Supermarket Pricing Strategies

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1080.0398

References

  • Aguirregabiria V., Mira P. Sequential estimation of dynamic discrete games. Econometrica (2007) 75(1):1–53CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ashenfelter O., Ashmore D., Baker J. B., Gleason S., Hosken D. S. Econometric methods in merger analysis: Econometric analysis of pricing in FTC v. staples. Internat. J. Econom. Bus. (2006) 13(2):265–279CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Augereau A., Greenstein S., Rysman M. Coordination versus differentiation in a standards war: 56K modems. RAND J. Econom. (2006) 37(4):887–909CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bajari P., Benkard C. L., Levin J. Estimating dynamic models of imperfect competition. Econometrica (2007) 75(5):1331–1370CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bajari P., Hong H., Krainer J., Nekipelov D. Estimating static models of strategic interactions. (2005) . Working paper, University of MichiganGoogle Scholar
  • Bayer P., Timmins C. Estimating equilibrium models of sorting across locations. Econom. J. (2007) 117(518):353–374Google Scholar
  • Bell D., Lattin J. Shopping behavior and consumer preference for store price format: Why “large basket” shoppers prefer EDLP. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(1):66–88LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bell D., Ho T., Tang C. S. Determining where to shop: Fixed and variable costs of shopping. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35(3):352–369CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bliss C. A theory of retail pricing. J. Indust. Econom. (1988) 36(4):375–391CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brock W., Durlauf S. Discrete choice with social interactions. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2001) 62(2):235–260CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dhar S. K., Hoch S. J. Why store brand penetration varies by retailer. Marketing Sci. (1997) 16(3):208–227LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Einav L. Not all rivals look alike: Estimating an equilibrium model of the release date timing game. (2003) . Working paper, Stanford UniversityGoogle Scholar
  • Ellickson P. Quality competition in retailing: A structural analysis. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (2006) 24(3):521–540CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gowrisankaran G., Krainer J. The welfare consequences of ATM surcharges: Evidence from a structural entry model. (2004) . Working paper, Washington UniversityGoogle Scholar
  • Harsanyi J. Games with randomly disturbed payoffs: A new rationale for mixed-strategy equilibrium points. Internat. J. Game Theory (1973) 2(1):1–23CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoch S., Dreze X., Purk M. EDLP, Hi-Lo, and margin arithmetic. J. Marketing (1994) 58(4):16–27CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hotz J., Miller R. Conditional choice probabilities and the estimation of dynamic models. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1993) 60(3):497–531CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kumar N., Rao R. Using basket composition data for intelligent supermarket pricing. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(2):188–199LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lal R., Rao R. Supermarket competition: The case of everyday low pricing. Marketing Sci. (1997) 16(1):60–81LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lattin J., Ortmeyer G. A theoretical rationale for everyday low pricing by grocery retailers. (1991) . Working paperGoogle Scholar
  • Manski C. Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1993) 60(3):531–42CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Messinger P., Narasimhan C. A model of retail formats based on consumers' economizing on shopping time. Marketing Sci. (1997) 16(1):1–23LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Montgomery A. L. Creating micro-marketing pricing strategies using supermarket scanner data. Marketing Sci. (1997) 16(4):315–337LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Newey W. K., McFadden D., McFadden D., Engle R. Large sample estimation and hypothesis testing. Handbook of Econometrics (1999) 4(North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 2113–2245Chap. 36Google Scholar
  • Orhun A. Y. Spatial differentiation in the supermarket industry. (2005) . Working paper, University of CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  • Ortmeyer G., Quelch J., Salmon W. Restoring credibility to retail pricing. Sloan Management Rev. (1991) 33(1):55–66Google Scholar
  • Rust J. Optimal replacement of GMC bus engines: An empirical model of Harold Zurcher. Econometrica (1987) 55(5):999–1033CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seim K. An empirical model of firm entry with endogenous product-type choices. RAND J. Econom. (2006) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Shankar V., Bolton R. An empirical analysis of determinants of retailer pricing strategy. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(1):28–49LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Silber J., Rosenbaum P., Ross R. Comparing the contributions of groups of predictors: Which outcomes vary with hospital rather than patient characteristics. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1995) 90(429):7–18Google Scholar
  • Singh V., Hansen K., Blattberg R. Market entry and consumer behavior: An investigation of a wal-mart supercenter. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(5):457–476LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Smith H. Supermarket choice and supermarket competition in market equilibrium. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2006) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Sweeting A. Coordination games, multiple equilibria, and the timing of radio commercials. (2004) . Working paper, Northwestern UniversityGoogle Scholar
  • Varian H. A model of sales. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1980) 70(4):651–659Google Scholar
  • Watson R. Product variety and competition in the retail market for eyeglasses. (2005) . Working paper, University of TexasGoogle Scholar
  • Zhu T., Singh V., Manuszak M. Market structure and competition in the retail discount industry. (2005) . Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.