Slippage in Rebate Programs and Present-Biased Preferences

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1080.0391

References

  • Akerlof G. Procrastination and obedience. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1991) 81:1–19Google Scholar
  • Ault R., Beard R., Laband D., Saba R. Rebates, inventories, and intertemporal price discrimination. Econom. Inquiry (2000) 38:570–578CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bruce N., Desai P., Staelin R. Enabling the willing: Consumer rebates for durable goods. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25:350–366LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Caillaud B., Jullien B. Modeling time-inconsistent preferences. Eur. Econom. Rev. (2000) 44:1116–1124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y., Moorthy S., Zhang Z. J. Price discrimination after the purchase: Rebates as state-dependent discounts. Management Sci. (2005) 51:1131–1140LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Della Vigna S., Malmendier U. Contract design and self-control: Theory and evidence. Quart. J. Econom. (2004) 119:353–402CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gerstner E., Hess J. A theory of channel price promotions. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1991a) 81:872–886Google Scholar
  • Gerstner E., Hess J. Who benefits from large rebates: Manufacturer, retailer, or consumer? Econom. Lett. (1991b) 36:5–8CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilpatric S. Present-biased preferences, self-awareness, and shirking. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2008) 67:735–754CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoch S. J. Counterfactual reasoning and accuracy in predicting personal events. J. Exper. Psych. Learning, Memory Cognition (1985) 11:719–731CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Houston D. A., Howe J. S. An economic rationale for couponing. Quart. J. Bus. Econom. (1985) 24:37–49Google Scholar
  • Kahneman D., Lovallo D. Timid choices and bold forecasts: A cognitive perspective on risk taking. Management Sci. (1993) 39:17–31LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Laibson D. Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quart. J. Econom. (1997) 112:442–477CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lu Q., Moorthy S. Coupons versus rebates. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26:67–82LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mowen J., Mowen M. Time and outcome valuation: Implications for marketing decision making. J. Marketing (1991) 55:54–62CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nagle T.The Strategy and Tactics of Pricing: A Guide to Profitable Decision Making (1995) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Narasimhan C. A price discrimination theory of coupons. Marketing Sci. (1984) 3:128–147LinkGoogle Scholar
  • O'Donoghue T., Rabin M. Doing it now or later. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1999a) 89:103–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O'Donoghue T., Rabin M. Incentives for procrastinators. Quart. J. Econom. (1999b) 114:769–816CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O'Donoghue T., Rabin M. Choice and procrastination. Quart. J. Econom. (2001) 116:121–160CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Phelps E. S., Pollak R. A. On second-best national saving and game-equilibrium growth. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1968) 35:185–199CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Silk T. Getting started is half the battle: The influence of deadlines and consumer effort on rebate redemption. (2008) . Working paper, Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  • Soman D. The illusion of delayed incentives: Evaluating future effort-money transactions. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35:427–437CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spencer J. Rejected! Rebates get harder to collect. Wall Street Journal (2002) June 11):D1Google Scholar
  • Thaler R. Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency. Econom. Lett. (1981) 8:201–207CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.