Market Research and Innovation Strategy in a Duopoly

References

• Athey S., Schmutzler A. Investment and market dominance. RAND J. Econom. (2001) 32(1):1–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell D. E., Leamon A. Compaq computer: Consumer notebook group. (1999) . Harvard Business School Case 599053, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
• Bulow J. I., Geanakopolos J. D., Klemperer P. D. Multimarket oligopoly: Strategic substitutes and complements. J. Political Econom. (1985) 93(3):488–511Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cabral L. M. B. Increasing dominance with no efficiency effect. J. Econom. Theory (2002) 102(2):471–479Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cabral L. M. B. R&D competition when firms choose variance. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2003) 12(1):66–80Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen C.The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Conner K. R. Obtaining strategic advantage from being imitated: When can encouraging “clones” pay? Management Sci. (1995) 41(2):209–226Link, Google Scholar
• Cooper R. G., Kleinschmidt E. J. New products: What separates winners from losers? J. Product Innovation Management (1987) 4(3):169–184Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crawford M., Di Benedetto A.New Products Management (2005) (McGraw Hill/Irwin, New York) . Chapter 18Google Scholar
• d'Aspremont C., Gabszewick J. J., Thisse J.-F. On Hotelling's “stability in competition”. Econometrica (1979) 47(5):1145–1150Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Palma A., Ginsburgh V., Papageorgiou Y. Y., Thisse J.-F. The principle of minimum differentiation holds under sufficient heterogeneity. Econometrica (1985) 53(4):767–781Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desai P. S., Purohit D. “Let me talk to my manager”: Haggling in a competitive environment. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(2):219–233Link, Google Scholar
• Economist, The Towards the wild blue yonder. (2002) April 25Google Scholar
• Economist, The Too many candy bars? (2004) June 19Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D., Tirole J.Game Theory (1991) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Griffin A., Hauser J. R. The voice of the customer. Marketing Sci. (1993) 12(1):1–27Link, Google Scholar
• Iyer G., Soberman D. Markets for product modification information. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19(4):203–225Link, Google Scholar
• Iyer G., Soberman D., Villas-Boas J. M. The targeting of advertising. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(3):461–476Link, Google Scholar
• Jovanovic B., Rob R. Demand-driven innovation and spatial competition over time. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1987) 54(1):63–72Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz M. L., Shapiro C. R&D rivalry with licensing or imitation. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1987) 77(3):402–420Google Scholar
• Li L., McKelvey R. D., Page T. Optimal research for cournot oligopolists. J. Econom. Theory (1987) 42(1):140–166Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luo L., Kannan P. K., Ratchford B. T. New product development under channel acceptance. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(2):149–163Link, Google Scholar
• Mansfield E. Price indexes for R and D inputs, 1969–1983. Management Sci. (1987) 33(1):124–129Link, Google Scholar
• Mansfield E., Scwartz M., Wagner S. Imitation costs and patents: An empirical study. Econom. J. (1981) 91(364):907–918Google Scholar
• Moorthy K. S. Product and price competition in a duopoly. Marketing Sci. (1988) 7(2):141–168Link, Google Scholar
• Ofek E. Eli Lilly: Developing cymbalta. (2006) . Harvard Business School Case 507-044, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
• Ofek E., Turut O. To innovate or imitate? Entry strategy and the role of market research. J. Marketing Res. (2008) 45(5):575–592Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raju J., Roy A. Market information and firm performance. Management Sci. (2000) 46(8):1075–1084Link, Google Scholar
• Sankaranayanan R. Innovation and the durable goods monopolist: The optimality of frequent new-version releases. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(6):774–791Link, Google Scholar
• Schmalensee R., Thisse J.-F. Perceptual maps and the optimal location of new products: An integrative study. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1988) 5:225–249Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaked A., Sutton J. Relaxing price competition through product differentiation. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1982) 49(1):3–13Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaked A., Sutton J. Natural oligopolies. Econometrica (1983) 51(5):1469–1483Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srinivasan V., Lovejoy W. S., Beach D. Integrated product design for marketability and manufacturing. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 34(1):154–163Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun B., Xie J., Cao H. H. Product strategy for innovators in markets with network effects. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(2):243–254Link, Google Scholar
• Thomke S., Krishnan V. Product development at dell corporation. (1999) . Harvard Business School Case 699010, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
• Tirole J.The Theory of Industrial Organization (1988) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) . Chapter 10Google Scholar
• Toubia O., Hauser J. R. On managerially efficient experimental designs. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(6):851–858Link, Google Scholar
• Toubia O., Simester D. I., Hauser J. R., Dahan E. Fast polyhedral adaptive conjoint estimation. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(3):273–303Link, Google Scholar