Click Fraud

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1080.0397

References

  • Advertising AgeSearch Marketing Fact Pack 2006 (2006) November 6Google Scholar
  • Anderson S. P., Regis R. Consumer information and firm pricing: Negative externalities from improved information. Internat. Econom. Rev. (2001) 41(3):721–742CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson S. P., Renault R. Pricing, product diversity, and search costs: A Bertrand-Chamberlin-Diamond model. RAND J. Econom. (1999) 30(4):719–735CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Battelle J.The Search: How Google and Its Rivals Rewrote the Rules of Business and Transformed Our Culture (2005) (Penguin Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Baye M. R., Morgan J. Information gatekeepers on the Internet and the competitiveness of homogeneous product markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2001) 91(3):454–474CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borgers T., Cox I., Pesendorfer M., Petricek V. Equilibrium bids in sponsored search auctions: Theory and evidence. (2007) . Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  • Bradlow E. T., Schmittlein D. C. The little engines that could: Modeling the performance of World-Wide Web search engines. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19(1):43–62LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chatterjee P., Hoffman D. L., Novak T. P. Modeling the clickstream: Implications for Web-based advertising efforts. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(4):520–541LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y., He C. Paid placement: Advertising and search on the Internet. (2006) . Working paper, University of Colorado, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  • Danaher P. Modeling page views across multiple websites with an application to Internet reach and frequency prediction. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(3):422–437LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Daswani N., Stoppelman M. The anatomy of clickbot.A. (2007) . Working paper, Google Inc., Mountain View, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Dukes A., Gal-Or E. Negotiations and exclusivity contracts for advertising. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(2):222–245LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Edelman B., Schwarz M. Optimal auction design in a multi-unit environment: The case of sponsored search auctions. (2006) . Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Edelman B., Ostrovsky M., Schwarz M. Internet advertising and the generalized second-price auction: Selling billions of dollars worth of keywords. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2007) 97(1):242–259CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feng J. Optimal mechanism for selling a set of commonly ranked objects. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(3):501–512LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ghose A., Yang S. An empirical analysis of paid placement in online advertising. (2007) . Working paper, New York University, New YorkCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghosemajumder S. “Let click fraud happen”? Uh, no. (2006) . Retrieved November 4, 2007, http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2006/07/let-click-fraud-happen-uh-no.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Goldfarb A., Tucker C. E. Search engine advertising: Pricing ads to context. (2007) . Working paper, University of Toronto, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  • Goodman A. Bid fight. Target Marketing (2006) 29(2):39–41Google Scholar
  • Gupta S. Google tweaks minimum bid formula. (2007) . Retrieved February 2008, http://publications.mediapost.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.showArticle&art_aid=55639Google Scholar
  • He C., Chen Y. Managing e-marketplace: A strategic analysis of nonprice advertising. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(2):175–187LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Iyer G., Pazgal A. Internet shopping agents: Virtual co-location and competition. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(1):85–106LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Katona Z., Sarvary M. The race for sponsored links: A model of competition for search advertising. (2007) . Working paper, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, FranceGoogle Scholar
  • Manchanda P., Dube J., Goh K. Y., Chintagunta P. K. The effect of banner advertising on Internet purchasing. J. Marketing Res. (2006) 43(1):98–108CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mayzlin D. Promotional chat on the Internet. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(2):155–163LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Prasad A. Website traffic claims and Internet advertising. (2007) . Working paper, University of Texas at Dallas, DallasGoogle Scholar
  • Rutz O. J., Bucklin R. E. A model of individual keyword performance in paid search advertising. (2007a) . Working paper, Yale University, New Haven, CTCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rutz O. J., Bucklin R. E. From generic to branded: A model of spillover dynamics in paid search advertising. (2007b) . Working paper, Yale University, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
  • Stone B. When mice attack. Newsweek (2005) 145(4):52Google Scholar
  • Tuzhilin A. The Lane's Gifts v. Google Report. (2006) . Working paper, New York University, New York. http://googleblog.blogspot.com/pdf/Tuzhilin_Report.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Varian H. R. Position auctions. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (2007) 25(6):1163–1178CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vickrey W. Counterspeculation, auctions and competitive sealed tenders. J. Finance (1961) 16(1):8–37CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wilk K. Rank does matter. iMedia Connection (2007) February 21). http://www.imediaconnection.com/content/13720.aspGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.