–1215CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thaler R. H. Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4:199–214LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Trope Y., Liberman N. Temporal construal. Psych. Rev. (2003) 110:401–421CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A., Sattath S., Slovic P. Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psych. Rev. (1988) 95(3):371–384CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.